Tuesday, March 16, 2021
Tuesday, June 26, 2018
NSA SPYSCRAPERS ACROSS USA REVEALED
NSA SPYSCRAPERS ACROSS USA REVEALED https://t.co/FOT6Jnf4ce
— DRUDGE REPORT (@DRUDGE_REPORT) June 26, 2018
...Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Los Angeles, New York City, San Francisco, Seattle, and Washington, D.C. In each of these cities, The Intercept has identified an AT&T facility containing networking equipment that transports large quantities of internet traffic across the United States and the world. A body of evidence – including classified NSA documents, public records, and interviews with several former AT&T employees – indicates that the buildings are central to an NSA spying initiative that has for years monitored billions of emails, phone calls, and online chats passing across U.S. territory.
The NSA considers AT&T to be one of its most trusted partners and has lauded the company’s “extreme willingness to help.” It is a collaboration that dates back decades. Little known, however, is that its scope is not restricted to AT&T’s customers. According to the NSA’s documents, it values AT&T not only because it “has access to information that transits the nation,” but also because it maintains unique relationships with other phone and internet providers. The NSA exploits these relationships for surveillance purposes, commandeering AT&T’s massive infrastructure and using it as a platform to covertly tap into communications processed by other companies....
SECRET FACEBOOKGOOGLEAPPLEIBMMICROSOFT SUMMIT... https://t.co/2gBLcYfCFH
— DRUDGE REPORT (@DRUDGE_REPORT) June 25, 2018
GOOGLE, Obama plan to control news... https://t.co/eY5d7RNAP8
— DRUDGE REPORT (@DRUDGE_REPORT) June 26, 2018
California Considers Creating 'Fake News Advisory Group' To Monitor Media... https://t.co/s7VrqCMZmx
— DRUDGE REPORT (@DRUDGE_REPORT) June 26, 2018
Wednesday, April 11, 2018
Zuckerberg to the American people: Says Obama Staffer Lied About Alliance With Facebook
LIVE COVERAGE: Zuckerberg spars with Congress during second day of testimony https://t.co/BM5PWU5MLf pic.twitter.com/KwRlalegr3
— The Hill (@thehill) April 11, 2018
Congressional Hearing Turns Up Heat... https://t.co/jZntihewop
— DRUDGE REPORT (@DRUDGE_REPORT) April 11, 2018
— NewsBusters (@newsbusters) April 11, 2018
While testifying in front of the Energy and Commerce Committee, Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg said the former Obama campaign staffer who claimed the company allowed the Obama campaign to do things “they wouldn’t have allowed someone else to do because they were on our side” was lying....
Scalise asked:
… One of the lead digital heads of the Obama campaign said recently: “Facebook was surprised we were able to suck out the whole social graph, but they didn't stop us once they realized that was what we were doing. They came to office in the days following election recruiting and were very candid that they allowed us to do things they wouldn't have allowed someone else to do because they were on our side.” Now, that's a direct quote from one of the heads of the Obama digital team. What would she mean by they, Facebook, were on our side?Zuckerberg responded that Facebook “didn't allow the Obama campaign to do anything that any developer on the platform wouldn't have otherwise been able to do.”
$FB CEO Mark Zuckerberg says that the site "collects data from people who have not signed up for Facebook for security purposes." pic.twitter.com/ym4STsaoif
— Neil Cavuto (@TeamCavuto) April 11, 2018
Zuckerberg to the American people pic.twitter.com/7p3FFoD0B1
— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) April 11, 2018
"Historical facts should never be censored, and Facebook should be ashamed of this behavior."
