Saturday, March 14, 2015
The press routinely expects Republicans to condemn their own side for things Democrats routinely do. The press never does that to Democrats.
...Just last week, the Democrats’ communications director said he wanted to kill Chris Christie dead. Were it the communications director of the GOP saying that about Hillary Clinton, we would be in the second week of news stories about the outrage. News networks would have daily coverage of Democrats getting threatened....
The biases are not just in what is covered, but in how much it is covered and where the coverage happens in the paper and in the segment placement and whether something is treated as claimed or true. Outrage over Republicans is always disproportionately higher. Republican statements are treated as claims and Democrat statements are treated as facts. It is not always intentional per se, but is always a reflection of the world view of those packaging the news. They view the tea party and conservatives as more disruptive, more malcontented, and more prone to bad behavior. So they focus on that as it conforms to a pre-conceived narrative....
If the press has no intention of being fair, don’t expect the rest of us to be.
If This Bill Becomes Law, Arizona Is About To Throw A Major Wrench Into President Obama’s Agenda.
According to the state legislature’s fact sheet, there are only two provisions to the bill:
- Prohibits this state or any of its political subdivisions from using any personnel or financial resources to enforce, administer or cooperate with an executive order issued by the President of the U.S. that has not been affirmed by a vote of Congress and signed into law as prescribed by the U.S. Constitution.
- Prohibits this state or any of its political subdivisions from using any personnel or financial resources to enforce, administer or cooperate with a policy directive issued by the U.S. DOJ to law enforcement agencies in this state that has not been affirmed by a vote of Congress and signed into law as prescribed by the U.S. Constitution.
Byron York: On Benghazi, a timeline of State Department obstruction
Byron York: On Benghazi, a timeline of State Department obstruction http://t.co/1uzAh68S9p— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) March 14, 2015
Poll: Benghazi getting worse for Hillary Clinton http://t.co/6rJyGAvCdy— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) March 14, 2015
What if Hillary doesn't run?
21 Democrats who could (maybe) take Hillary Clinton's place in 2016 http://t.co/LRK1lGySMW pic.twitter.com/TsVsk5Ry98— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) March 14, 2015
Media Matters pushes hard for Hillary 2016, putting its nonprofit status in question http://t.co/Pqn9WMamtE— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) March 14, 2015
Bill’s female cabinet members and feminist supporters had no choice but to accept the unappetizing quid pro quo: The Clintons would give women progressive public policies as long as the women didn’t assail Bill for his regressive private behavior with women.
DOWD: 'Annoyed queen, radiating irritation'... http://t.co/xIRbfe4p7Q— DRUDGE REPORT (@DRUDGE_REPORT) March 14, 2015
Use of @HillaryClinton shadow images spreading: An Open Letter to email@example.com http://t.co/z4fWiu32aI pic.twitter.com/5NXsRsBdkp— Legal Insurrection (@LegInsurrection) March 14, 2015
It’s not really hunger that’s propelling Hillary now, it's Newton’s 1st law: Objects in motion tend to stay in motion http://t.co/JB4KwgOll6— Peggy Noonan (@Peggynoonannyc) March 14, 2015
Krauthammer Breaks Down Why Hillary Clinton Is Refusing to Release Her Emails http://t.co/PB5uP0vfJK pic.twitter.com/anXXROFty9— IJReview (@ijreview) March 12, 2015
Anti-Semitism, I've seen, is like a disease that goes dormant, flaring up with the next political trigger.
If we confront anti-Semitism ... if we combat it individually and as a society, and use whatever platform we have to denounce it, we can stop the spread of this madness.... TODAY'S MUST READ
Happy SUPER pi day!!! 3/14/15 9:26 and 53 seconds!!
Happy Pi Day! The date 3.1415 comes once-in-a-century. How scientists use this number: http://t.co/Vwluofpt6F #PiDay pic.twitter.com/aLekewZE7C— NASA (@NASA) March 14, 2015
Happy SUPER pi day!!! 3/14/15 9:26 and 53 seconds!!!— Marc Ensign (@MarcEnsign) March 14, 2015
@nycjim ' ．A SLICE OF PI =========== 3.1415926535 1640628620 23172535 881097 5432 036 5 Happy #PiDay ;)— Katya ᷅\_(ヅ)_/ ᷄ (@kpcuk) March 14, 2015
Under Obama, Democrats have lost more than 900 state legislative seats, 69 U.S. House seats and 13 U.S. senate seats, all the most since World War II. Democrats also have lost 11 governorships
The party controlling the White House almost always loses down the ballot, especially for a two-term president, according to Geoffrey Skelley, associate editor of Sabato's Crystal Ball.
But under Obama, Democrats have lost more than 900 state legislative seats, 69 U.S. House seats and 13 U.S. senate seats, all the most since World War II. Democrats also have lost 11 governorships.
Republicans now control 31 governorships. Obama was elected as a sitting senator, but usually governors, former governors or vice presidents win.
"That executive experience has to make you a more attractive option," Skelley said. "Governors have a track record for executive decision-making."
The GOP has governors in several key battleground states, including Florida and the Midwest's Wisconsin, Indiana, Michigan. It even has the governor's mansion in deep-blue Illinois and Iowa.
It's not a real surprise that the early GOP front-runners for the 2016 presidential nomination are Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and ex-Florida Gov. Jeb Bush.
But it gets worse. Democrats don't just lack a bench. The bench lacks a bench.
The GOP now controls 68 of the country's 98 legislative chambers, excluding Nebraska's officially nonpartisan unicameral legislature. That's a gain of 30 chambers since the end of 2008. Republicans hold the most slate legislative seats since the 1920s.
As a result, the Democrats' pool of potential future governors and U.S. senators is historically low. That suggests that the ranks of attractive Democratic presidential contenders will be thin for years to come, even if the party starts to reverse its down-ticket losses.... KEEP READING
The Tyranny of Silence - Why Liberty
VIDEO: #WhyLiberty? For journalist Flemming Rose free speech is worth the price: http://t.co/0iDKoGbHXu pic.twitter.com/rQr4YRFXCi— Cato Institute (@CatoInstitute) March 14, 2015
#WhyLiberty? For journalist Flemming Rose free speech is worth the price
Vladimir Putin in Switzerland for ‘birth of love child’? No?
Where in the World Is Vladimir Putin?Not Giving Birth. http://t.co/ruL1gqDUVH @ColorMeRed @RoyalTXGirl @americanLady49 @saconi12 @Meklove— Paramjit S Garewal (@ParamjitGarewal) March 14, 2015
Russian President Vladimir Putin hasn’t been seen in public since March 5, and depending on whom you ask, he’s either dead, has had a stroke, has cancer, is being overthrown in a palace coup, or, contrary to his spokesperson’s denials Friday, has been out of the public eye because he has fathered a lovechild.
