Showing posts with label Nuclear Option. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nuclear Option. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 12, 2017

WE DIDN'T ELECT GOP TO COMPROMISE!



Exclusive: Mason Weaver says it was past time for Republicans to no nuclear in Senate...

Because the Republican Party still believes they can work with, find common ground with and reach out to Democrats. Democrats, who have delayed President Trumps’ Cabinet appointees, launched a phony “Russian” probe and constantly call names, attacking and organizing against the Trump administration.

What hope would you have in finding common ground with someone throwing bricks at your head? Where can we find any evidence of a cooperative DNC, moderate Democrats in Congress or the “fake news,” trying to work things out with us?

They have spent ALL of their efforts planning, organizing and raising money to disrupt and delegitimize the current government. We see calls for impeachment, cursing out the president by the DNC chairman, and support for sanctuary cities and other illegal actions at the grass-roots level. What we have not seen is cooperation, debates, reaching out or any attempt to find common ground.

Democrats have sent in their warriors while we are still sending in our diplomats. It was past time Thursday to launch the nuclear option and get to governing our nation. We have to repair nine years of neglect, wasteful spending, debilitating taxes, regulations and the funding of our enemies. We have to rebuild our military, correct the failed education system and put Americans back to work.

What we do not have time for is the silly delay games from our sworn enemies....

Friday, April 7, 2017

GORSUCH CONFIRMED







Thursday, April 6, 2017

It's time for the Senate to #ConfirmGorsuch















Friday, February 10, 2017

Remember when liberals gave Sen. Reid a standing ovation for using the nuclear option? They're sorry now.



Monday, December 15, 2014

Yes, Congress can stop Obama's immigration action

Think Congress can't stop President Obama's unilateral executive action on immigration? It can. - Byron York/Washington Examiner @ByronYork
All money spent by the federal government is under the ultimate control of Congress. If they choose, lawmakers can issue exquisitely detailed instructions on how federal dollars are spent. For proof, look no further than the 1,695-page spending bill passed by Congress over the weekend.

A particular phrase, "none of the funds," appears in the bill more than 450 times. In each case, Congress used those words to dictate how money can and cannot be spent.

The first two times the phrase appears in the bill concern a $1.2 billion appropriation for salaries and expenses at the Farm Service Agency, part of the Agriculture Department. "None of the funds available to the Farm Service Agency shall be used to close Farm Service Agency county offices," the bill says. In addition, "none of the funds available to the Farm Service Agency shall be used to permanently relocate county-based employees that would result in an office with two or fewer employees without prior notification and approval of the Committee on Appropriations."

That's pretty specific. The Agriculture Department can't close Farm Service Agencies or reorganize them, if the result is an office with fewer than three employees, unless specifically approved by Congress. That's using the power of the purse to dictate precisely what a government agency can do.

That level of detail continues throughout the bill....

Those are just a few examples of Congress using its power of the purse to tell the executive branch precisely what it may and may not do. There are many, many, many more — just in the new bill.

And that's nothing new; this sort of restriction, and many of the specific ones in the new spending bill, have been in appropriations measures for years and years.

Under Obama's immigration order, federal offices will process the cases of illegal immigrants in a variety of ways, awarding them work permits, assigning Social Security numbers, and distributing federal transfer payments. Given the routine restrictions of all sorts of federal actions in the new spending bill, and the thousands of such restrictions in similar bills over the years, does anyone believe Congress cannot limit what the president does on immigration?

Yes, lawmakers have to be united to act. But if they choose, they can stop Obama cold. KEEP READING

The 'nuclear option' worked for Dems. Will the GOP reconsider? - Susan Ferrechio/Washington Examiner
On Nov. 21, 2013, Senate Democrats made a historic rules change to end filibusters of judicial and executive branch nominees.

The move, which lowered the confirmation threshold from 60 votes to 51 votes, was considered so drastic that lawmakers labeled it the “nuclear option.”

It could soon backfire on Democrats, now that Republicans are about to take the Senate majority and, by 2016, possibly the White House....

Monday, January 13, 2014

The IRS scandal and the Senate nuke are daggers held at the GOP's throat. If they are allowed to remain in place, the two-party system is dead.

House Republicans gotta stop acting like Caspar Milquetoast - Mark Tapscott/Washington Examiner

Baseball's Leo "The Lip" Durocher was famously credited for saying "nice guys finish last." House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell could learn a few things from Durocher.

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa revealed last week that the individual leading President Obama's investigation of the IRS scandal is one of his long-time donors.

As today's Washington Examiner editorial observes, putting an Obama donor in charge of the probe of IRS targeting and harrassment of the president's toughest critics is the equivalent of the chief executive waving a middle finger at Boehner, McConnell and the rest of the congressional Republicans.

Then there is Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's bullying of McConnell and the upper chamber's Republicans, which has been cheered by the Obama White House.

Not only has Reid rendered the Senate GOP impotent by denying them virtually any opportunities to introduce amendments, he and the Democratic majority exercised the "nuclear option" that ended the filibuster against most presidential nominees.

