Tuesday, March 16, 2021
Wednesday, June 27, 2018
Eric Holder's Law Firm Launches Investigation into Facebook's Anti-Conservative Bias. What could possibly go wrong?
"If you decide to stick with Mark Zuckerberg, bias is the price you'll have to pay for using his free service."#TuesdayThoughts from @pbolyard on being a conservative @facebook user. https://t.co/qtP0W6mXTk
— PJ Media (@PJMedia_com) June 26, 2018
Saturday, June 23, 2018
What’s striking about these revelations is they want to weaponize our phones to spy on us through the cameras and microphone.
FACEBOOK's Relentless Drive to Track Every Detail of Users' Lives... https://t.co/htcjhnmIVw— DRUDGE REPORT (@DRUDGE_REPORT) June 23, 2018
Here are some of the specific patents discussed in the New York Times article:
- Predicting whether you’re in a romantic relationship by monitoring how often you visit another user’s page and the number of friends you have of the opposite gender
- Using your posts to determine your personality traits, including emotional stability
- Detecting defective pixels or lens scratches on your camera to find a connection with someone else who might be using the same camera
- Detecting interference in the electrical power cable running to your TV to figure out what program is playing
- Detecting your phone’s location in the middle of the night to capture your home address
Considering that Facebook has two billion active users, imagine the data they are amassing. If just a couple of these patents are put to practice, it dramatically increases the personal knowledge they will have about their subscribers. And from previous revelations, they are just as interested in learning personal details about those of us who don't use Facebook by gaining that information from our friends that are on Facebook.
Wednesday, June 13, 2018
We will "ban a way of talking."
"Twitter to Predict What You Want to See, When It Happens" https://t.co/g78R7CfUIq
— James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) June 13, 2018
Sounds Orwellian. We exposed this a few months ago. A Twitter engineer we caught on audio even said they will "ban a way of talking." Another said "it's a product thing we're working on." pic.twitter.com/IUefqj4G3t
Thursday, June 7, 2018
FACEBOOK, AMAZON, GOOGLE AND TWITTER ALL WORK WITH LEFT-WING HATE-GROUP
Amazon is the worst of tech companies empowering SPLC, report says. @Amazon give SPLC “broad policing power over the Amazon Smile charitable program, while claiming to remain unbiased.”
— J Michael Waller (@JMichaelWaller) June 7, 2018
“We remove organizations that the SPLC deems as ineligible.” https://t.co/uckjpP5p6v
...Amazon grants the SPLC that power “because we don’t want to be biased whatsoever,” said the spokeswoman, who could not say whether Amazon considers the SPLC to be unbiased.
The Smile program allows customers to identify a charity to receive 0.5 percent of the proceeds from their purchases on Amazon. Customers have given more than $8 million to charities through the program since 2013, according to Amazon.
Only one participant in the program, the SPLC, gets to determine which other groups are allowed to join it.
Christian legal groups like the Alliance Defending Freedom — which recently successfully represented a Christian baker at the Supreme Court — are barred from the Amazon Smile program, while openly anti-Semitic groups remain, TheDCNF found in May.
One month later, the anti-Semitic groups — but not the Alliance Defending Freedom — are still able to participate in the program....
When the SPLC decided to attack @PragerU, the leftist group "couldn't really come up with any evidence about how dangerous we are, but concluded that we're dangerous. The truth doesn't matter to them." https://t.co/D3Ye3oAITx @PJMedia_com #Trending
— Tyler O'Neil (@Tyler2ONeil) June 8, 2018
Wednesday, June 6, 2018
"This could be a very big problem. If @Facebook granted Huawei special access to social data of Americans this might as well have given it directly to the government of #China"
Posted without comment.https://t.co/M3lsAqYNr9 pic.twitter.com/0mt1UjKmch
— Patrick Stanley (@PatrickWStanley) June 5, 2018
This could be a very big problem. If @Facebook granted Huawei special access to social data of Americans this might as well have given it directly to the government of #China https://t.co/5K86CDpjVE
— Marco Rubio (@marcorubio) June 6, 2018
Tuesday, June 5, 2018
Rep. David Cicilline, the ranking member of the House Judiciary antitrust subcommittee, "Sure looks like Zuckerberg lied to Congress about whether users have 'complete control' over who sees our data on Facebook."