“Information that a child has been born to Vladimir Putin is not true,” Putin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told Forbes Russia. “I am planning to appeal to people who have money to organize a competition for the best journalistic hoax,” he added.
◼ Putin is on paternity leave! - New York Post
After days of rumors that mysteriously missing Russian President Vladimir Putin was sick or dodging a coup, a Swiss paper is reporting that the leader was in Lugano for the birth of his love child. The paper Blick said uber-playboy Putin and his alleged paramour Alina Kabayeva, 32, a former Olympic gymnast, welcomed their baby in a private clinic in the Italian-speaking canton of Ticino, The Daily Beast reported. A Swiss radio station reported that Putin reserved two rooms at the fancy clinic—one for the new mommy and another for their bodyguards.
Where's Vladimir Putin? After health rumors started swirling, the Kremlin posted some photos: http://t.co/PISvD58Qya pic.twitter.com/73DV9fnOUx— CNN (@CNN) March 13, 2015
Putin, Said to Be ‘Perfectly Healthy,’ Is Also Nowhere to Be Seen http://t.co/3zhow2KKSV— The New York Times (@nytimes) March 13, 2015
Kremlin critics fear political ‘hit list’ as Putin drops out of sight http://t.co/Qigj5IP3lh— TIME.com (@TIME) March 14, 2015
Friday, March 13, 2015
“Running against Hillary is like running against Jerry Brown in California,”
California Governor Jerry Brown (D) knows better than to give Hillary Clinton a pass on her private email scandal.
When the Washington Post asked Brown about it on Friday, “Brown said he is not convinced the issue is a passing storm, as many other Democrats contend.”
“I don’t know that,” Brown said. “With these things, what makes a difference, you often don’t know until it unfolds because nothing is just what it is. It’s always in part of a larger context. Things unfold and things happen.”
As the New York Times noted, Democrats, who believe Clinton is “too big to fail” and their inevitable nominee, have been put in the unenviable position of defending Clinton’s many scandals....
WaPo Exclu: Gov. Jerry Brown on Hillary Clinton and why a 2016 primary challenge wouldn't be "fruitful" http://t.co/zQCoNw8Jyx— Philip Rucker (@PhilipRucker) March 13, 2015
"So that lie by Hillary didn't even last 3 whole days."
RT @drawandstrike "So that lie by Hillary didn't even last 3 whole days." - http://t.co/OqCDtyndQ4 (via @FreeBeacon)— Adam Baldwin (@AdamBaldwin) March 14, 2015
◼ State Dept Contradicts Clinton Claim that Emails to State Accounts Were ‘Automatically Saved’ - Washington Free Beacon
Shorter Politico: Hillary is inconvenienced by the fact that she must actually run for president. I kid you not. http://t.co/8XdhDcyd1N— Ken Gardner (@kesgardner) March 14, 2015
Tropic of Cankle http://t.co/411S2Zsdhu #HillaryEmail— Mark Steyn (@MarkSteynOnline) March 14, 2015
Shocked, shocked to find gambling going on here: "Emails, Hillary Clinton Said Were Kept, Could Be Lost" http://t.co/53sxA006uh— Hugh Hewitt (@hughhewitt) March 14, 2015
Hillary deleted 30K emails & doesn't want her server subpoenaed. What's she hiding? #HillaryEmail #RedNationRising pic.twitter.com/3oIXLnAMXn— RNRKentucky (@RNRKentucky) March 14, 2015
Note to Safari users: If you see lines, but no images in this post, refresh your browser. Safari's energy saver settings 'hide' the tweets/images otherwise.
Obama’s Treason Is the New Patriotism
The New York Daily News denounced senators opposed to an Obama deal giving Iran the ability to develop and deploy nuclear weapons as “Traitors”. The administration’s social media allies’ hashtag dubbed Republicans opposed to Iran’s nuclear weapons as #47Traitors.
Traitors oppose terrorists getting nuclear weapons. Patriots like Joe Biden not only support it, but they blast a president trying to stop it while collecting $30,000 at a pro-Iranian fundraiser.
“Treason doth never prosper: what’s the reason?” Sir John Harrington cynically observed. “Why, if it prosper, none dare call it treason.”
But the Elizabethan courtier left out that when traitors rule, patriotism becomes treason. Obama commits treason and taunts his critics as traitors.
Republicans who want to see American leadership rise to the challenge of ISIS and Iran are accused of collaborating with ISIS and Iran by an administration that willfully lied and misrepresented the growth of ISIS for as long as it could and that is now doing the same thing for Iran’s nuclear threat.
@Sultanknish Yes, 1984 has arrived - albeit 31 years post. Obama’s Treason Is the New Patriotism | FrontPage Magazine http://t.co/JotDGBhqHp— Scott Mayer (@Politiseeds) March 13, 2015
White House traitor petition is a disgrace http://t.co/3WG9PJsUio #IBDEditorials via @IBDinvestors— Andrew Malcolm (@AHMalcolm) March 14, 2015
Iranian President Considers Diplomacy With the U.S. a Modern Day ‘Jihad’ http://t.co/PaA1Ckz6DF pic.twitter.com/tBAZwhYSwp— IJReview (@ijreview) March 14, 2015
Calling the Senate GOP traitors: Beyond Orwellian http://t.co/b41B0jTo1F— HotAir.com (@hotairblog) March 15, 2015
Valerie Jarrett: "I intend to stay until the lights go off."
