Showing posts with label Liberty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Liberty. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 22, 2018

The world has forgotten the Ladies in White.



Sunday, July 10, 2016

Friday, July 10, 2015

The Sweet Cakes case never was in the court system at all. And if that reassures you, it shouldn’t. The truth is far more threatening to liberty.

Trial by agency - neoneocon

The case of the Sweet Cakes bakers in Oregon who were ordered to pay $135,000 damages for not baking a cake for a gay wedding, and to also submit to a gag order, seemed unusually Draconian to me. I hadn’t read about it in detail, but I figured it had something to do with the liberalism of the Oregon courts. That turns out to have been incorrect, as ◼ this article by David French makes clear, because the case never was in the court system at all.

And if that reassures you, it shouldn’t. The truth is far more threatening to liberty. Our justice system, as expressed through the courts, is far from perfect, but the system of trial by extra-judicial agency or board that is becoming more and more common in these high-profile cases lacks many of the procedural safeguards that have been built into the court system over hundreds of years...KEEP READING













Tuesday, May 12, 2015

The case for conservative civil disobedience



Review of "By the People: Rebuilding Liberty Without Permission" by Charles Murray

From the tea party to Occupy Wall Street to #BlackLivesMatter, America has spent much of this young century questioning its premises. And as the battles over federal spending, economic inequality and racial injustice continue, linkCharles Murray comes forward to identify another threat to the nation’s purpose and self-image: the rise of the regulatory state, a rapacious shadow government that has left us “at the end of the American project as the founders intended it.”

Murray, a political scientist and professional controversy magnet at the American Enterprise Institute, is known for link“Losing Ground,” which deemed the welfare state a failure; link“The Bell Curve,” which linked intelligence, race and socioeconomic outcomes; and link“Coming Apart,” which declared that white America is torn by class and values. In link“By the People,” he not only offers a bleak assessment of the health of American democracy but — and here is where things get interesting — calls for civil disobedience aimed at rehabilitating it.

Some may think of civil disobedience as a tactic employed mainly in the service of liberal causes — think civil rights or antiwar efforts — but Murray exhorts conservatives to issue “a declaration of limited resistance to the existing government,” on the grounds that it has lost legitimacy. If link“Atlas Shrugged” had been written by a despondent social scientist instead of a dyspeptic novelist, it would read a lot like “By the People.”... KEEP READING
_______________

By the People: Rebuilding Liberty Without Permission - Publisher: Crown Forum (May 12, 2015) Available at Amazon

The American way of life, built on individual liberty and limited government, is on life support.

American freedom is being gutted. Whether we are trying to run a business, practice a vocation, raise our families, cooperate with our neighbors, or follow our religious beliefs, we run afoul of the government—not because we are doing anything wrong but because the government has decided it knows better. When we object, that government can and does tell us, “Try to fight this, and we’ll ruin you.”

In this provocative book, acclaimed social scientist and bestselling author Charles Murray shows us why we can no longer hope to roll back the power of the federal government through the normal political process. The Constitution is broken in ways that cannot be fixed even by a sympathetic Supreme Court. Our legal system is increasingly lawless, unmoored from traditional ideas of “the rule of law.” The legislative process has become systemically corrupt no matter which party is in control.

But there’s good news beyond the Beltway. Technology is siphoning power from sclerotic government agencies and putting it in the hands of individuals and communities. The rediversification of American culture is making local freedom attractive to liberals as well as conservatives. People across the political spectrum are increasingly alienated from a regulatory state that nakedly serves its own interests rather than those of ordinary Americans.

The even better news is that federal government has a fatal weakness: It can get away with its thousands of laws and regulations only if the overwhelming majority of Americans voluntarily comply with them. Murray describes how civil disobedience backstopped by legal defense funds can make large portions of the 180,000-page Federal Code of Regulations unenforceable, through a targeted program that identifies regulations that arbitrarily and capriciously tell us what to do. Americans have it within their power to make the federal government an insurable hazard like hurricanes and floods, leaving us once again free to live our lives as we see fit.

