Tuesday, March 8, 2016

API Liberty Summit: Most recent speaker announcement

Monday, March 7, 2016

Would you commit to buy a car, a house or even a jacket without knowing the price? That's why an Orange County supervisor has proposed a measure requiring a cost analysis of all county initiatives.



At the state level, the Legislative Analyst’s Office has the responsibility to provide a “fiscal impact” analysis – that is, information to voters as to the costs to taxpayers of passing a proposition.

But this isn’t currently required at the local level. And those backing attractive sounding, but costly, measures like it that way. They prefer to keep the public in the dark. If a county measure promises to create new parks in every neighborhood, it may sound great, but taxpayers should know what it will cost them before they cast a vote.

Orange County Supervisor Andrew Do deserves credit for proposing a measure that would require a cost analysis by the county’s Auditor Controller for all county initiatives, and his colleagues deserve praise for agreeing to place it on the June ballot for voter approval.

Judge Jeanine Slams Romney: 'The Establishment Is Panicked' About Trump, But 'Not For Us'



Ron Nehring: It's clear @tedcruz has the momentum



In last night's Democratic debate, Hillary Clinton misled the American people about liability for gun manufacturers.

Sen. Bernie Sanders, to his credit, didn't take the bait, saying that attempting to hold gun manufacturers responsible for the acts of criminals is really about "ending gun manufacturing in America."