"I intend to stay until the lights go off." Valerie Jarrett talks with @jimrutenberg http://t.co/nG1duwJfyF— Peter Baker (@peterbakernyt) March 13, 2015
.@vj44 arrogance in this interview gets to the heart of the disconnect in Obama administration http://t.co/wubZvS4KgB pic.twitter.com/MGs2dKYTxS— SalenaZito (@SalenaZitoTrib) March 13, 2015
◼ ‘We’re PAYING her for that’? Guess what Valerie Jarrett says is ‘part of my job’ - Twitchy
Valerie Jarrett: "part of my job for the president is to be his friend." That's a weird quote, right? Weird? http://t.co/MDt8rks28l— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) March 13, 2015
.@vj44: NO part of your job is being POTUS' pal. Be that on your own dime. Your job is to serve us and The President. http://t.co/Slrf19YwqD— Ron Fournier (@ron_fournier) March 13, 2015
@weeklystandard @Patriotic1s I thought her job was to run the country so he is free to play golf.— I'm Just Me (@libertylover49) March 13, 2015
Gawker Suing Feds Over 'Nixonian' Plot to Frustrate FOIA Process
Gawker Suing Feds Over 'Nixonian' Plot to Frustrate FOIA Process http://t.co/b8BO8iKHWR #StopHillary2016 #tcot pic.twitter.com/MImBjpPLbm— Linda Suhler, Ph.D. (@LindaSuhler) March 13, 2015
◼ National Archives Tried to Hide Email About Living in Fear of White House - Washington Free Beacon
Associated Press president Gary Pruitt reported in an op-ed on government transparency that, during the course of an AP investigation into Michelle Obama’s dresses, NARA used a privacy exemption to redact a line in an email that was actually about the agency’s fear of the White House:
As the president said, the United States should not withhold or censor government files merely because they might be embarrassing.The Freedom of Information Act should be administered with a clear presumption: In the face of doubt, openness prevails,” the White House said in a 2009 memo to all federal agencies. “The Government should not keep information confidential merely because public officials might be embarrassed by disclosure, because errors and failures might be revealed, or because of speculative or abstract fears.”
But it happens anyway.
In government emails that AP obtained in reporting about who pays for Michelle Obama’s expensive dresses, the National Archives and Records Administration blacked out one sentence repeatedly, citing a part of the law intended to shield personal information such as Social Security numbers or home addresses.
The blacked-out sentence? The government slipped and let it through on one page of the redacted documents: “We live in constant fear of upsetting the WH (White House).”
How Obama's policies caused a thin Democratic bench for 2016
How Obama's policies caused a thin Democratic bench for 2016 http://t.co/dWJ2awI2FJ pic.twitter.com/pcYekuyzpN— National Review (@NRO) March 13, 2015
Karl Rove: Democrats are struggling awfully to recruit good Senate candidates: http://t.co/9GYU5MtMEe pic.twitter.com/eJu5vRvhlf— NRSC (@NRSC) March 14, 2015
Democrats don't just lack a presidential bench. The bench lacks a bench. Here's why: http://t.co/9BVR9aQvjV— Ed Carson (@IBD_ECarson) March 12, 2015
Rand Paul: “I’m not particularly happy with being lectured by the administration about the Constitution; this is an administration… that has trampled the Constitution at many turns”
Rand Paul’s Epic Rant: ‘I’m Not Particularly Happy Being Lectured to by the Administration About the Constitution’ http://t.co/hSCivzJzPF— Bob Gaskin (@BobG231) March 12, 2015
◼ Rand Paul Skewers Obama: Letter to Iran ‘Should Have Been CC’ed to the White House’ - MRC TV
“This is an administration that seeks to legislate [what] is not in their purview: whether it be immigration…healthcare…or a war that has now been going on eight months without Congressional authorization,” said Paul pointedly.
“This administration is in direct defiance of what Sen. Obama ran on, what he was elected upon,” said Paul. Obama “said ‘no country should go to war without the authority of the Congress unless under imminent attack.’”
Paul: “I signed the letter to Iran, but you know what? The message I was sending was to you. The message was to President Obama. We want you to obey the law. We want you to understand the separation of powers.”
47 Senate Republicans signed an open letter to Iran this week that said: "we will consider any agreement regarding your nuclear weapons program that is not approved by the Congress as nothing more than an executive agreement between President Obama and Ayatollah Khomenei."
Paul continued: “So why do I sign this letter [to Iran]? I sign this letter to an administration that doesn’t listen. To an administration that every turn tries to go around Congress because you think you can’t get your way. The president says ‘oh the Congress won’t do what I want, so I’ve got a pen and I’ve got a phone, I’m gonna do what I want.’”
“The letter was to Iran, but it should have been CC’ed to the White House, because he needs to understand that any agreement that removes or changes legislation will have to be passed by us,” said Paul.
Iran Instructs U.S. to Bypass Congress on Deal, Go to U.N.
Iran Instructs U.S. to Bypass Congress on Deal, Go to U.N. http://t.co/vui5RT0LMa via @Kredo0 pic.twitter.com/9GlIDFGzvP— Free Beacon (@FreeBeacon) March 13, 2015
"Can we trust Obama on Iran?" http://t.co/EvlGpU734g pic.twitter.com/Ck9HJPKWvH— The Hill (@thehill) March 13, 2015
The juxtaposition here: pic.twitter.com/foUHv6MCwi— Michelle Peper (@MPeper) March 13, 2015
Blue Lake Bigfoot Run Sunday May 17
◼ Register online or at the JoggNShoppe! ◼ MORE: Bigfootrun.net
When: Sunday, May 17th, 2015 at 11:00am
Where: Perigot Park, Blue Lake, CA
A Contrived Controversy and an Emboldened Iran
The Left's love affair with communism, fascism, and Islamism http://t.co/6mJXF5Mrs3— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) March 13, 2015
◼ ADVANCE EDITORIAL from the March 23, 2015, issue. - Stephen Hayes/Weekly Standard
Finally, a debate about Iran. Last week, 47 Republican senators released a public letter addressed to the leaders of the Iranian regime. The letter made what might have seemed a self-evident point: If the Obama administration reaches a deal with Iran, Congress will not be bound by parts of the deal to which it has not assented.
FCC Cites Soros-Funded, Neo-Marxist-Founded Group 46 TIMES In New "Net Neutrality' Regs
...The FCC received more than 4 million public comments as it was weighing the net neutrality initiative, but Free Press and other activist groups have received the most attention by pressuring the FCC and the White House on behalf of their cause.
One argument made against the FCC’s regulatory push is that the general public is largely happy with its internet service. Support for net neutrality was seen as the domain of special interest groups like Free Press.
The activist group has big money behinds its effort. It has received $2.2 million in donations from progressive billionaire George Soros’ Open Society Foundations and $3.9 million from the Ford Foundation.
And one of Free Press’ co-founders, Robert McChesney, a communications professor at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, has not been shy about his desire to see the internet regulated heavily....
But internet regulation appears to be only part of McChesney’s more radical agenda of completely revamping how the media operate in the U.S.
“In the end, there is no real answer but to remove brick by brick the capitalist system itself, rebuilding the entire society on socialist principles,” McChesney wrote in a 2009 essay.
“Only government can implement policies and subsidies to provide an institutional framework for quality journalism,” he said.
“The news is not a commercial product. It is a public good, necessary for a self-governing society. Once we accept this, we can talk about the kind of media policies and subsidies we want,” McChesney once argued.