By the People’s hopeful message is that rebuilding our traditional freedoms does not require electing a right-thinking Congress or president, nor does it require five right-thinking justices on the Supreme Court. It can be done by we the people, using America’s unique civil society to put government back in its proper box.

Saturday, May 9, 2015

"We don't compromise America's bedrock principles...."



Megyn Kelly Indirectly Responds to O’Reilly on Geller: We Don’t Compromise Our Values

"We don't compromise America's bedrock principles.... Some in this country have been so busy trying to figure out how to avoid causing any religion any offense they have forgotten what is offensive to Americans, namely those who would trample on OUR core ideals. In America we stand for LIBERTY, and freedom, to offend, to provoke, to persuede, and to defy."










MSNBC Did WHAT To Pamela Geller? (VIDEO)



Chris Hayes at MSNBC defended Pamela Geller this week. - Kevin Jackson/The BlackSphere
MSNBC’S HAYES: ‘I DON’T CARE’ IF CARTOON CONTEST WAS PROVOCATION, IT’S ‘IMPORTANT’ - Ian Hanchett/Breitbart
As several conservatives lambasted Pamela Geller this week after terrorists tried to shoot her dead, far left crank Chris Hayes from MSNBC actually defended Pamela Geller this week. - Gateway Pundit

Spencer and Geller Are No Longer Simply Counter-Jihadists - BFH/IOTW

A funny thing happened on the way to Garland, Texas. Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller transformed from counter-jihadists into Geiger-counters, instruments that are able to detect two deadly elements – Islamium and Stupidium....

Saturday, February 28, 2015

At CPAC, Mark Levin said Harry Reid is "running circles around the Republicans" because the GOP has "no principles, no strategy and no guts."





Speaking at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) on Saturday, Levin dubbed Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) "one of the most despicable, dumbest men to ever be leader in the Senate,” but added that Reid is "running circles around the Republicans." - THE HILL

"That's what happens when you have no principles, no strategy and no guts," Levin said of Congressional Republicans. "It's time for a new Republican Party.”

"No more excuses. No more whining. No more lying to get you elected. No more crony deals with the U.S. Chamber of crony capitalism," Levin said, taking a political shot at the business community powerhouse U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Thursday, August 14, 2014

"The town of Ferguson...is the scene of an unfolding drama that will be cited for years to come as a what-not-to-do manual for police forces...The dominant visual aspect of the story...has been the sight of overpowering police forces confronting unarmed protesters who are seen waving signs or just their hands."

Police Militarization in Ferguson — and Your Town - Walter Olson/CATO Institute
Why armored vehicles in a Midwestern inner suburb?

Federal grants drive police militarization. In 2012, as I was able to establish in moments through an online search, St. Louis County (of which Ferguson is a part) got a Bearcat armored vehicle and other goodies this way. The practice can serve to dispose of military surplus (though I’m told the Bearcat is not military surplus, but typically purchased new) and it sometimes wins the gratitude of local governments, even if they are too strapped for cash to afford more ordinary civic supplies (and even if they are soon destined to be surprised by the high cost of maintaining gear intended for armed combat).
The left professes ignorance about conservative, libertarian concerns over police militarization - Noah Rothman/HotAir
Among right-of-center elected officials, several have spoken out:

“Reporters should never be detained — a free press is too important — simply for doing their jobs,” Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) wrote on his Facebook on Thursday. “Civil liberties must be protected, but violence is not the answer.”

Together, we should all mourn the loss of life in Ferguson, Missouri and work to keep our communities safe and free. Police officers risk their lives every day to keep us safe, and any time a young man loses his life in a confrontation with law enforcement, it is tragic.
The famously libertarian congressman Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI) expressed great dismay over the situation unfolding in Missouri:

Images & reports out of #Ferguson are frightening. Is this a war zone or a US city? Gov't escalates tensions w/military equipment & tactics.

