Hillary Clinton on releasing transcripts: "I'll look into it." pic.twitter.com/sHyE3UqRkE
— POLITICO Video (@POLITICOvideo) February 5, 2016
Why won’t Hillary Clinton release the transcripts of those paid speeches? https://t.co/PBCa8Fwk9F pic.twitter.com/BHB6z1ZEEa
— Chris Cillizza (@TheFix) February 8, 2016
Huh. https://t.co/CVvOYNsmLd pic.twitter.com/fyfumfoI46
— Josh Greenman (@joshgreenman) February 8, 2016
At least four of Clinton's contracts include a clause stating a transcript would be produced for Clinton and the former secretary of state would own them and control their release, according to contracts obtained by McClatchy.
"The sponsor will transcribe Speaker's remarks as they are being delivered, which would be solely for the Speaker's records," according to her contract with the University of Buffalo, which paid her $275,000.
'So bad at this': Hillary's defense of not releasing speech transcripts is predictable and 'terrible' https://t.co/nlTqyYCVNU
— TwitchyTeam (@TwitchyTeam) February 7, 2016
Hillary on transcripts: "Let everybody who's ever given a speech to any private group... we'll all release them at the same time."
— Rick Klein (@rickklein) February 7, 2016
FLASH: Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Resists Releasing Transcripts From Goldman Speeches https://t.co/5jWbnRFvOa via @NYTPolitics #tcot
— Bill Postmus (@billpostmus) February 6, 2016
Exclusive image of Hillary Clinton "looking into" turning over her Goldman Sachs speech transcripts. pic.twitter.com/tn5RCjonSP
— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) February 5, 2016
I was at that UNLV speech. I live-tweeted it, in fact. She was paid $225K for banalities.That transcript? Worthless. https://t.co/pYpBSCqL8P
— Jon Ralston (@RalstonReports) February 8, 2016