Sentiments such as these have raised questions about whether the FCC’s new regulations will eventually lead to oversight of internet content.
“The unthinkable has become thinkable, and the free-market Internet – one of freedom’s greatest triumphs – is set to be reduced to a public utility, subject to pervasive economic regulation and, in turn, to content control,” American Commitment’s Kerpen wrote in an open letter to McChesney after the FCC voted 3-2 in favor of the regulations.... KEEP READING
60% Say Obama’s Deal Unlikely To Keep #Iran From Nukes
60% Say Obama’s Deal Unlikely To Keep #Iran From Nukes... http://t.co/9GeAyhiYJv— Rasmussen Reports (@Rasmussen_Poll) March 12, 2015
Thursday, March 12, 2015
EmailGate: First Lois Lerner, Then Hillary Clinton, Now Eric Holder. How Corrupt Is This Administration?
EmailGate: First Lois Lerner, Then Hillary Clinton, Now Eric Holder. How Corrupt Is This Administration? http://t.co/5l2DNp6Edf #tcot— PJ Media (@PJMedia_com) March 11, 2015
Free Guccifer -- and turn him loose on Hillary's server, insists @rogerlsimon http://t.co/kTjtdaK8b9 pic.twitter.com/wLJ27XSWdY— Ed Driscoll (@EdDriscoll) March 12, 2015
New RLS blog #TCOT Free Guccifer! http://t.co/h4ipj7qm17— Roger Simon (@rogerlsimon) March 12, 2015
Although we all talk about Hillary’s EmailGate, we shouldn’t forget that this controversy actually started with Lois Lerner. When Republicans tried to find out whether the IRS had purposefully targeted conservative organizations, this former head of the Internal Revenue Service said her email had suddenly disappeared.
And then came in Hillary, who, the Benghazi Select Committee says, didn’t hand over all her emails and who used a personal, rather than a government email address to conduct official business, everything related to the attack on the embassy in Benghazi, Libya, included. Again, important information is being hidden from the American people.
Lastly, we now have Attorney General Eric Holder who has used not one, not two, but three email aliases. He maintains all records have been kept, but whether that’s true is anyone’s guess.... ◼ KEEP READING
Politico: Taxpayers funded Clinton Foundation staff http://t.co/aEmyxSJ9yn— Ed Morrissey (@EdMorrissey) March 12, 2015
Judge Keeps Obama Immigration Policies On Hold to investigate if Obama Admin lied to Judge.
UPDATE: Judge Keeps Obama Immigration Policies On Hold to investigate if Obama Admin lied to Judge. http://t.co/Mqu4SAwMIx— Greg Abbott (@GregAbbott_TX) March 10, 2015
FCC releases 313 pages of #NetNeutrality regulations
FCC releases 313 pages of #NetNeutrality regulations: http://t.co/KBRrSgyWCn pic.twitter.com/YJ84EyC6QU— The Hill (@thehill) March 12, 2015
Gallup Poll: America's most important problem? Government.
Gov't listed as top U.S. problem for four months straight... http://t.co/Ew084AivCD #GallupDaily pic.twitter.com/fFBZZJVkEW— GallupNews (@GallupNews) March 12, 2015
Gallup Poll: America's most important problem? Government. http://t.co/xedb496FJC— POLITICO (@politico) March 12, 2015
RECORD LOW CONFIDENCE IN GOVT: 5% for CONGRESS ,11% for POTUS (WHY SO HIGH?) but 50% 4 MILITARY. POLL: http://t.co/9gex2pupfC @gegco— Belladonna Rogers (@BeladonnaRogers) March 12, 2015
RT @clarkbarrow: Daily Briefing: Americans believe their government is the biggest problem facing the U.S. http://t.co/BL1743Q2ux— Herman Cain (@THEHermanCain) March 13, 2015
Why Clinton's Emails Matter
Editorial Cartoon: Snapchat subpoena http://t.co/3RA95n6BO1 pic.twitter.com/yQAS5ih8Sv— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) March 12, 2015
◼ ...one only need watch the press conference from Tuesday to see the real cause for concern. It isn’t just that Clinton looked tired, was flat-footed in her responses, and made some cringe-worthy comments about not wanting to have two email accounts to follow.... - Sean Trende/Real Clear Politics
To see how I think it might matter, it’s worth thinking back to 2008, and why Hillary Clinton lost the Democratic nomination to a relatively inexperienced challenger. Barack Obama running a pitch-perfect campaign mattered a lot, as did Hillary Clinton’s vote for the Iraq War.
Her problems, however, went deeper. To start, she’s not a natural politician. Remember, the wheels started to come off the campaign bus for her in 2008 after her answer to this question on driver's licenses for undocumented immigrants. It’s still hard to watch the exchange without cringing. Her speeches tended to be wooden and forced. She didn’t exude warmth.
◼ DID HILLARY CLINTON COMMIT CRIMES? - PAUL MIRENGOFF/POWERLINE
...It is undisputed that Clinton did not take the steps that are required before documents may be removed from Department custody. In fact, it is undisputed that the deleted emails were never in the Department’s custody.
For that matter, the emails that Clinton didn’t destroy were not in State’s custody for a period of about two years following her departure from the Department. This too is a violation, Coffin notes. Thus, the case that Clinton committed the felony of willfully and unlawfully concealing and/or destroying records seems strong....
Krauthammer: ‘It’s Not Over,’ Hillary Either Committed A Felony Or Perjury [VIDEO] http://t.co/VqrtB5E6HV pic.twitter.com/98S22pJfOs— Al Weaver (@alweaver22) March 13, 2015
For the first time, I do not think Hillary Clinton will be the nominee, and now I think it is less than 50% that the Dems will will in 2016.— TheClassyLife (@AceofSpadesHQ) March 12, 2015
Is the Obama-Jarrett Duo Behind Hillary Clinton’s Email Scandal? http://t.co/5ZVqHihheC #tcot— PJ Media (@PJMedia_com) March 12, 2015
Shorter Politico: Hillary is inconvenienced by the fact that she must actually run for president. I kid you not. http://t.co/8XdhDcyd1N— Ken Gardner (@kesgardner) March 14, 2015
Atalanta's Victory Run coming May 10th
It's a girl thing ... and it's open for registration now! T-shirts will only be available if ordered by April 4 (at a cost of $15 over registration). Register online or by mail ... info is on the flyer below and on the ◼ SRRC Six Rivers Running Club website.
Additional updates will be posted on the ◼ Atalanta's Victory Run FaceBook Page.