Well, well, well...NOW a Democrat leftist politician knows what it's like when a "progressive" leftist lies through their teeth to you...
— Michael J. Fell (@MichaelJFell) June 5, 2018
Dem lawmaker: ‘Looks like Zuckerberg lied to Congress’ https://t.co/rqDCA6OEdE
Facebook's privacy woes grow in Washington https://t.co/iNEJeVIHVL
— POLITICO (@politico) June 5, 2018
The New York Times reported late Sunday that Facebook may have shared user data with hardware companies as well. The social network "reached data-sharing partnerships with at least 60 device makers — including Apple, Amazon, BlackBerry, Microsoft and Samsung — over the last decade," according to the report.
The story says Facebook began winding down the partnerships in April, but raises questions about whether they violated a 2011 consent decree with the Federal Trade Commission. Under that agreement, the company committed to get users' express affirmative consent before doing anything running counter to their privacy preferences.
Lawmakers of both parties joined Cicilline in registering their displeasure....
Thursday, May 24, 2018
“Facebook continued to explore and implement ways to track users’ location, to track and read their texts, to access and record their microphones on their phones, to track and monitor their usage of competitive apps on their phones, and to track and monitor their calls”
FACEBOOK accused mass surveillance through apps... https://t.co/m6mhM3e9Jp
— DRUDGE REPORT (@DRUDGE_REPORT) May 24, 2018
The claims of what would amount to mass surveillance are part of a lawsuit brought against the company by the former startup Six4Three, listed in legal documents filed at the superior court in San Mateo as part of a court case that has been ongoing for more than two years.
Saturday, May 5, 2018
Facebook will decide what fake news is and then makes sure it's lower on your timeline
#Facebook’s New #Censorship Scheme https://t.co/Yh6B5s4bzU pic.twitter.com/IxiKJUhTSc
— David Icke (@davidicke) May 4, 2018
Facebook will decide what fake news is and then makes sure it's lower on your timeline.https://t.co/J6DWHC7CYJ
— WeAreChange NYC (@WeAreChangeNYC) April 24, 2018
You Won't Believe How #YouTube Is Screwing Its Creators NOW#WRC #WeAreChange #censorship https://t.co/qZlUAMgKAc
— WeAreChange NYC (@WeAreChangeNYC) April 25, 2018
Thursday, April 19, 2018
Obama Campaign Harvested Data from 100 Million More Facebook Users Than Cambridge Analytica
Obama Campaign Harvested Data from 100 Million More Facebook Users Than Cambridge Analytica https://t.co/18a1aF7Lda
— Jim Hoft (@gatewaypundit) April 13, 2018
... in 2012 the Obama campaign harvested data from 190 million Facebook users.
The media cheered the sheer brilliance of the Obama campaign....
Monday, April 16, 2018
Flex your voice RT, share these sources often
Flex your voice RT, share these sources often @DRUDGE_REPORT @BrietbartNews @townhall @campusreform @WashTimes @TwitchyTeam @DailyCaller @theblaze @cnsnews @freebeacon @FoxNews @newsbusters @LifeZette @Judicialwatch @wattsupwiththat @powerlineUS @CR @Americanthinker @PJMedia_com https://t.co/ns3wi02fKB
— Marcel J. van Rossum (@CarrollStandard) April 9, 2018
Sunday, April 15, 2018
The DC’s Stephanie Hamill Exposes Facebook’s Devious Plan To ‘Steal The 2018 Election’ For The Democrats
During one of the hearings, #Zuckerberg said combating election interference was one of his top priorities this year and that he has more confidence that #Facebook’s going to “get this right this year.”
— Anna Bacon (@AnnaBD20) April 14, 2018
So what exactly does Mark Zuckerberg mean by right? https://t.co/1LGAprcmii
Members of Congress grilled CEO Mark Zuckerberg this week over the company’s data privacy issues and also for the network’s alleged bias against conservatives.
During one of the hearings, Zuckerberg said combating election interference was one of his top priorities this year and that he has more confidence that Facebook’s going to “get this right this year.”
So what exactly does Mark Zuckerberg mean by right? He means the public was wrong when it chose Trump in 2016, that Trump supporters should be punished, and that Zuckerberg will do everything in his power to prevent politically incorrect election choices from happening again. That’s what he means....
