California gains just 800 jobs in June... https://t.co/j4fGX42253— DRUDGE REPORT (@DRUDGE_REPORT) July 20, 2018
Saturday, July 21, 2018
Every now and then the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals — arguably the nation’s most progressive federal circuit — can offer up a legal surprise. Yesterday, it gave us a legal shock, when a divided panel of its judges affirmed last year’s federal district-court injunction temporarily blocking enforcement of California’s confiscatory ban on so-called large-capacity magazines.
Under California law, any person who possesses a legally purchased magazine capable of holding more than ten rounds of ammunition must either remove the magazine from the state, sell it to a licensed firearm dealer, or hand it over to law enforcement. Those citizens who retained their magazines after the law went into effect risked a fine or up to one year’s imprisonment in county jail.
The district court’s 66-page opinion was a legal tour-de-force that not only dismantled California’s justifications for the ban, but also reiterated and reinforced the constitutional and historical basis for the right to keep and bear arms....
Justice Department, gun rights groups clash after assault weapons deadline passes https://t.co/5P0eX2yhnP— The Sacramento Bee (@sacbee_news) July 21, 2018
Former Bush and Obama Weigh in on Subpoenaing the Helsinki Interpreter https://t.co/n6Vf5hwoJn— RedState (@RedState) July 21, 2018
Friday, July 20, 2018
If you look at Trump's actions in that context, what he says and what he does aren't so strange. His strategy should be clear by now to all those except those (unfortunately many) who deliberately don't want to understand it.
What? Did you just read that headline correctly?
Yes, you did....
Barack Obama -- although the New York Times would burn down its own building rather than admit it -- did an abysmal job with Putin and was indeed the one who was truly "owned" by the Russian. And it wasn't just the silly reset button and the embarrassing video of Barack whispering into Medvedev's ear to tell Vlad he -- Barack -- would be more flexible on missiles after the election. (What a toady!) Even worse, in his Chamberlainesque ardor to make a deal with Iran's mullahs, Obama let Putin play him in Syria, agreeing not to honor his redline against Assad's use of chemical weapons in order not to endanger the deal. Trump never did anything nearly that pathetic. Actually, he stands up strong.
But the David Gergens of the world yammer on that Trump is doing everything wrong. He's certainly doing some things wrong -- we all do -- but being gracious to Putin personally while actively opposing what the Russian does in his actions, may be exactly the way to get results. But Trump's opponents don't care about results. Overwhelmed with hate, they would prefer to see the president wounded and impeached than succeed with Putin and bring about a world safer from nuclear armageddon. If Trump achieves this, however, it will be his finest hour. It would be for any president.
Wow - Politico describes our Yes on Prop 6 - Gas Tax Repeal Campaign as "unexpectedly robust" - damn right!
California Governor Jerry Brown, heading into his last months in office, is staring down a capstone political challenge — an unexpectedly robust GOP effort to dismantle one of his legacy achievements.
The gas tax, designed to pay for the state’s infrastructure repairs for the next decade, is under threat of repeal from a November ballot measure that has energized the state’s moribund Republican Party. Already, the fight has all the ingredients of a monumental political clash: implications for the control of Congress, a test of Democrats’ ability to defend the fruits of their political dominance and the four-term governor’s lasting imprint on California are all at stake....
The gas tax is a product of Democrats’ total control in Sacramento, where legislative leaders used hard-won legislative supermajorities — which allowed them to pass tax increases without Republican support...
The optics of Mueller offering immunity to the brother of Hillary Clinton's campaign manager (and a major Democrat lobbyist) so he can testify against Trump's former campaign chairman are beyond awful.
The optics of Mueller offering immunity to the brother of Hillary Clinton's campaign manager (and a major Democrat lobbyist) so he can testify against Trump's former campaign chairman are beyond awful. This is an awful look for Mueller. https://t.co/LXj6KDjKye— James Hasson (@JamesHasson20) July 20, 2018
GET YOUR TICKETS NOW FOR A SPECIAL ADVANCE SHOWING OF DINESH D'SOUZA'S 'DEATH OF A NATION' IN EUREKA
July 31, 7:00pm at Broadway Theater in Eureka
My good friend & American Patriot @DineshDSouza is releasing another film.— Educating Liberals (@Education4Libs) June 26, 2018
‘DEATH OF A NATION - Can We Save America a Second Time?’
In theaters August 3rd, 2018!!!!!
Please RT to let people know & let’s make this a box office smash! pic.twitter.com/RPRw6YEoZP
Tickets: $13.00 Includes a free DVD of a D'Souza movie.