FERGUSON COPS SHOT
◼ 'Ambush' - CBS St. Louis
◼ Seriously injured - KSDK
◼ Protests continue after police chief quits - St. Louis American
◼ VIDEO: PROTESTER TAUNTS COPS AFTER TWO POLICE OFFICERS SHOT IN FERGUSON - Breitbart
Police rush to aid of officer shot at Ferguson Police Department as protest winds down (LBPhoto1) pic.twitter.com/rl6jPD8owR— Chris King (@chriskingstl) March 12, 2015
Broadcast live streaming video on Ustream
◼ RAW VIDEO: Two Police Officers Shot in Front of Ferguson Police Department WARNING: Violence and Strong Language - PJ Media (video substituted via nothiefs)
“These police officers were standing there and they were shot, just because they were police officers.”
Shots fire. Guy shouts: "Acknowledgement nine months ago would've kept that from happenin'!" I ask: WTF? http://t.co/C9wJTBXw6q #Ferguson— Ron Fournier (@ron_fournier) March 12, 2015
One officer shot in the face, the other in the shoulder. Both officers alive. #FergusonShooting #Ferguson— Michelle Ray (@GaltsGirl) March 12, 2015
From these #ferguson details, the attempted assassination of the two police officers nearly succeeded. But for the grace of God.— Jazz Shaw (@JazzShaw) March 12, 2015
St. Louis County police chief on Ferguson shooting: "This is really an ambush — is what it is" http://t.co/jH0yiDPJZR pic.twitter.com/Dyz3zRYswy— CBS News (@CBSNews) March 12, 2015
DOJ doing a helluva job: Two officers shot, seriously injured outside Ferguson police department | http://t.co/eXb9QZAOhu— Lou Dobbs (@loudobbsnews) March 12, 2015
Obama and the Media Have the Blood of Cops on their Hands | FrontPage Magazine http://t.co/PpDeHl0vG7— Daniel Greenfield (@Sultanknish) March 12, 2015
MSM created the hate, then hid behind the very officers they attempted to turn into villains. #Ferguson pic.twitter.com/zAKexpVhJe— Bob Owens (@bob_owens) March 12, 2015
@GayPatriot @deray so how many police officers is it okay to kill before we start talking about enforcing laws?— Charles Bellows (@CTBellows) March 12, 2015
In the vigilante world of social justice, multiple findings of self-defense justify attempted murder. #Ferguson— Razor (@hale_razor) March 12, 2015
WHEN #RACE-BAITING GOES WRONG #politics http://t.co/VrzE5aFI42 pic.twitter.com/AtbPj42HK1— Politolizer (@Politolizer) March 12, 2015
"Let’s be real clear. We’re not saying the protesters did anything with the shooting or not. We don’t know” -Sharpton http://t.co/HTuIO6SVTm— Charlie Spiering (@charliespiering) March 12, 2015
'Subliminally negative'? New TIME magazine cover gives Hillary Clinton 'horns'
@DanaPerino @ericbolling Coincidence? HILLARY HAS HORNS! http://t.co/wJP7l7X8YT pic.twitter.com/A48XuRtHNt— Joseph Curl (@josephcurl) March 12, 2015
Why Are Democrats Stuck With Hillary? Democrats Have No Bench Thanks to Obama Defeats http://t.co/7iTXSTZw5Q #IBDBlogs via @IBDinvestors— Andrew Malcolm (@AHMalcolm) March 12, 2015
The Top 6 most questionable claims Hillary Clinton made about her emails: http://t.co/Juqr5wQEX5 pic.twitter.com/SWL0E8Dz9w— The Hill (@thehill) March 12, 2015
RNC Video Shreds Hillary Clinton’s Claim of Being ‘Most Transparent Person in Public Life’ | Washing… http://t.co/Ss6SNH5i4d— Michelle Ray (@GaltsGirl) March 12, 2015
'Subliminally negative'? New TIME magazine cover gives Hillary Clinton 'horns' http://t.co/qfS0eEsvtL— TwitchyTeam (@TwitchyTeam) March 12, 2015
Hillary's 3 Blue Dress scandal. Clintonista spin can't make it vanish. 1. Violated regs 2. Deleted thousands of emails 3. Still has server— John Nolte (@NolteNC) March 12, 2015
New York Post blasts Hillary on today's cover... pic.twitter.com/QQ2Wl5b0Bt— FOX & Friends (@foxandfriends) March 11, 2015
Well. That settles it. pic.twitter.com/oRtPhqursR— Rick Wilson (@TheRickWilson) March 13, 2015
Wednesday, March 11, 2015
IT Expert Says He Traced Hillary’s Email Server To Manhattan Government Building [VIDEO]
◼ Cyber-security expert Vinny Troia told Fox News’ Greta Van Susteren on Tuesday that he traced the IP address of the server Hillary Clinton used to host the private email account she used as secretary of state to a government building in the heart of New York City. - Chuck Ross/Daily Caller
Hillary Clinton email location data on Google maps. @greta thanks for having me on @foxnews pic.twitter.com/i7Rm2AXCor— Vinny Troia (@vinnytroia) March 10, 2015
Clinton was required to sign document claiming she turned over emails in 2013 http://t.co/vsD7beO6zd— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) March 12, 2015
There are 18 lawsuits, ten of which are active in federal court, as well as about 160 Judicial Watch FOIA requests that could be affected by Mrs. Clinton and her staff’s use of secret email accounts to conduct official government business.
Clinton apologists from within and outside of the State Department have made the point that by turning over 55,000 pages of emails to department officials, critics should be placated. So then in order to diffuse the controversy, why doesn’t Clinton simply release the records she already turned over? To do so “would highlight the fact that Clinton’s own aides and lawyers determined which records were work-related,” Politico surmises. That is putting it charitably.
There seems to be an assumption that the account(s) at issue are her “personal” accounts. On the contrary, these accounts, which were set up by the Secretary of State to conduct government business, are alias government accounts and should be treated as such. No third party reviews, as some are suggesting, are necessary if State follows the law and treats the account(s) as it would any other State.gov account. The State Department is obligated to secure the accounts as soon as possible to protect classified materials, retrieve any lost data, protect other federal records, and search records as required by court orders in our various FOIA lawsuits, and in response to congressional subpoenas, etc.
Rather than her private lawyers/campaign advisers reviewing the accounts and releasing material to the government, the agency should assert its ownership, secure the material, and prohibit private parties from illicitly reviewing potentially classified and other sensitive material.
Democrats are probably stuck with Clinton. So Democrats have taken to hoping that Republicans “overplay their hand.”
