FACEBOOK, AMAZON, GOOGLE AND TWITTER ALL WORK WITH LEFT-WING HATE-GROUP

Amazon is the worst of tech companies empowering SPLC, report says. @Amazon give SPLC “broad policing power over the Amazon Smile charitable program, while claiming to remain unbiased.”

“We remove organizations that the SPLC deems as ineligible.” https://t.co/uckjpP5p6v

— J Michael Waller (@JMichaelWaller) June 7, 2018

...Amazon grants the SPLC that power “because we don’t want to be biased whatsoever,” said the spokeswoman, who could not say whether Amazon considers the SPLC to be unbiased.

The Smile program allows customers to identify a charity to receive 0.5 percent of the proceeds from their purchases on Amazon. Customers have given more than $8 million to charities through the program since 2013, according to Amazon.

Only one participant in the program, the SPLC, gets to determine which other groups are allowed to join it.

Christian legal groups like the Alliance Defending Freedom — which recently successfully represented a Christian baker at the Supreme Court — are barred from the Amazon Smile program, while openly anti-Semitic groups remain, TheDCNF found in May.

One month later, the anti-Semitic groups — but not the Alliance Defending Freedom — are still able to participate in the program....

When the SPLC decided to attack @PragerU, the leftist group "couldn't really come up with any evidence about how dangerous we are, but concluded that we're dangerous. The truth doesn't matter to them." https://t.co/D3Ye3oAITx @PJMedia_com #Trending

— Tyler O'Neil (@Tyler2ONeil) June 8, 2018

Pulse nightclub shooting survivors sue Google, Facebook, Twitter over ‘material support’ to ISIS

Pulse nightclub shooting survivors sue Google, Facebook, Twitter over ‘material support’ to ISIS https://t.co/RxOGz8bV9r

— FOX & friends (@foxandfriends) April 6, 2018

...In a lawsuit filed Wednesday in Orlando’s federal courthouse, 16 victims of the June 12, 2016 shooting -- the second deadliest in American history -- claim that the three tech giants were responsible for letting ISIS disseminate propaganda on their platforms, thus providing “material support” to the terror group, in violation of the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA).

Such support, the suit alleges, let gunman Omar Mateen carry out his attack, which left 49 people dead and another 58 injured, the Orlando Sentinel reported. Mateen was killed in a shootout with responding police officers....

How to download your data from Google, Twitter, LinkedIn, Snapchat

faceplant! @Ramireztoons #NoIntegrity #FacebookDataBreach #DrainTheSwamp #DemocratLiesMatter Always #VoteGOP #NoRINOs #MAGA #DemocratsBeingDemocrats pic.twitter.com/aqTuyxtJfU

— Political Cartoons (@PolToons) March 27, 2018

Facebook isn't the only social network that lets you download your data. https://t.co/hdZVQAIiRJ So do Google, Twitter, LinkedIn, Snapchat.

But a big one is missing.

— Dwight Silverman (@dsilverman) March 29, 2018

Facebook's Cambridge Analytica scandal has raised awareness of the data it gathers on its users, and what's done with it.

Of course, Facebook is not alone. All social networks that turn their users' activity into money retain lots of information - some of it posted by those users, others generated by behavior.

And many give you the opportunity to download and view it. As I wrote last week, Facebook has a data-download feature. So do many of the major online services, including Google, Twitter, LinkedIn and Snapchat.

Want to see what these networks have on you? Here's a guide to downloading your data from them.

https://t.co/YCbCXDZtp2 via @politico

— Bo Snerdley (@BoSnerdley) March 29, 2018

Extent of information held by Google is shocking!!!

