Showing posts with label Radical Left Wing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Radical Left Wing. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 29, 2018

The Left's long war on conservative free speech





Monday, July 9, 2018

Just to keep things in perspective, or not, Trump could nominate either Amy Coney Barrett or Vladimir Putin tomorrow and the headlines would be exactly the same



















Tuesday, June 26, 2018

Anti-Trump Rhetoric Increasingly Violent... Maxine Waters Incites Mob Violence...























Sunday, June 24, 2018

ONE Dem lawmaker says restaurant was wrong for booting Sanders



Why the Left Is Having a Nervous Breakdown



...Trump is what the shrinks call the 'presenting complaint." The real problem, as is often the case in psychotherapy, is something entirely different. And it is this: the left is dead. It's not only dead, it's decomposed with no there there or anywhere.

Only dopes or con artists believe in socialism anymore (hello, Venezuela!) and identity politics has been exposed as the racist shell game it is with blacks and Latinos actually doing better than they have in decades under the current pro-capitalist administration.

So the left has nothing to say, only most of them don't quite realize it yet. But this blockage, this reluctance and even inability to deal with what is actually happening shuts down the brain and emerges as anger, the hamster wheel of constant rage against Trump....

Saturday, June 23, 2018

Democrats are bringing back segregated restaurants.

UPDATE:
______




______




























Friday, June 22, 2018

Be wary, liberals are now openly calling for violence against their opponents on a regular basis. Their masks are off.











Thursday, June 14, 2018

(T)he ACLU is no longer a neutral defender of everyone's civil liberties; it has morphed into a hyper-partisan, hard-left political advocacy group



The director of the American Civil Liberties Union has now acknowledged what should have been obvious to everybody over the past several years: that the ACLU is no longer a neutral defender of everyone's civil liberties; it has morphed into a hyper-partisan, hard-left political advocacy group. The final nail in its coffin was the announcement that for the first time in its history the ACLU would become involved in partisan electoral politics, supporting candidates, referenda and other agenda-driven political goals.

The headline in the June 8, 2018 edition of The New Yorker tells it all: "The ACLU is getting involved in elections – and reinventing itself for the Trump Era." The article continues:

"In this midterm year, however, as progressive groups have mushroomed and grown more active, and as liberal billionaires such as Howard Schultz and Tom Steyer have begun to imagine themselves as political heroes and eye Presidential runs, the A.C.L.U., itself newly flush, has begun to move in step with the times. For the first time in its history, the A.C.L.U. is taking an active role in elections. The group has plans to spend more than twenty-five million dollars on races and ballot initiatives by Election Day, in November."

Since its establishment nearly 100 years ago, the ACLU has been, in the words of The New Yorker, "Fastidiously nonpartisan, so prudish about any alliance with any political power that its leadership, in the 1980's and 90's, declined even to give awards to likeminded legislators for fear that it might give the wrong impression." ...

Thursday, June 7, 2018

FACEBOOK, AMAZON, GOOGLE AND TWITTER ALL WORK WITH LEFT-WING HATE-GROUP



...Amazon grants the SPLC that power “because we don’t want to be biased whatsoever,” said the spokeswoman, who could not say whether Amazon considers the SPLC to be unbiased.

The Smile program allows customers to identify a charity to receive 0.5 percent of the proceeds from their purchases on Amazon. Customers have given more than $8 million to charities through the program since 2013, according to Amazon.

Only one participant in the program, the SPLC, gets to determine which other groups are allowed to join it.

Christian legal groups like the Alliance Defending Freedom — which recently successfully represented a Christian baker at the Supreme Court — are barred from the Amazon Smile program, while openly anti-Semitic groups remain, TheDCNF found in May.

One month later, the anti-Semitic groups — but not the Alliance Defending Freedom — are still able to participate in the program....

Tuesday, May 15, 2018

White women are becoming the new white men.





Whites are racists and don't even know it, or so says an increasingly accepted body of academic opinion based on a cornball arcade game exercise. With President Trump in office, it's time to dismantle the funding and policy infrastructure that relies on this quack academic theory.

The "Implicit Association Test" -- where subjects respond positively or negatively to a series of pictures and words, including ones touching on race -- was cooked up by academics, but became the foundation for media narratives and government policy during the Obama administration.

"Across America, Whites are Biased and Don't Even Know It," blared the Washington Post. "You May be More Racist Than You Think," said a CNN story. "Is Everybody a Little Bit Racist?", asked the New York Times.

You already know what the Times' answer is without reading the story....