— PJ Media (@PJMedia_com) April 10, 2018
Members of Congress won't discuss this story today, but @Tyler2ONeil will. #Zuckerberg https://t.co/iiPR5tvy3g
Check your settings… pic.twitter.com/xTKxaOFICG
— MATT DRUDGE (@DRUDGE) April 11, 2018
Zuckerberg Acknowledges 'Error' in Targeting Diamond and Silk https://t.co/cSlqONMCTN
— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) April 11, 2018
Mark Zuckerberg openly admitted that Silicon Valley is “extremely left leaning” and that political bias is a problem he is concerned about. pic.twitter.com/wdOpcIbYqy
— Gab: Free Speech Social Network (@getongab) April 11, 2018
Tony Cardenas just asked Mark Zuckerberg to be a "leader" and help create more regulations for social media users. If the regulations in question are ones that Facebook approves and advises on, it is bad news for all future tech companies.
— Pardes Seleh (@PardesSeleh) April 11, 2018
.@senatorleahy grilled #Zuckerberg on privacy and while gathering his own Facebook data on his campaign website https://t.co/LofwcCOrzT
— Competitive Enterprise Institute (@ceidotorg) April 11, 2018
“...We Vermonters believe in privacy,” Sen. Leahy proudly proclaimed.
Yet, a quick visit to his website, https://www.leahyforvermont.com/, with the Chrome extension “Facebook Pixel Helper” reveals that Sen. Leahy has a Facebook pixel, invisible to users, that gathers user data of Facebook users who visit the site. (For a quick primer on what “pixels” do, visit Facebook’s resource guide on the data-gathering tool.)
That’s right, if you visit Senator Leahy’s campaign website, it’s likely your data, including your demographics and what pages you looked at on the site, have been placed into a custom data targeting audience by Leahy’s team....
GOP lawmaker shreds Zuckerberg for labeling conservative content: "Diamond and Silk is not terrorism" https://t.co/TklPrZgSWS pic.twitter.com/eWRqsY1O9H
— The Hill (@thehill) April 11, 2018
Tuesday, April 10, 2018
Here's how to watch Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg's Senate testimony today
In about 2 hours...
— CSPAN (@cspan) April 10, 2018
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies before @senatecommerce & @senjudiciary – LIVE at 2:15pm ET on C-SPAN3, @cspanRadio & online here: https://t.co/mKRk6i9Bj8 pic.twitter.com/NhFn1Y6yQi
Here's how to watch Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg's Senate testimony today:https://t.co/DGZD2C2WVg
— IJR (@TheIJR) April 10, 2018
More pre-Zuckerberg hearing reading:
— Lawfare (@lawfareblog) April 10, 2018
- The Cambridge Analytica-Facebook Debacle: A Legal Primer, by @andrewkwoods: https://t.co/ex2RtdMjrB
- How Cambridge Analytica, Facebook and Other Privacy Abuses Could Have Been Prevented, by @djweitzner: https://t.co/bj6gcWLrWM
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse and Reps. Kurt Schrader and Joe Kennedy III are members of the House and Senate committees that will question Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg. The three of them hold shares in the social media platform. https://t.co/CMzpm7XLn1
— Roll Call (@rollcall) April 10, 2018
As Zuckerberg faces Congress, Claire McCaskill is "besties" with Facebook execs and beneficiary of their cash https://t.co/C81p2w6ZNo by @emilyjashinsky pic.twitter.com/EjqlXIpE6w
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) April 10, 2018
Monday, April 9, 2018
"An apology from Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg is not enough. "They have not changed and they continue to make billions of dollars."
