Why Aren't Conservative Women Recognized During Women's History Month?

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by The Washington Times (@washtimes)

Interesting pitch from National Review: Kat Timpf . . . nails it.

It seems as though every day something new is being declared “problematic.”

For example: long, adorned nails. That’s right — in January, they were declared “cultural appropriation.” That same month, an academic article by an Australian professor claimed that small chairs in pre-schools are “problematic” because they’re “disempowering” for teachers, and also kind of sexist. In March, “God Bless you” was deemed an anti-Muslim micro-aggression. In February, a writing guide at Purdue University advised against using words with “man” in them.

In terms of campus insanity, Purdue is far from the only offender. In fact, it seems as though things on our college campuses have gotten completely out of hand. In the fall, Kings College in London actually employed “safe space marshals” to police speeches for offensive content. In December, a group of student protesters at Western Washington University declared that defending the First Amendment was “violent.” Earlier this year, the University of Connecticut offered counseling to students who might be upset at “even the thought of” a Ben Shapiro speech. Earlier this month, Penn State forbade its Outing Club from going outside on the grounds that it was just too dangerous.

This is sad stuff — and there’s far too much of it for me to list here — but the truth is, the only way that people can fight it is by first knowing what’s going on. That’s why I try to use my National Review column to keep people updated on the latest political-correctness insanity and college-campus craziness. If people who disagree with the latest cultural trends want to see them change, then they have to start by being informed about what’s happening.

If you want people to continue to be able to stay informed about these issues, consider donating to National Review’s Spring Webathon. That way, I can keep writing about cultural craziness — and you can keep your nails as long and bedazzled as you want.

Many thanks,
Katherine Timpf

Lack of Female Ponytails in #AvengersInfinityWar Declared ‘Sexist’ https://t.co/1yfaTY0qTe via @KatTimpf pic.twitter.com/FiN5BP3jcm

— National Review (@NRO) May 2, 2018

Student Op-Ed: Conservatives Can Never Be ‘a Minority,’ Because of White Privilege https://t.co/MPqe8u7EoH via @KatTimpf pic.twitter.com/Oyp7QywQgV

— National Review (@NRO) May 1, 2018

Penn State Forbids Outing Club from Going Outside Because It’s Too Dangerous https://t.co/kE0OL0VPbt via @KatTimpf pic.twitter.com/YFBNEyeTAA

— National Review (@NRO) April 25, 2018

My latest @NRO: "Oxford Cancels Weed-Themed Party amid ‘Cultural Appropriation’ Concerns https://t.co/KffOi7eJ89"

— Kat Timpf (@KatTimpf) April 18, 2018

"The truth is, there are a lot of things out there that can kill you, but engaging with an opposing viewpoint isn’t one of them. In fact, it’s healthy." --@KatTimpf https://t.co/auKRS1p8SO

— Drew Watkins (@AndrewDWatkins) April 4, 2018

The DC’s Stephanie Hamill Exposes Facebook’s Devious Plan To ‘Steal The 2018 Election’ For The Democrats

During one of the hearings, #Zuckerberg said combating election interference was one of his top priorities this year and that he has more confidence that #Facebook’s going to “get this right this year.”
So what exactly does Mark Zuckerberg mean by right? https://t.co/1LGAprcmii

— Anna Bacon (@AnnaBD20) April 14, 2018

Members of Congress grilled CEO Mark Zuckerberg this week over the company’s data privacy issues and also for the network’s alleged bias against conservatives.

During one of the hearings, Zuckerberg said combating election interference was one of his top priorities this year and that he has more confidence that Facebook’s going to “get this right this year.”

So what exactly does Mark Zuckerberg mean by right? He means the public was wrong when it chose Trump in 2016, that Trump supporters should be punished, and that Zuckerberg will do everything in his power to prevent politically incorrect election choices from happening again. That’s what he means....

We too seldom recognize the value of the freedom to hate. Like, I hate Canadians. Do they suffer harm from my hatred of them? No, but I enjoy it. https://t.co/X4h7zglRO9

— The Patriarch Tree (@PatriarchTree) April 15, 2018

‘Unsafe to the community’: Facebook censors pro-Trump Diamond and Silk

.@DiamondandSilk have been corresponding since September 7, 2017, with @facebook (owned by Mark Zuckerberg), about their bias censorship and discrimination against D&S brand page. Finally after several emails, chats, phone calls, appeals, beating around the bush, lies, and......

— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018

....... giving us the run around, Facebook gave us another bogus reason why Millions of people who have liked and/or followed our page no longer receives notification and why our page, post and video reach was reduced by a very large percentage. Here is the reply from..........

— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018

...Facebook said: "This decision is final and it is not appeal-able in any way." (Note: This is the exact wording that FB emailed to us.)

So our questions to Facebook (Mark Zuckerberg) are:
1. What is unsafe about two Blk-women supporting the @POTUS @realDonaldTrump?
2.....

— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018

.....Our FB page has been created since December 2014, when exactly did the content and the brand become unsafe to the community?
3. When you say "community" are you referring to the Millions who liked and followed our page?
4. What content on our page was in violation?
5....

— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018

.....If our content and brand was so unsafe to the community, why is the option for us to boost our content and spend money with FB to enhance our brand page still available? Maybe FB should give us a refund since FB censored our reach.
6.....

— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018

.....Lastly, didn't FB violate their own policy when FB stopped sending notifications to the Millions of people who liked and followed our brand page?

This is deliberate bias censorship and discrimination. These tactics are unacceptable and we want answers!

~Diamond and Silk pic.twitter.com/wQqtub8Ges

— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018

Hello, there is your unroll: https://t.co/Ml6NIAqyxF
Talk to you soon. 🤖

— Thread Reader Bot (@threadreaderapp) April 7, 2018

"provocative"
"controversial"

All words used to malign people. Terms used by elites used, scientifically, to block most people from critically making their own decision on if the source's contents is legitimate or illegitimate.

— Ali Alexander 👑 (@ali) April 8, 2018

‘Unsafe to the community’: Facebook takes on pro-Trump Diamond and Silk https://t.co/703MoeSTV6 via @american_mirror

— Joel B. Pollak (@joelpollak) April 8, 2018

.@DiamondandSilk FURIOUS After Facebook Reveals Why Their Content Has Been Censored https://t.co/DtwJ6a0bB9

— Jim Hoft (@gatewaypundit) April 8, 2018

....... giving us the run around, Facebook gave us another bogus reason why Millions of people who have liked and/or followed our page no longer receives notification and why our page, post and video reach was reduced by a very large percentage. Here is the reply from..........

— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018

...Facebook said: "This decision is final and it is not appeal-able in any way." (Note: This is the exact wording that FB emailed to us.)

So our questions to Facebook (Mark Zuckerberg) are:
1. What is unsafe about two Blk-women supporting the @POTUS @realDonaldTrump?
2.....

— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018

.....Our FB page has been created since December 2014, when exactly did the content and the brand become unsafe to the community?
3. When you say "community" are you referring to the Millions who liked and followed our page?
4. What content on our page was in violation?
5....

— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018

.....If our content and brand was so unsafe to the community, why is the option for us to boost our content and spend money with FB to enhance our brand page still available? Maybe FB should give us a refund since FB censored our reach.
6.....

— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018

.....Lastly, didn't FB violate their own policy when FB stopped sending notifications to the Millions of people who liked and followed our brand page?

This is deliberate bias censorship and discrimination. These tactics are unacceptable and we want answers!

~Diamond and Silk pic.twitter.com/wQqtub8Ges

— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018

Hello, there is your unroll: https://t.co/Ml6NIAqyxF
Talk to you soon. 🤖

— Thread Reader Bot (@threadreaderapp) April 7, 2018

"provocative"
"controversial"

All words used to malign people. Terms used by elites used, scientifically, to block most people from critically making their own decision on if the source's contents is legitimate or illegitimate.

— Ali Alexander 👑 (@ali) April 8, 2018

Conservatives Would Be Crazy to Sit Out the Midterms

Republicans haven't been doing a good job, but can we afford the Democratic Party? https://t.co/RYCyZiqfGB

— American Spectator (@amspectator) April 6, 2018

What was in the budget bill that made conservatives so upset?

