Wednesday, July 24, 2013

The Censorship Election How the Broadcast Networks Buried the Bad News That Threatened Barack Obama's Quest for a Second Term

President Obama won re-election last November despite handicaps that would have doomed other incumbents: a terrible economy, historic unemployment, a soaring national debt, the unpopularity of ObamaCare, and debacles such as his administration’s inept handling of the September 11 attacks in Benghazi, Libya, that left a U.S. ambassador and three other Americans dead. - Media Research Center

In a typical presidential election year, most of the media’s scrutiny falls on the incumbent, and the campaign becomes referendum on the administration’s performance during the previous four years. But in 2012, the networks failed to incorporate critical examinations of Obama’s record into their campaign narrative, an editorial approach that neatly dovetailed with the Democrat’s strategy of making the election into a referendum on challenger Mitt Romney, not the sitting President.

Instead of covering the news fairly, the networks covered up news that might have hurt Obama’s re-election chances. It was an audacious act of media censorship that could well have changed the outcome of the 2012 election.



Collusion: How the Media Stole the 2012 Election by Brent Bozell and Tim Graham

Interview: Brent Bozell on Collusion: How the Media Stole the 2012 Election - Ed Driscoll/PJMedia