Sunday, May 6, 2018

Interesting pitch from National Review:
Kat Timpf . . . nails it.

It seems as though every day something new is being declared “problematic.”

For example: long, adorned nails. That’s right — in January, they were declared “cultural appropriation.” That same month, an academic article by an Australian professor claimed that small chairs in pre-schools are “problematic” because they’re “disempowering” for teachers, and also kind of sexist. In March, “God Bless you” was deemed an anti-Muslim micro-aggression. In February, a writing guide at Purdue University advised against using words with “man” in them.

In terms of campus insanity, Purdue is far from the only offender. In fact, it seems as though things on our college campuses have gotten completely out of hand. In the fall, Kings College in London actually employed “safe space marshals” to police speeches for offensive content. In December, a group of student protesters at Western Washington University declared that defending the First Amendment was “violent.” Earlier this year, the University of Connecticut offered counseling to students who might be upset at “even the thought of” a Ben Shapiro speech. Earlier this month, Penn State forbade its Outing Club from going outside on the grounds that it was just too dangerous.

This is sad stuff — and there’s far too much of it for me to list here — but the truth is, the only way that people can fight it is by first knowing what’s going on. That’s why I try to use my National Review column to keep people updated on the latest political-correctness insanity and college-campus craziness. If people who disagree with the latest cultural trends want to see them change, then they have to start by being informed about what’s happening.

If you want people to continue to be able to stay informed about these issues, consider donating to National Review’s Spring Webathon. That way, I can keep writing about cultural craziness — and you can keep your nails as long and bedazzled as you want.

Many thanks,
Katherine Timpf









Monday, April 16, 2018

California’s crazy one-party liberal politics is why I had to finally leave the state -- and I’m not alone



Twitter’s CEO, Jack Dorsey, infamously tweeted a link in early April to a story calling for a bloodless civil war to solve America’s problems. The piece, “The Great Lesson of California in America’s New Civil War: Why there’s no bipartisan way forward at this juncture in our history — one side must win” was authored by Peter Leyden and Ruy Teixeira.

The duo assert that this new civil war will follow a path blazed by California 15 years ago, namely, the crushing of the Republican Party. “The Democrats won; the Republicans lost,” they intone, “California is the future…”

Living and working in places like Washington and San Francisco as Teixeira and Twitter’s Dorsey do, tends to distort the view of the real world....

In 2011, after spending my adult life in California, working in the once-thriving aerospace industry there, serving 19 years in the state’s National Guard and six years in the legislature, I picked up my family and moved to Texas.

The first benefit of moving was buying a home that was close to twice as large as our old home in California for $110,000 less—providing needed room to care for two ailing parents.

That home prices and rents in California average 55 percent higher than in Texas isn’t just due to the former’s good weather—the Golden State’s high taxes, capricious regulations, onerous lawsuit climate, and powerful unions all contribute to constraining the supply of new housing while jacking up the price of existing housing....

Sunday, April 15, 2018

The world’s first climate propaganda satellite to be lauched?



Crazy People Are Dangerous

How many times do I have to explain this? - RS McCain (banned on Twitter)

Saturday, April 14, 2018

(T)he Obama Admin had sent U.S. taxpayer funds overseas to an org backed by billionaire George Soros – which used the money to fund left-wing political activities benefiting the socialist government in Albania

Saturday, April 7, 2018

The California legislature, more so than any other elected body in the country, is filled with lawmakers who live to manage other people’s lives and dictate seemingly innocuous personal decisions and behavior:

Obama Supporters Rush to Save His ‘Dangerous’ School Leniency Policy for Minority Students



...Politico reports Scott said the GAO report “dispels claims that racially disproportionate rates of discipline are based solely on income.”

“This report underscores the need to combat these gross disparities by strengthening, not rescinding, the 2014 Discipline Guidance Package, which recommends specific strategies to reduce the disparities without jeopardizing school safety,” he added.

The report is not “news,” since no one has disputed that minority students are disciplined at higher rates than whites and Asians. At issue is that Obama supporters attribute those higher rates to racism by teachers and school administrators.

“There are no surprises in the GAO report,” University of San Diego law professor Gail Heriot, a member of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, confirms to Breitbart News. “From time immemorial, we’ve known boys get disciplined more often than girls. It’s just that in the past nobody was silly enough to argue that anti-male bias was the primary reason.”...

In a law review article on school discipline, Heriot and her colleague Alison Somin assert the Obama directive is “wrongheaded” and has introduced a higher level of “danger” to schools....