Trump called it a "ridiculous situation," but what was in the budget bill that made conservatives so upset? https://t.co/OABhQTfRw1 pic.twitter.com/cNWkEO2nVi

— POLITICO (@politico) March 26, 2018

Among regular FACEBOOK users, 48% still believe their personal data on the site is secure

faceplant #FacebookDataBreach #DrainTheSwamp #DemocratLiesMatter Always #VoteGOP #NoRINOs #MAGA #DemocratsBeingDemocrats pic.twitter.com/wqFHcTPIyX

— Robert Ariail (@RobertAriail) March 23, 2018

Facebook Changes Are Starving Conservative Media https://t.co/kYRJ2svUdk

— Legal Insurrection (@LegInsurrection) March 23, 2018

Among regular @facebook users, 48% still believe their personal data on the site is secure. Just as many (47%) disagree. But 51% say they are likely to quit #Facebook all together because of #privacy concerns. https://t.co/yj4ID7aW37 #FacebookDataBreach #CambridgeAnalytics pic.twitter.com/aXPUWsIWZ5

— Rasmussen Reports (@Rasmussen_Poll) March 23, 2018

Elon Musk deletes SpaceX, Tesla Facebook pages https://t.co/Hz34Fsop5g pic.twitter.com/OuxOwOBRBK

— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) March 23, 2018

Amazon Deletes Reviews of Conservative Authors with No Explanation

Amazon Deletes Reviews of Conservative Authors with No Explanation https://t.co/uGhm6ddT2g #Trending via @pjmedia_com

— John Hawkins (@johnhawkinsrwn) March 18, 2018

The Censorship Of Conservatives On The Internet Is Approaching Critical Levels

The Censorship of Conservatives on the Internet Is Approaching Critical Levels of Bad https://t.co/Sd4F1stjJI

— Cam Edwards (@CamEdwards) March 16, 2018

7 Techniques Liberals Use to Silence Conservatives https://t.co/j23ZMZ5wXu

— John Hawkins (@johnhawkinsrwn) March 16, 2018

Always interested in the differences in how lefty billionaire Tom Steyer is treated by our friends in the media as opposed to righty billionaires Charles and David Koch.

Always interested in the differences in how lefty billionaire Tom Steyer is treated by our friends in the media as opposed to righty billionaires Charles and David Koch.

Some tough questions? Same built in skepticism? Same worrying about “money in politics?” https://t.co/Yr5KbF6MXI

— Ron Nehring (@RonNehring) March 12, 2018

Lol => CNN Ditches 'Trump Jobs Tracker' After Economy Booms https://t.co/y1hkocNze9 pic.twitter.com/UqW7CElX6s

— Steven Crowder (@scrowder) March 12, 2018

2018 ideology primer:

2018 ideology primer:

Progressivism: “We want to take what you earned and give it to those who feel entitled to it, don’t deserve it, and shouldn’t have it.”

Conservatism: “No”

— John Cardillo (@johncardillo) January 1, 2018

Glamour 'Women of the Year' Snubs Conservative Women

.@glamourmag Women of the Year Snubs Conservative Women https://t.co/DBlESDg6ad

— Fox News (@FoxNews) November 18, 2017

Lauren Debellis Appell: "When I point to female role models... I point to people like the @SarahHuckabee and @KellyannePolls of the world. I don't point to the organizers of the women's march." pic.twitter.com/JNJKYfRslD

— Fox News (@FoxNews) November 18, 2017

Do Conservatives And Liberals Have Enough in Common to Keep A Country Together Anymore?

Do Conservatives And Liberals Have Enough in Common to Keep A Country Together Anymore? https://t.co/uw7PHMUzie

— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) November 18, 2017

Cosmopolitan, Elle, and the Attack Against Conservative Women

Cosmopolitan, Elle, and the Attack Against Conservative Women https://t.co/nCVjYsCK14 pic.twitter.com/0MgkXfVwHO

— The Daily Signal (@DailySignal) July 3, 2017

‘So much for diversity’! Notice anyone missing from Cosmo’s list of potential woman presidents? Not a single Republican woman. Not surprised though.

Not a single Republican woman. Not surprised though.

— Olympia Bardis (@olympiabardis) June 27, 2017

And those seven women are — drumroll, please — Kirsten Gillibrand, Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren, Amy Klobuchar, Tammy Duckworth, Sheryl Sandberg, and Oprah. Because of course Oprah.

But we can’t seem to shake this feeling that there are still some women missing from that list. Wonder why that is.

Oh...

Of course it's only liberal women 🙄

— Brad Lang (@BradLangShow) June 27, 2017

No GOP women? Cosmo is more pro Democrats than it is pro Women.

— Nicholas Virzi (@nicholasvirzi) June 27, 2017

Wow not one republican woman. Seems to me like you want to limit the voice & accomplishments of an entire political side.

— Unclerico23 (@UncleRico23) June 27, 2017

btw, it really does bother me that so many "pro-women" groups only consider liberals to be acceptable women
It's a truly damaging attitude

— PoliMath (@politicalmath) June 27, 2017

Where is Nikki Haley on this list?