Digital Trends Editor-In-Chief Jeremy Kaplan (@SmashDawg) told us at @FoxBusiness that an apology from Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg is not enough. "They have not changed and they continue to make billions of dollars." pic.twitter.com/8fdhpLflZg
— Neil Cavuto (@TeamCavuto) April 9, 2018
Full text: Mark Zuckerberg testimony to Congress on Cambridge Analyticahttps://t.co/WPIxgAkxbl pic.twitter.com/L6pa7mpMYI
— POLITICO (@politico) April 9, 2018
Wednesday, April 4, 2018
Oppressive YOUTUBE Censorship Policies Spill Over to Violence
The New York Times, Washington Post, and USA Today all ran stories on the shooting at YouTube HQ on the inside pages, with a small photo or blurb on the front page. Not such big news? Or doesn’t fit the familiar narrative? https://t.co/7Z5xRRMkQ2 pic.twitter.com/yrbA9JQbsL
— Jim Geraghty (@jimgeraghty) April 4, 2018
Oppressive YOUTUBE Censorship Policies Spill Over to Violence... https://t.co/6eOEEUIgsq
— DRUDGE REPORT (@DRUDGE_REPORT) April 4, 2018
What If She’d Been an NRA Member? Nets Skimp on YouTube Shooter’s Animal Rights Extremism https://t.co/YSPc62S6TQ #TTT pic.twitter.com/MxFc3UpweG
— Scott Whitlock (@ScottJW) April 4, 2018
Tuesday, May 9, 2017
49% believe the #federal #government is responsible for making sure that all Americans have #healthcare
49% believe the #federal #government is responsible for making sure that all Americans have #healthcare. https://t.co/T1vuasBXV3 pic.twitter.com/8EwQMSvGuD
— Rasmussen Reports (@Rasmussen_Poll) May 9, 2017
Saturday, March 18, 2017
#NY #BILL WOULD SUPPRESS NON-#GOVT-APPROVED SPEECH...
#NY #BILL WOULD SUPPRESS NON-#GOVT-APPROVED SPEECH... https://t.co/J6pAEVuWv2
— Drudge Report (@drudgeheadlines) March 16, 2017
Thursday, September 8, 2016
FEC commish: Dems to "amend" First Amendment and outlaw conservative speech
FEC commish: Dems to "amend" First Amendment and outlaw conservative speech https://t.co/Ns5uFXj3UC pic.twitter.com/KavyG5kM2l
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) September 8, 2016
Sunday, June 26, 2016
Poll: Half of Voters Distrust Government on Gun Control After Orlando Terror Attack
Poll: Half of Voters Distrust Government on Gun Control After Orlando Terror Attack - Breitbart https://t.co/FZkGN7CNqW via @BreitbartNews
— AWR Hawkins (@AWRHawkins) June 26, 2016
Friday, June 24, 2016
US Customs wants to collect social media account names at the border
US Customs wants to collect social media account names at the border https://t.co/wc7MTZJHkU
— WhiteHousePressCorps (@whpresscorps) June 25, 2016
Your Twitter handle may soon be part of the US visa process....It’s unclear from the proposal how thoroughly officials will examine the social profiles, although it’s clear they will be used for investigative purposes. "Collecting social media data will enhance the existing investigative process and provide DHS greater clarity and visibility to possible nefarious activity and connections," the announcement reads.
The public has 60 days to comment on the new proposal before it will be formally considered. Comments can be mailed to Customs and Border Patrol at its Washington office.
Immigration and intelligence agencies have been under increasing pressure to scrutinize social media profiles after the San Bernardino shooting in December of last year. One of the attackers had posted a public announcement on Facebook during the shooting, and had previously sent private Facebook messages to friends discussing violent attacks. Crucially, the private messages were sent before receiving her visa. That news provoked some criticism, although investigators would have needed significantly more than a screen name to see the messages. State Department officials claimed to be reviewing the visa application processes in the wake of the attacks.
Thursday, June 16, 2016
Privacy advocates startled...
FBI Facial Recognition Software Accuracy Concerns... https://t.co/K94NP3k7YT
— DRUDGE REPORT (@DRUDGE_REPORT) June 15, 2016
Privacy advocates startled... https://t.co/M6vw49Eyk7
— DRUDGE REPORT (@DRUDGE_REPORT) June 15, 2016
'Law-abiding Americans never notified of enrollment'... https://t.co/tdlJgLG1C2
— DRUDGE REPORT (@DRUDGE_REPORT) June 15, 2016
Wednesday, May 18, 2016
No, #CommonCore hasn't been shown to work. Newest Test Scores are Bad News for Centralized Education, Common Core
No, #CommonCore hasn't been shown to work. Indeed, the latest NAEP suggests the opposite https://t.co/ZCVH9yPCNp via @CatoInstitute
— Neal McCluskey (@NealMcCluskey) April 28, 2016
...Not only has there been no meaningful evidence of the Core’s effectiveness, but right after I read Holtz-Eakins’ piece I saw that the latest National Assessment of Educational Progress scores had come out – indeed, for the very 12th grade students on the verge of college – and they had dropped in both reading and math between 2013 and 2015, and some dropped going back to 2009. This was, of course, as Common Core was being implemented nationwide. And not only did aggregate scores drop, but also scores for numerous racial and ethnic groups....