We too seldom recognize the value of the freedom to hate. Like, I hate Canadians. Do they suffer harm from my hatred of them? No, but I enjoy it. https://t.co/X4h7zglRO9
— The Patriarch Tree (@PatriarchTree) April 15, 2018
Friday, April 13, 2018
CONGRESS IS UNEARTHING FACEBOOK’S TERRIBLE POWER
Saying these #Zuckerberg hearings are about Cambridge Analytica, elections, or even advertising is too simple. The real question for Facebook: “Do you think you’re too powerful?” Brilliant from @jessiwrites https://t.co/rFE7pZkbkX
— Alex Whitcomb (@AlexWhitcomb) April 11, 2018
...The problem Zuckerberg faces is running an empire that’s too big for any one entity to control. The largest virtual public square in the world, one that provides a communications tool to 2.2 billion users is overseen by one individual. Zuckerberg created something that is far bigger than himself, and he–along with the rest of us–failed to account for the unintended consequences in advance. We’re concerned about who gets access to our information, yes. But as yesterday’s Senate hearing revealed, we’re also concerned about many other ways Facebook is impacting our lives. We’re worried our children are becoming addicted to it. We’re concerned it’s quantifying and minimizing important relationships, and leaving us less connected. We are horrified by the images and posts that can crop up the platform, and we’re just as appalled by the idea that one private entity could decide what gets taken down. Now we are tasked collectively with figuring out how to steward this platform into the future, and we don’t think Zuckerberg is up to the task....
Thursday, April 12, 2018
Time to grill Congressional collaborators who've enabled #zuckerberg & other Edutech giants to operate massive #studentdatamining racket
— NewsBusters (@newsbusters) April 12, 2018
Time to grill Congressional collaborators who've enabled #zuckerberg & other Edutech giants to operate massive #studentdatamining racket ==>https://t.co/pmarjwPSUd#stopfeded #fixFERPA pic.twitter.com/eQ5z4VpOBO
— Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) April 11, 2018
Mark Zuckerberg spent more than 10 hours testifying before Congress this week and still didn't answer the most important question about Facebook: How much data does Facebook collect on users -- and non-users? https://t.co/osQvBTjoxr pic.twitter.com/9lYlgrNoeE
— CNNMoney (@CNNMoney) April 12, 2018
And it’s not going to stop after this little “kerfuffle” passes by, as it surely will... https://t.co/qyEmUAn0Qu
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) April 12, 2018
Wednesday, April 11, 2018
Zuckerberg to the American people: Says Obama Staffer Lied About Alliance With Facebook
LIVE COVERAGE: Zuckerberg spars with Congress during second day of testimony https://t.co/BM5PWU5MLf pic.twitter.com/KwRlalegr3
— The Hill (@thehill) April 11, 2018
Congressional Hearing Turns Up Heat... https://t.co/jZntihewop
— DRUDGE REPORT (@DRUDGE_REPORT) April 11, 2018
— NewsBusters (@newsbusters) April 11, 2018
While testifying in front of the Energy and Commerce Committee, Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg said the former Obama campaign staffer who claimed the company allowed the Obama campaign to do things “they wouldn’t have allowed someone else to do because they were on our side” was lying....
Scalise asked:
… One of the lead digital heads of the Obama campaign said recently: “Facebook was surprised we were able to suck out the whole social graph, but they didn't stop us once they realized that was what we were doing. They came to office in the days following election recruiting and were very candid that they allowed us to do things they wouldn't have allowed someone else to do because they were on our side.” Now, that's a direct quote from one of the heads of the Obama digital team. What would she mean by they, Facebook, were on our side?Zuckerberg responded that Facebook “didn't allow the Obama campaign to do anything that any developer on the platform wouldn't have otherwise been able to do.”
$FB CEO Mark Zuckerberg says that the site "collects data from people who have not signed up for Facebook for security purposes." pic.twitter.com/ym4STsaoif
— Neil Cavuto (@TeamCavuto) April 11, 2018
Zuckerberg to the American people pic.twitter.com/7p3FFoD0B1
— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) April 11, 2018
"Historical facts should never be censored, and Facebook should be ashamed of this behavior."
