If you're a reader who still takes Rolling Stone seriously after this, you're more of a problem than they are.

Rolling Stone retracts its controversial sexual assault story following external investigation http://t.co/aWh1EHUoGL pic.twitter.com/MSuXAkEynG

— Mashable (@mashable) April 6, 2015

Rolling Stone retracts its U-Va. rape story after a new investigation finds layers of journalistic lapses http://t.co/b2FrBrhGf6

— Washington Post (@washingtonpost) April 6, 2015

Columbia's #UVA Rape Report: Jackie Lied. End of Story? #RollingStone http://t.co/t4yMDGODXT
— Jim Treacher (@jtLOL) April 6, 2015

"Journalistic failure" - Rolling Stone officially retracts Virginia campus rape article http://t.co/YQCfQirEQV pic.twitter.com/jeHfS02XMm

— BBC News US (@BBCNewsUS) April 6, 2015

Rieder: Rolling Stone's colossal journalism meltdown http://t.co/yjKSeyB11b

— USA TODAY (@USATODAY) April 6, 2015

[Eugene Volokh] Libel law and the Rolling Stone / UVA alleged gang rape story — an update, in light of the Col... http://t.co/DPkzgveUc0
— Volokh Conspiracy (@VolokhC) April 6, 2015

If you're a reader who still takes Rolling Stone seriously after this, you're more of a problem than they are.
— John Hayward (@Doc_0) April 6, 2015

16 things we learned from the review of the Rolling Stone gang-rape story http://t.co/YifvaAPW1b by @AsheSchow
— Leslie ن (@LADowd) April 6, 2015