Oh… it only counts if they’re democrats. https://t.co/SxuEyuandY

— Josh Perry 🇺🇸 (@MrJoshPerry) June 27, 2017

Nikki Haley.
Mia Love.
Condoleezza Rice.
Carly Fiorina.
Joni Ernst.
Elise Stefanik.
Susana Martinez & more.
Yes, Cosmo, GOP women exist. https://t.co/WLgXV5dzNv

— FutureFemaleLeaders (@FFL_of_America) June 27, 2017

Cosmo thinks there are no women in the GOP who could be President. Sounds like they are part of the very Patriarchy they criticize. Sad! https://t.co/nlgWQla603

— Meech (@michi83) June 27, 2017

While you were focused on COMEY, Trump nominated another group of CONSERVATIVE Judges

Just spoke on CNN pointing out GOP agenda is moving forward: 14 CRA repeals of Obama regulations, FCC, FDA chairmen, SCOTUS pick, taxes next

— Grover Norquist (@GroverNorquist) June 10, 2017

While you were focused on COMEY, Trump nominated another group of CONSERVATIVE Judges https://t.co/uT1Rx7Ax9s pic.twitter.com/LarHeXiNht

— Legal Insurrection (@LegInsurrection) June 8, 2017

As one radical famously put it in the 1960s, “The issue is never the issue. The issue is the revolution!” And the meaning of “revolution” is simple: “We get more power. You get less.”

Sean Hannity and the Revolution https://t.co/KnWcGC5sjf

— Matthew Vadum (@vadum) June 3, 2017

They hate you. Just ask them. | Liberals Are Shocked To Find We’re Starting To Hate Them Right Back

They hate you. Just ask them. | Liberals Are Shocked To Find We’re Starting To Hate Them Right Back https://t.co/GvpxSEwzI2

— Kurt Schlichter (@KurtSchlichter) May 29, 2017

...We don’t like the new rules – I’d sure prefer a society where no one was getting attacked, having walked through the ruins of a country that took that path – but we normals didn’t choose the new rules. The left did. It gave us Ferguson, Middlebury College, Berkeley, and “Punch a Nazi” – which, conveniently for the left, translates as “punch normals.” And many of us have had personal experiences with this New Hate – jobs lost, hassles, and worse. Some scumbags at an anti-Trump rally attacked my friend and horribly injured his dog. His freaking dog.

So when we start to adopt their rules, they’re shocked? Have they ever met human beings before? It’s not a surprise. It’s inevitable....

Liberals think they are tolerant, but often, they arent

BREAKING: "American universities these days seem committed to every kind of diversity except intellectual diversity."https://t.co/3N3JhlIp31

— Adam Baldwin (@AdamBaldwin) May 28, 2017

"Liberals think they are tolerant, but often, they aren't," argues @FareedZakaria https://t.co/0urfK127Z3

— CNN (@CNN) May 28, 2017

@thehill Nearly 100 8th graders manipulated for political purposes by adults who have planted propaganda into their brains.

— Jim Crackton (@JimCrackton) May 28, 2017

@thehill Nearly 100 8th graders manipulated for political purposes by adults who have planted propaganda into their brains.

— Jim Crackton (@JimCrackton) May 28, 2017

Meeting the Speaker of the House, regardless of party, is a tremendous honor. This reflects poorly on their parents. https://t.co/SIp8udH45r

— John Noonan (@noonanjo) May 28, 2017

Why Would 8th Graders Diss Paul Ryan? https://t.co/eRBO6RaEwY #trending pic.twitter.com/tsRpxryR9d

— #PJMedia (@PJMedia_com) May 30, 2017

parents raising Snowflakes. Teaching such intolerance is scary. https://t.co/xaoU89N27w

— Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) May 28, 2017

@thehill So what are we teaching kids? Don't engage in discussion with opposing views? Maybe if they did that they would find common ground.

— Luke Oakman (@loakman) May 28, 2017

@michellemalkin Montana, Hell, Let’s Talk of the Democrat’s LONG History of Political Violencehttps://t.co/ZSepg3qeSx

— Warner Todd Huston (@warnerthuston) May 28, 2017

@wikileaks exposes GOOGLE helped terrorists in SYRIA while CENSORING CONSERVATIVES in USA

@wikileaks exposes GOOGLE helped terrorists in SYRIA while CENSORING CONSERVATIVES in USA https://t.co/hugi7qJUgV ANTI-TRUST GOOGLE

— Jerome Corsi (@jerome_corsi) May 16, 2017