Saturday, April 30, 2016
Polls show 50% of Democrats have no problem with gov't owning or controlling the private sector
Polls show 50% of Democrats have no problem with gov't owning or controlling the private sector. https://t.co/6skVH1jHRD #tcot
— IBDeditorials (@IBDeditorials) April 30, 2016
Tuesday, March 22, 2016
"Government has become about as popular as a swarm of mosquitoes carrying the Zika virus."
"Government has become about as popular as a swarm of mosquitoes carrying the Zika virus." @JonCoupal https://t.co/VlvsG4POyh #CAPolitics
— HJTA.org (@HJTA) March 21, 2016
Thursday, March 10, 2016
“Nobody likes #Obamacare”
.@NFIB_AZ member says he has to reduce benefits in order to afford #healthcare for his employees. #DemDebatehttps://t.co/wsFrBsD2td
— NFIB (@NFIB) March 10, 2016
“Nobody likes #Obamacare,” a frank opinion from @NFIB_WI #smallbiz owner. #DemDebatehttps://t.co/7FRU48DaIt
— NFIB (@NFIB) March 10, 2016
Saturday, February 20, 2016
Here’s the REAL reason the FBI needs Apple’s help in cracking terrorist’s iPhone
Legal war begins between Apple and the FBI https://t.co/Nw3OBCylBn pic.twitter.com/gagm6N4ixE
— The Hill (@thehill) February 20, 2016
Oh boy: Here's the REAL reason the FBI needs Apple's help in cracking terrorist's iPhone https://t.co/Q2uyfNxVzK pic.twitter.com/5i1UUojHdW
— Allen West (@AllenWest) February 20, 2016
To give some background information, San Bernardino killer Syed Farook’s iPhone (which the FBI wants to access) is password-protected, and Apple claims that creating a backdoor to the iPhone could be disastrous in the wrong hands. Others think this is all one big PR stunt for the company.
Regardless of Apple’s intentions, the FBI wouldn’t need their help if it wasn’t for the government’s own incompetency. Just get a load of what The Gateway Pundit reported:
Apple responded on Friday evening saying the FBI changed the password to Farook’s phone and then forgot it.ABC has more:
The password for the San Bernardino shooter’s iCloud account associated with his iPhone was reset hours after authorities took possession of the device.
The Justice Department acknowledged in its court filing that the password of Syed Farook’s iCloud account had been reset. The filing states, “the owner [San Bernardino County Department of Public Health], in an attempt to gain access to some information in the hours after the attack, was able to reset the password remotely, but that had the effect of eliminating the possibility of an auto-backup.”
Apple could have recovered information from the iPhone had the iCloud password not been reset, the company said. If the phone was taken to a location where it recognized the Wi-Fi network, such as the San Bernardino shooters’ home, it could have been backed up to the cloud, Apple suggested.