— Freedom Vine: Free Speech Social Media Platform (@freedom_vine) March 29, 2018

Social media is aiding the decline of free speech

Social media is aiding the decline of free speech https://t.co/vwtLlMylD9 via @RedAlert pic.twitter.com/vfrgupu97V

— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) March 19, 2018

Amazon Deletes Reviews of Conservative Authors with No Explanation

Amazon Deletes Reviews of Conservative Authors with No Explanation https://t.co/uGhm6ddT2g #Trending via @pjmedia_com

— John Hawkins (@johnhawkinsrwn) March 18, 2018

The Censorship Of Conservatives On The Internet Is Approaching Critical Levels

The Censorship of Conservatives on the Internet Is Approaching Critical Levels of Bad https://t.co/Sd4F1stjJI

— Cam Edwards (@CamEdwards) March 16, 2018

7 Techniques Liberals Use to Silence Conservatives https://t.co/j23ZMZ5wXu

— John Hawkins (@johnhawkinsrwn) March 16, 2018

Google managers kept blacklists of conservative employees — and one manager even considered holding 'trials', alleges a new lawsuit

#Google is disgusting. Absolutely appalling. I hope this lawyer destroys them. https://t.co/1RYlinnkX7

— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) January 10, 2018

Employees at Google who express "conservative viewpoints in politically-charged debates" may find themselves blacklisted by managers at the company, alleges an explosive new lawsuit.

And by blacklisted, that means their names may appear on actual lists, the suit contends.

Google employees who identify as conservative say they have complained to HR and senior management about the blacklists.

These allegations are part of a lawsuit filed on behalf of fired Google engineer James Damore that seeks to represent white males and conservatives who feel like they've been the target of discrimination.

"Please follow protocols based on the prescribed actions for this type of guest"

The Federal Government is no longer the main threat to your privacy and freedoms. Big corporations are. The Orwellian future is increasingly the Orwellian present, and tech barons are becoming our new commissars. #Tucker @FoxNews

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) January 10, 2018

Banks have silent alarms when they're being robbed. Google has silent alarms when a conservative visits their campus. pic.twitter.com/yQRO5JbkF8

— Roosh (@rooshv) January 8, 2018

On August 26, 2016, Curtis Yarvin, a well-known conservative blogger who has reportedly advised Steve bannon, Peter Thierl, and other members of the Trump administration, visited the Google office to have lunch with an employee. This triggered a silent alarm, alerting security personnel to escort him off the premises.

Google’s New ‘Fact-Check Feature’ Targets Conservative Sites https://t.co/UvYwqrHtUX pic.twitter.com/iopl4r5wYB

— Pamela Geller (@PamelaGeller) January 9, 2018

Google, the most powerful search engine in the world, is now displaying fact checks for conservative publications in its results.

No prominent liberal site receives the same treatment. https://t.co/UwYd5f6f1I

— The Daily Signal (@DailySignal) January 9, 2018

"And not only is Google’s fact-checking highly partisan — perhaps reflecting the sentiments of its leaders — it is also blatantly wrong, asserting sites made 'claims' they demonstrably never made." https://t.co/t2MEVJ5c1W

— Heritage Foundation (@Heritage) January 9, 2018

I wish @Cernovich was wrong, but pretty sure most Googlers and leftists would lock us up (or worse) if they had absolute authority in this country.#Googlelawsuit pic.twitter.com/sw6SCUNkrr

— BIG PODESTA (@bigpodesta) January 9, 2018

The growth in online censorship by tech titans Facebook, Twitter, and Google's search and YouTube platform is one of the most under-reported stories of the past two years.

Twitter Begins Using 'Blue Check' Status As a 'Big Brother' Weapon https://t.co/CnX2grnb1z

— NewsBusters (@newsbusters) November 20, 2017

...In the latest disturbing development, Twitter, which has been increasingly heavy-handed in censoring center-right content, content providers, and everyday users since last year's general election campaign, has announced that it will unilaterally remove "blue-check" (i.e., "verified") status from groups and users who in its view have violated its Terms of Service — even for offline behavior it considers unacceptable....

Until now, even with the Milo dustup, there hasn't been a person on earth who believed that Twitter's blue check mark was anything more than a form of identity verification. Twitter, for no good reason and entirely on its own, has chosen to make "blue check" status a "badge of approval," and has appointed itself the sole arbiter of who is "approved" and who isn't.

That's an open invitation to a tidal wave of political pressure, false tattle-taling, and free speech marginalization. Expect SJWs to harass Twitter and its CEO Jack Dorsey relentlessly over anyone and everyone it doesn't like who has blue-check status — up to and including President Donald Trump. In fact, the campaign against Trump's blue check has already begun.