— Justin Amash (@repjustinamash) August 14, 2014

Many were confused by Sen. Rand Paul’s (R-KY) apparent silence on the situation in Ferguson. It turned out that he was penning a definitive article for Time in which he insisted that the police must be demilitarized....

It is shocking to learn today that so many on the left appear utterly unaware of the vigorous debate conservatives have been engaging in over the increasing militarization and heavy-handedness of the police. The conservative columnist S.E. Cupp has compiled a fairly comprehensive list of voices on the right who have sounded the alarm over police forces exceeding their authority.
We Must Demilitarize the Police - Sen. Rand Paul/TIME
There is a systemic problem with today’s law enforcement.

Not surprisingly, big government has been at the heart of the problem. Washington has incentivized the militarization of local police precincts by using federal dollars to help municipal governments build what are essentially small armies—where police departments compete to acquire military gear that goes far beyond what most of Americans think of as law enforcement.

This is usually done in the name of fighting the war on drugs or terrorism. The Heritage Foundation’s Evan Bernick wrote in 2013 that, “the Department of Homeland Security has handed out anti-terrorism grants to cities and towns across the country, enabling them to buy armored vehicles, guns, armor, aircraft, and other equipment.”

Bernick continued, “federal agencies of all stripes, as well as local police departments in towns with populations less than 14,000, come equipped with SWAT teams and heavy artillery.”

...The militarization of our law enforcement is due to an unprecedented expansion of government power in this realm. It is one thing for federal officials to work in conjunction with local authorities to reduce or solve crime. It is quite another for them to subsidize it.

Americans must never sacrifice their liberty for an illusive and dangerous, or false, security. This has been a cause I have championed for years, and one that is at a near-crisis point in our country.
How America’s Police Became an Army: The 1033 Program - Newsweek
The Pentagon Equipped Ferguson’s Police Dept. - The Fiscal Times

EARLIER:
DEPT OF AGRICULTURE ORDERS SUBMACHINE GUNS WITH 30 ROUND MAGAZINES - WHY?
1.6 Billion Rounds Of Ammo For Homeland Security? It's Time For A National Conversation
A May 7th solicitation by the U.S. Department of Agriculture seeks "the commercial acquisition of submachine guns [in] .40 Cal. S&W." - Breitbart
Why Is the Post Office Buying Bullets? - Bloomberg Business Week 4/21/14
This Is Why NOAA Supposedly Ordered 46,000 Rounds Of Ammunition - Business Insider 8/14/12
National Weather Service Follows DHS In Huge Ammo Purchase - Infowars 8/14/12

Thursday, July 3, 2014

On America's birthday, do we still believe in America?

Americans are in a period of amazingly negative thinking about the state of our country. - Newt Gingrich/CNN

A recent Gallup analysis drove home how deep and how threatening the current mood is.

Gallup asked Americans in early June how much confidence they had in our nation's institutions. The answer: not much. Only 30% had "a great deal" or "quite a lot of confidence" in the Supreme Court. Just 29% felt that way about the presidency. And an abysmal 7% had faith in the Congress....

This Fourth of July weekend, we need to remember what our Founding Fathers did to create the liberty we enjoy and dedicate ourselves to a new burst of freedom and a new wave of political reform that cleans up the corruption and re-establishes the right of every American to dream and to work to fulfill that dream.

Friday, April 11, 2014

So what is it that Republicans stand for?

What Republicans Stand For - RedState

We stand for many things, to list them all out would be quite the task. But it all springs forth from our founding. We stand for life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

We stand for life, in that we stand for the dignity of the individual. We stand for life by acknowledging the uniqueness of each individual, embracing them for who they are, rather than what purpose they might suit for the collective. We stand for life in the defense of our nation through the sacrifice of a volunteer military.

We stand for life when we demand that patients and doctors make medical decisions rather than government bureaus and boards....

We stand for liberty. We stand for liberty of the individual within the state, the state within the nation, and our nation within the world. We believe that choices that affect the individual do not need to be decided by the collective.