— PJ Media (@PJMedia_com) April 10, 2018
Members of Congress won't discuss this story today, but @Tyler2ONeil will. #Zuckerberg https://t.co/iiPR5tvy3g
Check your settings… pic.twitter.com/xTKxaOFICG
— MATT DRUDGE (@DRUDGE) April 11, 2018
Zuckerberg Acknowledges 'Error' in Targeting Diamond and Silk https://t.co/cSlqONMCTN
— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) April 11, 2018
Mark Zuckerberg openly admitted that Silicon Valley is “extremely left leaning” and that political bias is a problem he is concerned about. pic.twitter.com/wdOpcIbYqy
— Gab: Free Speech Social Network (@getongab) April 11, 2018
Tony Cardenas just asked Mark Zuckerberg to be a "leader" and help create more regulations for social media users. If the regulations in question are ones that Facebook approves and advises on, it is bad news for all future tech companies.
— Pardes Seleh (@PardesSeleh) April 11, 2018
.@senatorleahy grilled #Zuckerberg on privacy and while gathering his own Facebook data on his campaign website https://t.co/LofwcCOrzT
— Competitive Enterprise Institute (@ceidotorg) April 11, 2018
“...We Vermonters believe in privacy,” Sen. Leahy proudly proclaimed.
Yet, a quick visit to his website, https://www.leahyforvermont.com/, with the Chrome extension “Facebook Pixel Helper” reveals that Sen. Leahy has a Facebook pixel, invisible to users, that gathers user data of Facebook users who visit the site. (For a quick primer on what “pixels” do, visit Facebook’s resource guide on the data-gathering tool.)
That’s right, if you visit Senator Leahy’s campaign website, it’s likely your data, including your demographics and what pages you looked at on the site, have been placed into a custom data targeting audience by Leahy’s team....
GOP lawmaker shreds Zuckerberg for labeling conservative content: "Diamond and Silk is not terrorism" https://t.co/TklPrZgSWS pic.twitter.com/eWRqsY1O9H
— The Hill (@thehill) April 11, 2018
Watch Ted Cruz Confront Zuckerberg On Facebook's Huge Political Bias
"A great many Americans...are deeply concerned that Facebook and other tech companies are engaged in a pervasive pattern of bias and political censorship," said Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz. The Facebook CEO responded that he is committed to free expression of ideas on the social network.
True. pic.twitter.com/qgnIq9sZaj
— Robert Barnes (@Barnes_Law) April 11, 2018
Watch Ted Cruz Confront Zuckerberg On Facebook's Huge Political Bias: https://t.co/eJtPe4561m
— MARK SIMONE (@MarkSimoneNY) April 11, 2018
TED CRUZ MAKES MARK SQUIRM! https://t.co/Y1VUL21XFa
— DRUDGE REPORT (@DRUDGE_REPORT) April 11, 2018
Senator Grills: How Do You Define 'Hate'? https://t.co/xpxtcWffJa
— DRUDGE REPORT (@DRUDGE_REPORT) April 11, 2018
Zuckerboost pic.twitter.com/6T6w0nK7GH
— Pardes Seleh (@PardesSeleh) April 11, 2018
#Orwell #Zuckerberg https://t.co/5dCJykqArx
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) April 11, 2018
Key moments from Mark Zuckerberg's Senate testimony https://t.co/UOr13TazwM pic.twitter.com/K3itin9cN9
— POLITICO (@politico) April 11, 2018
"Congress should take a long look at itself and its own processes that have allowed Facebook and its power to grow unchecked," writes @1PatriciaMurphy. https://t.co/2vkGWuzujF
— Roll Call (@rollcall) April 11, 2018
What's the matter? Don't you trust Facebook? https://t.co/5yAS5Vorju
— wretchardthecat (@wretchardthecat) April 11, 2018
Zuckerberg: Facebook contacted by Mueller probe https://t.co/mbfRFt2acp pic.twitter.com/gLmeaAtoqw
— POLITICO (@politico) April 11, 2018
Recently obtained footage of Mark #Zuckerberg during a brief recess at today’s #Facebook hearing on #CapitolHill. pic.twitter.com/xdj1vUMvQ0
— Chris Stigall (@ChrisStigall) April 11, 2018
If Cambridge Analytica accessed your Facebook data, here's what to do: https://t.co/lP5CXPBFBK pic.twitter.com/nB0nlAUXKE