San Bernardino's shooter's Apple iCloud password changed while his iPhone was in possession of authorities: https://t.co/xEITv1McLq
— ABC News (@ABC) February 20, 2016
The real reason that Apple won't unlock a terrorist's phone https://t.co/LuhxUZtRf8 pic.twitter.com/HaOMMyPAhJ
— The Independent (@Independent) February 20, 2016
Op-ed columnist: Can Apple Please Answer This One Question About iPhone Security For Me Before I Die?https://t.co/GPmfa2K7y9
— Independent Journal (@INJO) February 20, 2016
Legislators in N.Y. and Calif. want authorities to be able to bypass encryption firewalls https://t.co/yORHnd1JAr pic.twitter.com/4BQNJhMCo0
— Bloomberg Business (@business) February 20, 2016
Why Apple is fighting the most powerful government on the planet https://t.co/fIBbQHC783 pic.twitter.com/JDkSP5rW4L
— TechCrunch (@TechCrunch) February 20, 2016
Really thoughtful piece on Apple vs the FBI, by Fred Kaplan in @Slate https://t.co/QRH0CXa4Ou
— Fareed Zakaria (@FareedZakaria) February 20, 2016
The FBI is saying every citizen is a potential terrorist, and all phones should be easily accessed…just in case. https://t.co/IvIaOXmhGp
— The Federalist (@FDRLST) February 20, 2016
DOJ Willing To Compromise With Apple On Helping Hack Terrorist’s iPhone https://t.co/CQ2SbeJ8RV
— Fox Nation (@foxnation) February 20, 2016
Raise your voice against FBI demands to undermine the security of your devices: https://t.co/1YHibOnZ7H
— EFF (@EFF) February 20, 2016
No, Apple has not unlocked 70 iPhones for law enforcement https://t.co/3GcFEF4htH
— TechCrunch (@TechCrunch) February 20, 2016
Ex-NSA Chief Backs APPLE Over 'Back Doors'... https://t.co/pUzpaNnzEh
— DRUDGE REPORT (@DRUDGE_REPORT) February 22, 2016
Thursday, September 17, 2015
When we first wrote about this idea two years ago, it really seemed like an Orwellian joke – the fact that the government was establishing a task force dedicated to studying how it could get you to do what it thinks is best for you.
What Obama just ordered the government to do to Americans is beyond creepy http://t.co/jzhgi2OFDh pic.twitter.com/jIfeBQuB9V
— Allen West (@AllenWest) September 17, 2015As Richard Williams wrote for Politico at the time, “Congress did not pass legislation authorizing such activity; this is something dreamt up by bureaucracies to force their own preferences on citizens, whether by combating obesity or discouraging procrastination when it comes to saving for retirement.”
But the Obama administration never lets a little thing like legislation get in his way, right? No, he just signs it into effect via executive order.
As the Daily Caller reports, on Tuesday, “President Obama announced a new executive order which authorizes federal agencies to conduct behavioral experiments on U.S. citizens in order to advance government initiatives...."
Tuesday, September 15, 2015
Seattle sued over recycling inspectors keeping tabs on residents' trash
Awesome coverage by @FoxNews on our Seattle trash snooping case. MUST WATCH! http://t.co/XE0GBGRpLo #DontTrashMyPrivacy
— PLF - Pacific Legal (@PacificLegal) September 14, 2015Seattle sued over recycling inspectors keeping tabs on residents' trash http://t.co/opDqPYbvXd pic.twitter.com/oIWgTLi4cD
— Fox News (@FoxNews) September 14, 2015
Tuesday, September 8, 2015
In Colombia, the worst fears of the surveillance state are on display
In Colombia, the worst fears of the surveillance state are on display http://t.co/pe53ojaSo2 pic.twitter.com/uQ82NcmQqo
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) September 8, 2015A handful of companies based in Italy, Israel, the United Kingdom, New Zealand and the U.S. have sold surveillance technology to authorities in Colombia, according to research published this month by the UK-based Privacy International. The technology enables Colombian law enforcement and intelligence agencies to engage in surveillance activities similar to those conducted by the National Security Agency in the U.S.
The technology allows Colombian police to do things such as hack electronic devices unbeknownst to users, install offensive malware that allow for remote access and control, and harvest telephone data en masse. Like the U.S., Colombian law doesn't necessarily allow for such surveillance to take place. "This type of mass, automated surveillance is not explicitly authorized under Colombian law," the researchers note....
The government's disregard for the law doesn't end with respect to surveillance, the researchers note. "Accounts of the illegal interception of private communications pervade accounts of extrajudicial disappearances and killings," they state.