Hillary: I deleted over 30,000 "personal" emails, and the server I used "will remain private" http://t.co/rmu1NUFYrc pic.twitter.com/VzehtazJM2— New York Post (@nypost) March 11, 2015
◼ HILLARY CONCEDES SHE DELETED NEARLY 30K ‘PRIVATE’ EMAILS - Breitbart
‘Going to leave a mark’: Today's New York Post cover hilariously slams Hillary over deleted emails http://t.co/mDXvXtC5tt— TwitchyTeam (@TwitchyTeam) March 11, 2015
◼ They’re hoping and praying that Trey Gowdy ruins everything - HotAir
In fact, the press has been publicly entertaining this scenario since the revelations regarding Clinton’s emails were disclosed. But the GOP’s unusual message discipline and reserved silence with regard to Clinton’s email controversy has frustrated those in the commentary class for whom Republican tactical errors are as predictable as the tides. Distraught, some in the press are now placing their hopes on the one Republican who has consistently failed to overreach, despite the fact that Democrats and the press have provided him with miles of rope with which he was expected to hang himself.◼ IT BEGINS: AP SUES FOR CLINTON RECORDS - T. Becket Adams/Washington Examiner
“The stakes have suddenly gotten very, very high for Rep. Trey Gowdy,” the latest Politico report on Clinton’s email scandal began....KEEP READING
◼ AP FACT-CHECK: HILLARY’S EMAIL EXCUSES DON’T HOLD WATER - Breitbart
◼ Sen. Boxer: ‘If You Don’t Believe’ Hillary’s Excuses for Email Scandal, ‘Don’t Vote for Her’ - Washington Free Beacon
This vine template has incredible potential https://t.co/wRkgX1ZLj5— Elliott Schwartz (@elliosch) March 12, 2015
Breaking: House Oversight Committee to seek electronic copies of Clinton emails, chairman says http://t.co/WPofrJgs3W— WSJ Asia (@WSJAsia) March 11, 2015
Will Hillary Clinton Get Prosecuted Like David Petraeus? http://t.co/7IgEO7InbG … #IBDEditorials via @IBDinvestors pic.twitter.com/bgIHMiF4yx— Daniel John Sobieski (@gerfingerpoken) March 10, 2015
Liberal MSNBC Host: What if this were Dick Cheney instead of Hillary Clinton? http://t.co/yqM5DOwo1x— NevadaTeaParty (@TeaPartyNevada) March 11, 2015
HARD DRIVE DESTROYED?
NOTHING CLASSIFIED? REALLY?
Said she emailed with Bill...
BUT spokesman claims he only has sent two in his life... Circus back in town...
Media Demons Return To Haunt...
Huma and Cheryl Mills used private emails at State...
NORMAN LEAR TURNS...
VIDEO: Wacth her age 50 years in 60 seconds...
FLASHBACK: Deputy independent counsel says he wrote 'rough draft indictment' of Hillary...
FLASHBACK, MICHAEL KELLY: I BELIEVE IT ALL...
LARP at Humboldt Botanical Garden! April 11, 2015
◼ SAVE THE DATE!! LARP at Humboldt Botanical Garden! April 11, 2015 10-3 PM Start getting your costume together now! Prizes for the best LARP costume. Or, just come observe the fun all day on April 11th. See you at the Garden!
LARP: Live Action Role Play is a form of role playing game where the participants physically act out their characters actions. Come participate or just observe the live action game in progress. Costumes are optional but encouraged. Prizes for best LARP costumes.
Cost: Free with Garden admission. Family friendly event. Live demonstrations and activities for kids. Rain or shine!
Barack Obama: I Did Not. Exchange. Electronic. Mail With That Woman. Secretary Clinton.
Here’s the standard pattern:
Tell a big fat stinkin’ lie.As always, Obama lied when he said he didn’t know about the wrongdoing under his administration until he saw it on the news. Usually, these claims of incompetence are brushed aside by our moral, ethical, and intellectual betters in the media. “He’s the smartest president ever, yet he has no idea what’s going on? Seems legit!” He’s just that awesome.
See if anybody buys it.
If so, move along to the next lie. If not, do a complete 180 while claiming it’s what you’ve said all along.
However, the gatekeepers seem to be taking an unusual interest in this story, even though the people brazenly lying to them are their fellow Democrats. So maybe they’ll keep asking questions. Maybe they’ll risk being called racists. Maybe they’ll extract something resembling the truth out of these corrupt slimeballs. And maybe everybody will finally realize that when Obama says “transparency,” he means the other thing.
◼ 4 reasons the Hillary emails are hurting Obama - Brian Hughes/Washington Examiner @BrianHughesDC
The White House insists that Hillary Clinton's exclusive use of a private email account as secretary of state is not President Obama's problem.
Already, that logic has been punctured.
With each passing day that Clinton chooses to stay silent on why she kept her digital correspondence private, the White House is forced to answer questions on her behalf.
White House aides are clearly frustrated that Obama has gotten engulfed in the controversy with so little time before the entire political conversation turns to 2016.
Yet Obama's problems have only compounded since his messaging team tried to sidestep blame for the latest uproar surrounding secretive Clinton tactics.
Here are the 4 reasons the Hillary emails are so damaging for Obama
Charles in Charge: "It's as if he just wandered into White House and discovered himself as President!" #tcot #pjnet pic.twitter.com/GFntLIlXHv— Michael A Nöthem (@mikandynothem) March 10, 2015
Why Couldn’t Hillary Clinton Just Put Two Email Accounts on One Phone? http://t.co/kM8kbh5C3p pic.twitter.com/WE98o65f0p— Mediaite (@Mediaite) March 10, 2015
67-year-old who recovered from blood clot in brain admits she can't handle 2 email accounts AND WANTS TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.— Razor (@hale_razor) March 10, 2015
Tuesday, March 10, 2015
LA Times Op-Ed California's public unions have too much clout and compensation
...To a substantial extent, these compensation premiums are driven by the rising costs of public employee pensions and healthcare. In Los Angeles, pension costs have risen to nearly 20% of the city's budget from 3% in 2000. Statewide pension liabilities are increasing at a rate of $17 billion a year, which make the state's current cash surplus a mirage.
As the city and state pay more for public services they've already consumed, there are fewer resources left for other public priorities. Government ends up spending more but doing less, which is a governing formula that pleases neither liberals nor conservatives.
What is to be done?...