We believe all are born into the liberty our nation offers, regardless of race or creed.

We believe that liberty does not equal license, as license would no doubt curtail the liberty of others. We stand for this liberty in the church pew, in the corporate office, and in the public square.

...We stand for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, just as our forefathers envisioned. We do so with the understanding that man is flawed, and that our liberty comes with a requirement that we be responsible for our own actions.

What do you think? ◼ Answer on our Facebook page...

Thursday, February 6, 2014

Time hasn’t dimmed liberty set afire in Boston Harbor


The enduring spirit of the Tea Parties - Ben S. Carson/Washinton Times

...The concept of cutting back on government expenditures was as foreign to the British as it is to our government today, which provides lip service but no meaningful action.
Why do so many members of the political class go to such great lengths to demonize the Tea Party?

It is not a sophisticated political organization, but rather consists of a loosely knit group of American citizens from many backgrounds who are not ready to relinquish the power of the people into the hands of government entities whose interests and values do not seem to coincide with theirs.

I think it is because certain politicians have forgotten that they work for us rather than the other way around. These politicians are deeply offended by anyone who would dare challenge their “wisdom” and authority....

Thursday, July 11, 2013

Mark Levin's opening monologue about "The Liberty Amendments, Restoring the American Republic." Take a listen.

This is fantastic. For the first time Mark Levin begins to discuss his much awaited new book, The Liberty Amendments, and describes a process we can use to turn back the tide on this leviathan of a federal government we have. And the federal government will have no say about it. - THE RIGHT SCOOP

In short, the founders made a way in the Constitution for the states to amend the Constitution WITHOUT the Federal Government’s involvement. It’s not a constitutional convention, but rather a convention for amending the Constitution. Mark Levin believes this is the only way back to a constitutional republic but he’s under no illusion that it will be easy. In fact, he said there has been at least one attempt to do this and it was not successful.

Saturday, May 4, 2013

It’s not just about guns, it’s about liberty.



NRA’s new liberty culture war not like the old culture war - Le-gal In-sur-rec-tion

It makes sense from a strategic point of view because it ties into the somewhat libertarian trend among conservatives and definitely Tea Party supporters focused on individual autonomy and self-reliance. It also puts the purpose of the 2nd Amendment, freedom from tyranny, in a broader social context of an overreaching government.

THESE ARE THE FACES OF THE NRA CONVENTION THAT THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA WON’T SHOW YOU - The Blaze

Watch the mainstream media’s coverage of the 2013 NRA Convention — if there is any — and you will almost certainly not meet any of the gun owners TheBlaze is about to introduce you to. Despite the stereotypes thrown around about gun owners in America, we found a remarkably diverse, patriotic crowd at the event in Houston Saturday who shattered the image anti-gun advocates have carefully crafted for “gun nuts.”

Without having to seek them out, we found gun owners old, young, black, white as well as a lot of military veterans. However, they all had one thing in common — they are not happy about the way gun owners in America are portrayed in the media.

Mark Levin Addresses NRA Convention in Houston - Townhall

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

ObamaCare's Great Awakening: HHS tells religious believers to go to hell. The public notices.

What the law does cement is the principle that the government will decide for everyone what "health care" must mean. The entire thrust of ObamaCare is to standardize benefits and how they must be paid for and provided, regardless of individual choices or ethical convictions. - Wall St. Journal

The political furor over President Obama's birth-control mandate continues to grow, even among those for whom contraception poses no moral qualms, and one needn't be a theologian to understand why. The country is being exposed to the raw political control that is the core of the Obama health-care plan, and Americans are seeing clearly for the first time how this will violate pluralism and liberty....

The White House is now trying to cauterize the political damage and saying it is open to some "compromise" on its own contraception decision. But the rule is already final. HHS tried to sell it as a compromise when it was announced, and in any case HHS would revive this coercion whenever it is politically convenient some time in Mr. Obama's second term. Religious liberty won't be protected from the entitlement state until ObamaCare is repealed.