Rebels of Google: ‘Senior Leaders Focus on Diversity First and Technology Second’

The Google Memo: Four Scientists Respond (new link) https://t.co/LR3vQHuh0M

— Quillette Magazine (@QuilletteM) August 8, 2017

- @BreitbartNews is now exclusively publishing a series of interviews with Google employees https://t.co/9eMczrcaKr

— Charlie Spiering (@charliespiering) August 8, 2017

Google is more afraid of liberal outrage than federal law https://t.co/CkZdw2EWsL by @PhilipWegmann pic.twitter.com/M2cid8Nmw8

— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 8, 2017

Google Values Diversity (Just Not of Thought)

If you haven't read the memo about Orwellian diversity at Google - clearly few journalists have - you can see it at https://t.co/efo8iIbLWW

— Ezra Levant 🇨🇦 (@ezralevant) August 8, 2017

On August 7, 2017, a Google employee wrote an internal memo titled Google’s Ideological Echo Chamber that quickly circulated throughout the company. Soon after, journalists got ahold of the contents of the document, and controversy broke out. (In the link above) is the original memo reproduced as verbatim as possible.

JUST IN: Google has fired an employee who wrote a memo blasting the web company’s diversity policies https://t.co/5gm8BTOdID pic.twitter.com/OnxRAMddN6

— Bloomberg (@business) August 8, 2017

There's no room for free speech at Google. pic.twitter.com/ERP60zPwe5

— Mike Cernovich 🇺🇸 (@Cernovich) August 8, 2017

Employee whose memo criticized Google as an ‘ideological echo chamber’ reportedly fired https://t.co/fDhS8a5K9J

— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) August 8, 2017

Google fires employee behind controversial memo on diversity, reports say https://t.co/PiURXTOCa6

— Fox News (@FoxNews) August 8, 2017

- Google employee called for intellectual diversity

- Within 24 hrs he was doxxed, fired, and, blacklisted

- Welcome to the future

— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) August 8, 2017

That James Damore was fired is lunacy. That it was Google that fired him makes this truly alarming. #SearchNoMore https://t.co/dosyeeekTV

— Bret Weinstein (@BretWeinstein) August 8, 2017

This is the conclusion of the so-called "anti-diversity" memo that got James Damore fired from Google. pic.twitter.com/AWUIneJCYX

— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) August 8, 2017

Oh my gosh, he's actually been fired! Google Fires Viewpoint Diversity Manifesto Author James Damore https://t.co/Ptmpkuj6X9

— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) August 8, 2017

Google Memo guy's life in civilized society is over. One memo and that's it. This is who we are as a society. Appalling.

— Mike Cernovich 🇺🇸 (@Cernovich) August 8, 2017

Google Values Diversity (Just Not of Thought) https://t.co/eTZc3rXsAU

— RedState (@RedState) August 8, 2017

Rebels of Google: ‘Senior Leaders Focus on Diversity First and Technology Second’ https://t.co/oCwLrtNzgq

— Stefan Molyneux (@StefanMolyneux) August 8, 2017

Here's a picture of Google's censorship team. It explains so much.#GoogleManifesto pic.twitter.com/6fKgd42YIn

— /pol/ News Forever (@polNewsForever) August 8, 2017

He was commiting violence. People felt afraid. People had to take days off. People feared for their safety.

— Alex Hidalgo (@SometimesAlex) August 8, 2017

Now this is as frightening as it is ridiculous. It's also the seed stuff of totalitarianism https://t.co/17QQMwjcMD

— DanRiehl (@DanRiehl) August 8, 2017

The Google firing is a stark reminder: Silicon Valley doesn't breed tolerance & inclusivity, but division & anger. https://t.co/p50POXpFWN

— John D Davidson (@johnddavidson) August 8, 2017

The same ppl arguing that Kaepernick should have a job because of his beliefs are arguing a Google employee shouldn't because of his.