— Lifehacker (@lifehacker) April 11, 2018
Organizing for America has more of your data and for longer. Just a reminder. https://t.co/VUYIqJgBqO
— Melissa Mackenzie 🌐 (@MelissaTweets) April 11, 2018
Associated Press photographer Andrew Harni got a clear shot of Zuckerberg's notes as he left the table during a break Tuesday. Some notable entries include how he should defend Facebook. "[If attacked: Respectfully, I reject that. Not who we are.] https://t.co/ybpMyhxlYM pic.twitter.com/pGN8wamVw6
— CBS News (@CBSNews) April 10, 2018
Mark Zuckerberg’s Insufferable Tripe https://t.co/Puh0KaJQ3T via @RichLowry pic.twitter.com/8sd0IWHvuz
— National Review (@NRO) April 11, 2018
Read this from @FranklinFoer on how Facebook's problems are fueling a change in how we view techologyhttps://t.co/PF0rHBx2eI
— Chris Cillizza (@CillizzaCNN) April 11, 2018
MONTAGE: Zuckerberg Doesn't Know, His Team Will Get Back To You... https://t.co/taAUzA7H2l
— DRUDGE REPORT (@DRUDGE_REPORT) April 11, 2018
Full text of Zuckerberg's remarks to Congress:#DeleteFacebook https://t.co/fOHNU7IQA0
— RedBoat (@edsredboat) April 10, 2018
Tuesday, April 10, 2018
Here's how to watch Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg's Senate testimony today
In about 2 hours...
— CSPAN (@cspan) April 10, 2018
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies before @senatecommerce & @senjudiciary – LIVE at 2:15pm ET on C-SPAN3, @cspanRadio & online here: https://t.co/mKRk6i9Bj8 pic.twitter.com/NhFn1Y6yQi
Here's how to watch Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg's Senate testimony today:https://t.co/DGZD2C2WVg
— IJR (@TheIJR) April 10, 2018
More pre-Zuckerberg hearing reading:
— Lawfare (@lawfareblog) April 10, 2018
- The Cambridge Analytica-Facebook Debacle: A Legal Primer, by @andrewkwoods: https://t.co/ex2RtdMjrB
- How Cambridge Analytica, Facebook and Other Privacy Abuses Could Have Been Prevented, by @djweitzner: https://t.co/bj6gcWLrWM
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse and Reps. Kurt Schrader and Joe Kennedy III are members of the House and Senate committees that will question Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg. The three of them hold shares in the social media platform. https://t.co/CMzpm7XLn1
— Roll Call (@rollcall) April 10, 2018
As Zuckerberg faces Congress, Claire McCaskill is "besties" with Facebook execs and beneficiary of their cash https://t.co/C81p2w6ZNo by @emilyjashinsky pic.twitter.com/EjqlXIpE6w
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) April 10, 2018
Monday, April 9, 2018
"An apology from Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg is not enough. "They have not changed and they continue to make billions of dollars."
Digital Trends Editor-In-Chief Jeremy Kaplan (@SmashDawg) told us at @FoxBusiness that an apology from Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg is not enough. "They have not changed and they continue to make billions of dollars." pic.twitter.com/8fdhpLflZg
— Neil Cavuto (@TeamCavuto) April 9, 2018
Full text: Mark Zuckerberg testimony to Congress on Cambridge Analyticahttps://t.co/WPIxgAkxbl pic.twitter.com/L6pa7mpMYI
— POLITICO (@politico) April 9, 2018
Sunday, April 8, 2018
‘Unsafe to the community’: Facebook censors pro-Trump Diamond and Silk
.@DiamondandSilk have been corresponding since September 7, 2017, with @facebook (owned by Mark Zuckerberg), about their bias censorship and discrimination against D&S brand page. Finally after several emails, chats, phone calls, appeals, beating around the bush, lies, and......
— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018
....... giving us the run around, Facebook gave us another bogus reason why Millions of people who have liked and/or followed our page no longer receives notification and why our page, post and video reach was reduced by a very large percentage. Here is the reply from..........
— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018
...Facebook said: "This decision is final and it is not appeal-able in any way." (Note: This is the exact wording that FB emailed to us.)
— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018
So our questions to Facebook (Mark Zuckerberg) are:
1. What is unsafe about two Blk-women supporting the @POTUS @realDonaldTrump?
2.....
.....Our FB page has been created since December 2014, when exactly did the content and the brand become unsafe to the community?
— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018
3. When you say "community" are you referring to the Millions who liked and followed our page?
4. What content on our page was in violation?
5....
.....If our content and brand was so unsafe to the community, why is the option for us to boost our content and spend money with FB to enhance our brand page still available? Maybe FB should give us a refund since FB censored our reach.
— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018
6.....
.....Lastly, didn't FB violate their own policy when FB stopped sending notifications to the Millions of people who liked and followed our brand page?
— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018
This is deliberate bias censorship and discrimination. These tactics are unacceptable and we want answers!
~Diamond and Silk pic.twitter.com/wQqtub8Ges
Hello, there is your unroll: https://t.co/Ml6NIAqyxF
— Thread Reader Bot (@threadreaderapp) April 7, 2018
Talk to you soon. 🤖
"provocative"
— Ali Alexander 👑 (@ali) April 8, 2018
"controversial"
All words used to malign people. Terms used by elites used, scientifically, to block most people from critically making their own decision on if the source's contents is legitimate or illegitimate.
‘Unsafe to the community’: Facebook takes on pro-Trump Diamond and Silk https://t.co/703MoeSTV6 via @american_mirror
— Joel B. Pollak (@joelpollak) April 8, 2018
.@DiamondandSilk FURIOUS After Facebook Reveals Why Their Content Has Been Censored https://t.co/DtwJ6a0bB9
— Jim Hoft (@gatewaypundit) April 8, 2018
....... giving us the run around, Facebook gave us another bogus reason why Millions of people who have liked and/or followed our page no longer receives notification and why our page, post and video reach was reduced by a very large percentage. Here is the reply from..........
— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018
...Facebook said: "This decision is final and it is not appeal-able in any way." (Note: This is the exact wording that FB emailed to us.)
— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018
So our questions to Facebook (Mark Zuckerberg) are:
1. What is unsafe about two Blk-women supporting the @POTUS @realDonaldTrump?
2.....
.....Our FB page has been created since December 2014, when exactly did the content and the brand become unsafe to the community?
— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018
3. When you say "community" are you referring to the Millions who liked and followed our page?
4. What content on our page was in violation?
5....
.....If our content and brand was so unsafe to the community, why is the option for us to boost our content and spend money with FB to enhance our brand page still available? Maybe FB should give us a refund since FB censored our reach.
— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018
6.....
.....Lastly, didn't FB violate their own policy when FB stopped sending notifications to the Millions of people who liked and followed our brand page?
— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018
This is deliberate bias censorship and discrimination. These tactics are unacceptable and we want answers!
~Diamond and Silk pic.twitter.com/wQqtub8Ges
Hello, there is your unroll: https://t.co/Ml6NIAqyxF
— Thread Reader Bot (@threadreaderapp) April 7, 2018
Talk to you soon. 🤖
"provocative"
— Ali Alexander 👑 (@ali) April 8, 2018
"controversial"
All words used to malign people. Terms used by elites used, scientifically, to block most people from critically making their own decision on if the source's contents is legitimate or illegitimate.
Saturday, April 7, 2018
Pulse nightclub shooting survivors sue Google, Facebook, Twitter over ‘material support’ to ISIS
Pulse nightclub shooting survivors sue Google, Facebook, Twitter over ‘material support’ to ISIS https://t.co/RxOGz8bV9r
— FOX & friends (@foxandfriends) April 6, 2018
...In a lawsuit filed Wednesday in Orlando’s federal courthouse, 16 victims of the June 12, 2016 shooting -- the second deadliest in American history -- claim that the three tech giants were responsible for letting ISIS disseminate propaganda on their platforms, thus providing “material support” to the terror group, in violation of the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA).
Such support, the suit alleges, let gunman Omar Mateen carry out his attack, which left 49 people dead and another 58 injured, the Orlando Sentinel reported. Mateen was killed in a shootout with responding police officers....