#waitingforhillary The Press Conference
CLIP: @HillaryClinton statement on personal email: http://t.co/UvmjndonOs Complete video here: http://t.co/Xf8F6AAye0 pic.twitter.com/wDro6w3qWs— CSPAN (@cspan) March 10, 2015
"Sorry I'm late, everyone. I had a ton of files to delete off one of my computers..."— John Hayward (@Doc_0) March 10, 2015
Wait, is the HRC #Hillaryemail backdrop blue or, you know.... pic.twitter.com/DvQM3TWs6u— Stu Loeser (@stuloeser) March 10, 2015
HRC: The vast majority of my email went to gov't employees at gov't addresses. Means they were captured and preserved on system at State.— Bret Baier (@BretBaier) March 10, 2015
Clinton sort-of apologizes for using a private account only. Looking back, says she would not have done it.— Chris Cillizza (@TheFix) March 10, 2015
"Looking back, it would have been better if I hadn't tried to hide the emails I've already destroyed"— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) March 10, 2015
HRC: "I provided all my emails that could possibly be work-related" - 55k pages - "I chose not to keep my private, personal emails"— HowardKurtz (@HowardKurtz) March 10, 2015
So Hillary destroyed her personal emails?— Legal Insurrection (@LegInsurrection) March 10, 2015
First question for Hillary: “If you were a man today…”— Charlie Spiering (@charliespiering) March 10, 2015
WATCH NOW: Clinton says State Department "already had the vast majority" of her emails http://t.co/SY3gE0nZYs pic.twitter.com/o3ZGl1R0EO— The Hill (@thehill) March 10, 2015
"If you were man..." Wow, just wow. #HillaryEmail— Larry O'Connor (@LarryOConnor) March 10, 2015
"Golly Andrea Mitchell, I so totally didn't plan for you to ask that question ahead of time, what a toughie, let me see if I can answer it."— Film Ladd (@FilmLadd) March 10, 2015
Reminder: number of emails "volunteered" by Hillary = zero. She was chased down by State after leaving office and asked for them— John Hayward (@Doc_0) March 10, 2015
Hillary: I only deleted personal emails. TRUST ME!— John Nolte (@NolteNC) March 10, 2015
OMG. THIS WOMAN THINKS YOU CAN'T HAVE TWO EMAIL ACCOUNTS ON A PHONE.— Phil Kerpen (@kerpen) March 10, 2015
Hey #HillaryClinton a five year old knows you can have as many email accounts as U want on one device. This is ridiculous #WakeUpAmerica 👊— Wayne DuPree ★彡 (@WayneDupreeShow) March 10, 2015
Hillary knows how to home brew a server. Hillary does not know you can have two emails on ONE device.— John Nolte (@NolteNC) March 10, 2015
This is Hillary's MOST pathetic email defense yet (Truly, it's ludicrous. Look!); Monica Crowley nails it http://t.co/oOCXZBSYEX— Lori Ziganto (@snarkandboobs) March 10, 2015
"I wanted to only use one phone, for convenience." - Hillary Clinton. FACTCHECK: LIE. https://t.co/Dk6BX97vkr— RB (@RBPundit) March 10, 2015
Well, this raises some questions: Hillary Clinton just two weeks ago claimed to use both an iPhone and a Blackberry- https://t.co/xm0KvCOwqy— Eliana Johnson (@elianayjohnson) March 10, 2015
For #HillaryClinton and her #ReadyForHillary fanatics, that was a disastrous press conference. So unbelievable. pic.twitter.com/m9GTZJWzNd— Shaughn (@Shaughn_A) March 10, 2015
With public'a trust in politicians at record low, Clinton brain trust gambles her dreams on a "trust me" strategy. http://t.co/oesmZNil1a— Ron Fournier (@ron_fournier) March 10, 2015
No one, not even progressive activists, trusts Hillary https://t.co/9s5fglBKfx— Conn Carroll (@conncarroll) March 10, 2015
News Analysis: Hillary Clinton’s Email Defense Turns Defensive http://t.co/iloOlPGztk— NYT National News (@NYTNational) March 10, 2015
Meanwhile: ISIS released a video showing a child executing alleged Israeli spy Mohammad Ismail.
BREAKING NEWS: ISIS released a video showing a child executing alleged Israeli spy Mohammad Ismail. pic.twitter.com/fC2lwUQUoY— Breaking News Feed (@PzFeed) March 10, 2015
BREAKING: ATF Temporarily Pulls Proposal to Ban AR-15 "Green Tip" Ammunition
ATF received unprecedented 80,000 comments against banning AR-15 green tip ammo, has TEMPORARILY pulled proposal http://t.co/K18K7wdwVU #2A— Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) March 10, 2015
◼ After an unprecedented response, the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms has temporarily pulled its proposal to ban common AR-15 M885 "green tip" ammunition. - Katie Pavlich/Townhall
You spoke, we listened. @ATFHQ plans more study on the proposed AP Ammo exemption framework. See more http://t.co/SmRKMYvw7J— ATF HQ (@ATFHQ) March 10, 2015
'You Spoke, We Listened:' ATF Drops Planned Ammo Ban: "You spoke, we listened," tweeted the Bureau of Alcohol,... http://t.co/9IMmHdujTi— National Review (@NROcorner) March 10, 2015
The full story: No AR-15 bullet ban for now thanx to @NRA @RepGoodlatte @ChuckGrassley @NRAILA http://t.co/JMKGRlq4d4 via @DCExaminer— Paul Bedard (@SecretsBedard) March 10, 2015
OBAMA-APPROVED ANTI-BULLYING ADVOCATE TELLS BLACK DOCTOR BEN CARSON ‘SUCK MY D*CK’
◼ Last week, Dr. Ben Carson, a possible 2016 Republican presidential candidate, stepped onto unstable political ground. Asked whether he believes that “being gay is a choice,” Carson stated that he “absolutely” did. - Ben Shapiro/Breitbart
The media, who have an interest in slandering Republican presidential candidates, took Carson’s poorly-articulated answer and used it to slam him repeatedly over the weekend, with Saturday Night Live leading the way, mocking Carson over and over again. But that was nothing compared to the typically vile output of supposed anti-bullying advocate Dan Savage. After laying out a typically illogical complaint comparing the merit of homosexual activity to that of religious living, Savage then stated:
Dear Dr. Carson,KEEP READING
If being gay is a choice, prove it. Choose it. Choose to be gay yourself. Show America how that’s done, Ben, show us how a man can choose to be gay. Suck my dick. Name the time and the place and I’ll bring my dick and a camera crew and you can suck me off and win the argument.