— Sean Ramirez (@seanywap) August 8, 2017

"Not OK!", the corporate behemoth shrieks into the maw, while cutting deals with countries where human rights do not exist. https://t.co/D2s5pFGKeA

— Ben Domenech (@bdomenech) August 8, 2017

War Is Peace
Freedom Is Slavery
Groupthink Is Diversity

— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) August 8, 2017

War on Comments: Google Built an A.I. to Censor the Web, And the Media Is Celebrating

War on Comments: Google Built an A.I. to Censor the Web, And the Media Is Celebrating - Breitbart https://t.co/qEuVbevlNj

— DanRiehl (@DanRiehl) August 8, 2017

“What if technology could help improve conversations online?”

That’s the lowkey Orwellian message that greets visitors to the website of Perspective, Google’s new AI system for detecting (and potentially deleting, hiding, or burying) “toxic” comments on the web.

Perspective is still in early days of development, but in the future, you may have to adjust your speech in order to satisfy the lofty standards of Google. Otherwise, the company’s faceless AI might just have to “improve” you. Where’s Sarah Connor when you need her?

The good news is that, for now at least, Perspective is about as effective as C-3PO with a lisp. Software engineer and columnist David Auerbach has found the program woefully inept at sorting “toxic” comments from ordinary ones. Because the AI currently focuses on words rather than meanings, inoffensive comments like, “Rape is a horrible crime,” or, “few Muslims are a terrorist threat,” were assigned “toxicity” ratings of over 75 percent....

And they say that one of the company's founding values is "freedom of expression." What a joke. https://t.co/2UWUdQk4zl

— David French (@DavidAFrench) August 8, 2017

@wikileaks exposes GOOGLE helped terrorists in SYRIA while CENSORING CONSERVATIVES in USA

@wikileaks exposes GOOGLE helped terrorists in SYRIA while CENSORING CONSERVATIVES in USA https://t.co/hugi7qJUgV ANTI-TRUST GOOGLE

— Jerome Corsi (@jerome_corsi) May 16, 2017

Update on CIA #Vault7 "zero day" software vulnerabilities

Update on CIA #Vault7 "zero day" software vulnerabilities

Ref: https://t.co/h5wzfrReyy pic.twitter.com/WEiyptlRu3

— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) March 18, 2017

Oracle Funds Anti-Google Effort that Outs Hillary, Obama

ORACLE funding Anti-GOOGLE 'Transparency Group'... https://t.co/6VbaLR3UPA

— DRUDGE REPORT (@DRUDGE_REPORT) August 22, 2016

Exposing crony relationships with Obama Admin... https://t.co/rN7Hzi7VyK

— DRUDGE REPORT (@DRUDGE_REPORT) August 22, 2016

The Oracle Corporation is using its deep financial resources to fund the “Google Transparency Project,” which has set up headquarters in Washington, D.C. with a mission to “out” Google’s dicey lobbying practices and expose crony relationships with President Obama and Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.

With Google demonstrating its political clout by essentially writing the “Net Neutrality” regulatory language, Oracle and others are stepping up funding for a Silicon Valley attack dog to level the playing field.

Silicon Valley has earned the nickname “Valley of the Democrats” from the TechCrunch blog because of its symbiotic business relationship with Washington. But as Breitbart News reported last year, Google’s $16,830,000 in lobbying expenditure dominated the $139.5 million spent by both the computer and Internet industries.

Liberal groups call on Google, Microsoft to pull out of GOP convention

Liberal groups call on Google, Microsoft to pull out of GOP convention https://t.co/8JSgMgTVzX

— POLITICO (@politico) April 19, 2016

Google criticizes Calif. proposal to require driver behind wheel of driverless cars

Google criticizes Calif. proposal to require driver behind wheel of driverless cars: https://t.co/b4uionjWon pic.twitter.com/i65I8cU0Vr

— The Hill (@thehill) December 18, 2015

Wondering if it’s legal to get tanked at a bar and take your self-driving car home.

— John Ekdahl (@JohnEkdahl) December 18, 2015

FCC rules in favor of snooping by #tech giants

FCC rules in favor of snooping by #tech giants https://t.co/ctEeUSwvbj pic.twitter.com/E7JJcLSVxN

— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) November 11, 2015

“The Internet is the greatest empowerment of citizens…in many years,”

◼ Google Chairman Eric Schmidt: "The Internet Will Disappear" - Hollywood Reporter

...At the end of a panel at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland where his comments were webcast, he was asked for his prediction on the future of the Web. “I will answer very simply that the Internet will disappear,” Schmidt said.