Pick up tickets at Humboldt Republican Office, 311 Fifth St., Eureka
Get tickets from:
John Schutt (702) 561-5268 firstname.lastname@example.org
Annette De Modena (707) 499-6310 email@example.com
Judy Herman (707) 407-5341 firstname.lastname@example.org
Minnie Wolf (707) 445-3501 email@example.com
Not since 1860 have the Democrats so fanatically refused to accept the result of a free election. That year, their target was Lincoln. They smeared him. They went to war to defeat him. In the end, they assassinated him.
Now the target of the Democrats is President Trump and his supporters. The Left calls them racists, white supremacists and fascists. These charges are used to justify driving Trump from office and discrediting the right "by any means necessary."
But which is the party of the slave plantation? Which is the party that invented white supremacy? Which is the party that praised fascist dictators and shaped their genocidal policies and was in turn praised by them?
Moreover, which is the party of racism today? Is fascism now institutionally embodied on the right or on the left?
Through stunning historical recreations and a searching examination of fascism and white supremacy, Death of a Nation cuts through progressive big lies to expose hidden history and explosive truths.
Lincoln united his party and saved America from the Democrats for the first time. Can Trump—and we—come together and save America for the second time?
Thursday, July 19, 2018
What happens in voters’ backyards can affect their choices as powerfully as what is happening in D.C.
Ocasio-Cortez Should Be Lesson for the Democratic Establishment https://t.co/tteoHhu0Sl— The Weekly Standard (@weeklystandard) July 18, 2018
“Because the policies Ms. Ocasio-Cortez advocates are so far from the mainstream, her election in November would make it harder for Congress to stop fighting and start fixing problems,” Liberman wrote. “Nancy Pelosi has tried to put distance between Ms. Ocasio-Cortez and House Democrats… She knows that if Democrats are to regain a majority, it will be by winning swing districts with sensible, mainstream candidates. Ms. Ocasio-Cortez is making that task harder across America.”
'WOMP WOMP'! Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez takes ANOTHER painful punch from liberal media outlet https://t.co/GsihY3So5E— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) July 20, 2018
As more people leave the Bay Area, local moving companies are struggling to keep up. https://t.co/vylEZpkYvp— The Sacramento Bee (@sacbee_news) July 19, 2018
...From Santa Rosa to San Jose, more and more residents are making the bittersweet decision to leave the Bay Area, abandoning its near-perfect weather, booming economy and thriving arts, culture and food scenes in favor of less-glamorous destinations like Austin, Boise and Knoxville.
Some are fleeing the Bay Area's sky-high housing and rent prices, both among the most expensive in the nation. Others are cashing out, selling their homes to get more for their money in a less expensive city. Nearly all of them are fed up with miserable, hours-long commutes on snarled freeways.
More people are leaving the Bay Area than are moving in...
Tip O’Neill famously said that all politics is local. It’s no longer true. Local politics aren’t even local in the age of Trump
Must everything be about Washington and the presidency? https://t.co/6iwJsXyZJa— The Weekly Standard (@weeklystandard) July 19, 2018
...Partly this is the result of the federal government’s arrogation of state power; there just aren’t as many local issues to argue about anymore. But even more it’s the decline in the power of incumbency and the rise of the primary wars. Republican Eric Cantor, the powerful House majority leader, wasn’t upset by a Democratic opponent in 2014; he lost the GOP primary to an unknown Virginian economist, David Brat. The latter’s support came initially from national media with knives sharpened for Cantor as a GOP establishment favorite. Incumbents are under assault from both left and right and so the question of whether they “stand with the president” or are willing to “stand up to the president” is the only one.
Rather than talking to the voters themselves and figuring out the three or four things that concern them most immediately, candidates listen mainly to their consultants and decide whether their campaigns will venerate the president or denounce him. For the press, arguing about the presidency and the future of the country is more interesting than arguing about the continued funding of a military base or the local effects of a federal environmental regulation. And so every election becomes a referendum on the the man in the White House and his policies—which today means that everything becomes more about Trump than it already was.
One’s attitude toward the president is important, but it’s hardly the only relevant thing to know about a candidate for high office. There’s no reason a principled congressional candidate can’t say Trump’s right sometimes and wrong sometimes—say, disagree with him on trade policy but praise him for withdrawing from the Iran nuclear deal—and, with that out of the way, move on to discussions of greater local and regional concern. Yet we’re hard-pressed to think of any candidate doing so in 2018.
The 2018 midterms are about Trump and only Trump....