Very sincerely yours,
Sen. Cotton Responds to Obama’s Jibe About Iran Letter: ‘There Are Nothing But Hardliners in Iran’
“Isn’t that the truth?” http://t.co/FUBbwRV2yl pic.twitter.com/YaboU27fiB— Free Beacon (@FreeBeacon) March 10, 2015
◼ Forty-seven GOP senators signed an open letter informing the Iranian regime that they will consider any nuclear agreement that Congress does not approve “as nothing more than an executive agreement between President Obama and [supreme leader] Ayatollah Khamenei.” - CNS
“The next president could revoke such an executive agreement with the stroke of a pen and future Congresses could modify the terms of the agreement at any time,” stated the letter, initiated by Sen. Tom Cotton, a freshman Republican from Arkansas.◼ HOW TOM COTTON’S IRAN LETTER SETS UP ‘CHECKMATE’ ON OBAMA’S IRAN DEAL - Joel Pollak/Breitbart
Responding to Obama’s jibe about a coalition with “the hardliners in Iran,” Cotton said later, “There are nothing but hardliners in Iran, nothing but hardline Islamic extremists who’ve been killing Americans around the world for 35 years.”
“That’s why Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon,” he told CNN’s Jake Tapper.
“If they’ve been the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism for 35 years, imagine what they will do if they have a nuclear umbrella.”
Democrats are pushing back against the letter, circulated by Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) and signed by 47 Senators in all, that warns the Iranian regime that any deal it signs with President Barack Obama could be voided by the next president if it is not ratified by the Senate under the U.S. Constitution. They have enlisted Vice President Joe Biden and even retired Sen. Richard Lugar to disparage the effort. In so doing, they have proved Cotton’s point–and checkmated the administration.
Shorter: Time after time, Obama has told Congress to go to hell. Now Congress is telling Obama to go to hell. http://t.co/slTGVCPsos— Byron York (@ByronYork) March 10, 2015
Barry has been circumventing Congress for 6 years; now 47 U.S. senators decided to circumvent Barry. Seems fair. http://t.co/MxGHsz0cFF— Jason Mattera (@JasonMattera) March 10, 2015
New post: "5 times Democrats undermined Republican presidents with foreign governments” http://t.co/ebyhvLk9XM— Philip Klein (@philipaklein) March 10, 2015
Then: "Dissent is patriotic!" Now: "Dissent is treason!" #47Traitors #47Patriots— Andrew Klavan (@andrewklavan) March 10, 2015
@RBPundit Oops: MMFA pointed out that the Logan Act doesn't apply to members of Congress when Pelosi met with Assad. http://t.co/mJTNGTIyKP— Hunter Pearce (@hunterpearce) March 10, 2015
What about John Kerry kissing the asses of the Sandinistas..in Nicaragua during the Reagan Administration! @JonahNRO pic.twitter.com/eGscsu0JP5— Coaches Hot Seat (@CoachesHotSeat) March 10, 2015
Read @seanmdav, and note that Kennedy was negotiating w/ Communists dedicated to destroying US http://t.co/gQweF4SIJh pic.twitter.com/xfZ3CoYCRg— Benjamin Weingarten (@bhweingarten) March 10, 2015
I'm supposed to be mad that #47traitors want Israel to survive a nuclear Iran. Did I miss SOMETHING?! pic.twitter.com/tKccisuhhD— Steven Crowder (@scrowder) March 10, 2015
.@seanmdav Do environmentalists view Obama as a 'traitor' for negotiating with Iran to build nuclear facilities? Their silence is deafening.— Uri Blago (@UriBlago) March 10, 2015
Pelosi: Don't compare my trip to Syria with GOP's #IranLetter http://t.co/sbiSAkCAbB pic.twitter.com/T1gEoIiMLG— The Hill (@thehill) March 12, 2015
GABBY GIFFORDS’ HUSBAND FAILED SAME BACKGROUND CHECKS HER ATTACKER PASSED
Some media outlets and gun control advocated responded to the report by claiming Loughner’s successful passage of a background check simply proves the background check system isn’t sufficient. But those making this argument miss a very important point: Namely, that Giffords’ husband, Mark Kelly, was turned away twice on gun purchases in 2013 because of certain requirements and stipulations of the current background check system.
Breitbart News previously reported that Kelly went to Tucson, Arizona’s Diamondback Police Supply in February 2013 to show that “background checks are easy.” Kelly brought in a Texas ID instead of an Arizona ID and was denied because the current background check system stipulates that you can only purchase a handgun in the state within which you reside.
Kelly returned with an Arizona ID 13 days later and passed the background check for a 1911-style handgun. He then released a hidden-camera video of how easy it was to purchase the gun but made no mention of the fact that his first attempt was refused.
Last year, Breitbart News reported that Kelly’s highly-publicized AR-15 purchase was terminated as well. Kelly made such a show of his attempt to buy the rifle — telling CNN’s Wolf Blitzer his plan was to hand the gun over to someone else all along — that Diamondback Police Supply owner Douglas MacKinlay cancelled the purchase and refunded Kelly’s money.
Obama attacks Scott Walker after Wisconsin right-to-work move
In a statement, Mr. Obama said the Wisconsin bill is the latest in a “sustained, coordinated assault on unions” led by the wealthy and their friends in government, predicting it will hamper economic growth and harm the middle class moving forward.
But he saved his harshest words for Mr. Walker, a potential 2016 presidential candidate and rising star in the Republican party.
“Wisconsin is a state built by labor, with a proud pro-worker past. So even as its governor claims victory over working Americans, I’d encourage him to try and score a victory for working Americans by taking meaningful action to raise their wages and offer them the security of paid leave,” Mr. Obama said. “That’s how you give hardworking middle-class families a fair shot in the new economy — not by stripping their rights in the workplace, but by offering them all the tools they need to get ahead.”
Mr. Walker shot back and said the president could learn lessons from states such as Wisconsin.
“On the heels of vetoing Keystone Pipeline legislation, which would have paved the way to create thousands of quality, middle-class jobs, the president should be looking to states, like Wisconsin, as an example for how to grow our economy,” he said in a statement. “Our reforms are moving Wisconsin forward and helping create family-supporting jobs for people in our state.”
#9724; Freedom not to choose: Right-to-work proliferates as workers balk at paying costly union dues - Stephen Moore/The Washington Times
Unions and the think tanks they fund are in an understandable panic. History shows that when workers aren’t forced to pay union dues and fees, they usually choose not to.
A right-to-work law does not prohibit unions. There are active, powerful unions in right-to-work states. This law simply gives individual workers the freedom to choose whether to financially support a union as a job condition.