“There will be so many IP addresses…so many devices, sensors, things that you are wearing, things that you are interacting with that you won’t even sense it,” he explained. “It will be part of your presence all the time. Imagine you walk into a room, and the room is dynamic. And with your permission and all of that, you are interacting with the things going on in the room.”

...“You now see so many strong tech platforms coming, and you are seeing a reordering and a future reordering of dominance or leaders or whatever term you want to use because of the rise of the apps on the smartphone,” Schmidt said Thursday. “All bets are off at this point as to what the smartphone app infrastructure is going to look like” as a “whole new set” of players emerges to power smartphones, which are nothing but super-computers, the Google chairman argued. “I view that as a completely open market at this point.”

Leaked Emails Reveal MPAA Plans To Pay Elected Officials To Attack Google

◼ Not surprisingly, Google has been a popular target for some state AGs. - Tech Dirt

...In the past, we've written about state Attorneys General from Nebraska and Oklahoma blaming Google for videos made by users, and about Texas' Attorney General going after Google for supposed antitrust violations (based on the same claims that the FTC later dropped entirely). But the state Attorney General with the biggest chip on his shoulder for Google has absolutely been Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood, who seemed to think that it was Google's fault that he could find counterfeit goods via search. A few months later, he was back blaming Google for infringement online as well.

This was no accident. What's come out of the Sony Pictures Leak is not just that the MPAA was buddying up to state Attorneys General, but that the MPAA was funding some of this activity and actively supporting the investigation. The leaked emails reveal that rather than seeing that NY Times article about corporate/AG corruption as a warning sign, the MPAA viewed it as a playbook. But not for preventing investigations but for encouraging and funding them. This appears to go way beyond that NY Times article. This isn't campaign donations or inviting AGs to speak at lavish events and paying for the travel. This is flat out paying AGs to investigate Google (even on issues unrelated to copyright infringement) and then promising to get extra press attention to those articles....

◼ Leaked Sony Emails Reveal Project Goliath: Grand Plan of Hollywood Studios, MPAA Against Google - Tech Times

Dozens of emails divulge how lawyers from the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) and six major studios refer to "Goliath" as their top most adversary in their common goal to stop online piracy. They talked about the problems that were created by Goliath and how Goliath would react if the group pursues the attack

In case you missed it: DRUDGE - SONY Headlines:
HOLLYWOOD HORROR: HACKERS PROMISE 'CHRISTMAS GIFT'...
Chilling Longterm Effect...
CLAIM: AMERICAN HUSTLE director groped transgender niece...
EMAILS: DICAPRIO 'DESPICABLE'...
Clooney 'loses sleep' over critics...
Studio Hires David Boies to Threaten Media...
Demands News Organizations Delete 'Stolen' Data...
REPORT: SONY Unable to Process Payments...
Hackers Flash Disturbing NEW WARNING on Staffers' Computers...
NYT Maureen Dowd Promised To Show Column Before Publication...
Jennifer Lawrence Paid Less Than Male Co-Stars...
'SELMA' DIRECTOR CALLS EMAILS 'SICKENING'...
PASCAL FIGHTS FOR JOB...
PAPER: SONY SUSPENDS FILMING
SONY SECRETS KEEP SPILLING...
HOLLYWOOD GRIPPED...
EMAILS MOCK OBAMA, BLACK MOVIES...
DRAMA: ANGRY PRODUCER CALLS JOLIE 'SPOILED BRAT' IN LEAKED SONY EMAILS...
SONY BLACKMAILED BY HACKER: PULL MOVIE OR ELSE!
FBI to Brief SONY Employees on Cybersecurity...
Employees in Email...
'Your Family Will Be in Danger'...
MORE LEAK: Top-Secret Profitability of Movies...
SONY Breach Reveals More Data Than Previously Believed...
'North Korea leaks Stallone's social security number'...
SONY Hack: Actors Salaries Leaked...
SONY HACK CLUES POINT TO INSIDE JOB...
HACKED DOCUMENTS REVEAL SONY STUDIO'S STUNNING GENDER AND RACE GAP...