GP I'm about five pages into the complaint, and I am beyond amused that these high tax jurisdictions are arguing taxation is a harmful penalty and taxing authority ought thus be curtailed. https://t.co/KCDYNDA1tv— The Gormogons (@Gormogons) July 18, 2018
Wednesday, July 18, 2018
Putin hacking the Republican Campaign doesn't fit the narrative. So Mueller and Rosenstein censored that evidence in their latest Russian indictment, and in the recent Nunes report on Russian interference in the election— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) July 18, 2018
BREAKING: In June 2016, US intelligence--including NSA, FBI & CIA--knew that the computer networks of BOTH presidential candidates--Hillary Clinton AND Donald Trump (as well as GOP PACs)-were targeted by Russian spies. Yet now that information is being COVERED UP by DOJ & Mueller— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) July 18, 2018
BREAKING: The CrowdStrike analyst who ran the forensics on DNC servers worked for Mueller at FBI and in fact was personally promoted by Mueller— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) July 18, 2018
First the FBI & DOJ relied on a Clinton contractor (CrowdStrike) to provide research to blame Russia for hacking Clinton, then they relied on another Clinton contractor (Fusion GPS) to obtain a warrant to spy on Trump campaign to frame it for colluding w Russia. Notice a pattern?— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) July 18, 2018
The FBI & DOJ agreed to not issue warrants to the DNC or Clinton campaign to search computer devices in the Russia hacking probe, just like they agreed to not issue warrants to Clinton and her aides to search their devices in the email espionage probe.— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) July 18, 2018
Notice a pattern?
BREAKING NEWS: Mueller, Rosenstein censored evidence of Russia hacking the RNC and Trump campaign from indictment, Nunes reporthttps://t.co/WElV39RUb7— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) July 18, 2018
BREAKING: Clinton campaign counsel Marc Elias hired CrowdStrike to write the unusual public report blaming Russia for hacking the DNC in June 2016 -- the same month Elias hired Fusion GPS & Steele to write the dossier pinning the hacking on not just Russia but also Trump campaign— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) July 18, 2018
Google's Democrat boss who personally advised Hillary's campaign has pumped $100 million into CrowdStrike, which provides in-kind services for Democrats around the country— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) July 18, 2018
It's now clear from the DNC hiring a Democrat contractor with an anti-Russia agenda to do the forensics, while stiff-arming objective FBI computer analysts, that political factors crowded out a scientific examination of the evidence. Ergo, Mueller's evidence is not court worthy— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) July 18, 2018
BREAKING: The FBI (and Mueller's team) obtained only the "forensic" images of the allegedly hacked DNC systems from CrowdStrike, which is not the same as workable mirror images of the hard drives. (And again, no actual machines were examined at the FBI forensics lab at Quantico.)— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) July 18, 2018
DOJ, which is working with Mueller probe, compelled congressional committees investigating Russian election interference to redact info about Russian intrusions @ RNC & other GOP targets from their reports, claiming it is classified at the highest levels. https://t.co/WElV39RUb7— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) July 18, 2018
Q: When did the DNC provide access for the FBI for your technical folks to review what happened?— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) July 18, 2018
COMEY: Well we never got direct access to the machines themselves. The DNC hired a firm [CrowdStrike] that ultimately shared with us their forensics from their review of the system.
Q: You have still never been given access to any of the machines hacked by the Russians?— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) July 18, 2018
COMEY: That's correct, altho we got forensics from the pros they hired which--best practice is always to get access to the machines themselves--my folks tell me was an appropriate substitute
Dems now claiming Mueller/FBI didn't need direct access to DNC/DCCC servers & computers b/c he had "images" from CrowdStrike. Really?See IG report, which makes clear how critical it was for FBI to physically acquire devices & servers in Hillary email case.But not in Russia case?!— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) July 18, 2018
Recall in Oct 2016, Comey's FBI also leaked to Apuzzo @ NYT that Manafort under "FBI investigation." Wasn't just Carter Page they were leaking on, was also Manafort. And it was NYT story on Ukraine dealings that forced Manafort's exit in Aug. One of NYT's sources? Glenn Simpson— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) July 18, 2018
Mueller indictment fails to support Brennan's ICA in 2 key ways:— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) July 18, 2018
1) ICA claims both GRU & FSB behind cyberattacks, whereas Mueller only names GRU
2) ICA claims motive for Russian attack was to "help Trump win," whereas Mueller says objective was simply to interfere in election.
Without the DNC and DCCC servers -- or "the 10 DCCC computers and 33 DNC computers" the GRU allegedly gained access to--Mueller is not able to present physical evidence in court to prove a crime even occurred. Where is the underlying evidence? His indictment is a political farce— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) July 18, 2018
Never forget, John Brennan is the puppet master of #SpyGate. Christopher Steele, Stef Halper, Nellie Ohr, Peter Strzok, as well as Mueller's Russian hacking & trolling indictments, all tie back to him. He's also the one who fed "collusion" dirt to Dem minority on intel committees— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) July 14, 2018
FOR MORE, FOLLOW PAUL SPERRY ON TWITTER