The result is the only difference between the Senate and the House is one has more members. Otherwise, both are simply majority rule legislative bodies, thus enabling the very factional tyranny so feared by the Founders....

Saturday, November 23, 2013

Silver Lining For GOP: Nuclear Option Could Make Repealing ObamaCare Easier

Conservatives are outraged over Harry Reid pulling the trigger on the so-called nuclear option in the Senate, making it impossible for Republicans to stop President Obama from nominating anyone he wants to positions in the government.

But some on the right are finding comfort in the theory that Reid’s legislative maneuver could actually make it easier for Republicans to eventually repeal Obamacare — if all the pieces come together in 2017.

...“There’s no limiting principle in the principle they’re invoking,” Will said on Special Report on Fox News on Thursday night. “That is majorities should rule all the time.”

He continued: “What this means is if in the spring of 2017 there’s a Republican president, which there could be, the Republicans still hold the House, and they have 51 senators, they can repeal Obamacare with 51 votes. And I’m not sure the people who did this today have thought this.”

They think it’s very likely that they will lose their Senate majority in 2014. They are essentially writing off the last two years of Obama’s presidency, which means getting as much done as possible right now.

Democrats Give Up 2014 With the Filibuster - Megan McArdle/Bloomberg

I’m not going to insult your intelligence by pretending there’s a right and a wrong side in the just-concluded battle over the filibuster. At this point, arguments about the justice of the filibuster are entirely instrumental: At this point, arguments about the justice of the filibuster are entirely instrumental: To know what someone is going to write, you need only know which party they supported in the last election....

What’s left to discuss is what this means.

Thursday, November 21, 2013

"What’s really going on with this so-called nuclear option is that Obama wants to run this nation out of the Oval Office."


Mark Levin: This nation is in grave jeopardy like nothing I’ve ever seen before… - The Right Scoop



Mark Levin Goes Nuclear On Obama, Reid, McConnell Over Filibuster Vote - Nice Deb

NYTIMES hails return of 'Democracy' to Senate...
FLASHBACK 2005: NYT 'We were wrong'...

Naked Emperor: The real Obama is coming into sight for the American people for the first time, and they don’t like what they see. - Le-gal In-sur-rec-tion

...There are dangers in what Obama has done. But the bigger point is that slowly but surely he is stripping down to who he really is.

From NSA spying run amok, to usurpation of congressional power through administrative orders, to lying to the American people about keeping their plans, the real Obama is coming into sight for the American people for the first time,

And as the current polling reflects, they don’t like this Emperor without clothes.

BREAK THE RULES


SENATE DEMOCRATS DETONATE “NUCLEAR OPTION” BARRING NOMINEE FILIBUSTER - John Hayward/Human Events @Doc_o

Today, the odious Harry Reid didn’t have much to say about the Founding Fathers and their vision of checks, balances, and extended debate. He very much wants one person, the increasingly dictatorial Barack Obama, and his Party to have total control. He also very much wants everyone to stop talking about the ObamaCare disaster. Democrats desperately needed a distraction, a political win, and enough power to set the table before they risk becoming a Senate minority in the next election. They changed the rule on a party-line vote, 52-48, actually losing three of their number – Carl Levin of Michigan, Joe Manchin of West Virginia, and Mark Pryor of Arkansas – who sided with the Republican opposition.

Reid, Democrats trigger ‘nuclear’ option; eliminate most filibusters on nominees - Paul Kane/Washington Post
The rule change means federal judge nominees and executive-office appointments can be confirmed by a simple majority of senators, rather than the 60-vote super majority that has been required for more than two centuries.

The change does not apply to Supreme Court nominations. But the vote, mostly along party lines, reverses nearly 225 years of precedent and dramatically alters the landscape for both Democratic and Republican presidents, especially if their own political party holds a majority of, but fewer than 60, Senate seats.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) accused Democrats of a power grab and suggested that they will regret their decision if Republicans regain control of the chamber.

“We’re not interested in having a gun put to our head any longer,” McConnell said. “Some of us have been around here long enough to know that the shoe is sometimes on the other foot.” McConnell then addressed Democrats directly, saying: “You may regret this a lot sooner than you think,” he said.









Democrats Have Amnesia About Using the Nuclear Option Ending Filibusters - caffeinatedthoughts

This was a mistake, and it’s amazing how Democrats have forgotten the arguments they employed when Republicans wrongly considered and rightly rejected such a move under President George W. Bush.

In 2005 then Senator Barack Obama called for his colleagues considering the nuclear option to consider “free and democratic debate.” : “Mr. President, I rise today to urge my colleagues to think about the implications of what has been called the nuclear option and what effect that might have on this Chamber and on this country. I urge all of us to think not just about winning every debate but about protecting free and democratic debate.” (Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL), Floor Remarks, Washington, DC, 4/13/05)

Obama: “The American people want less partisanship in this town, but everyone in this chamber knows that if the majority chooses to end the filibuster, if they choose to change the rules and put an end to democratic debate, then the fighting, the bitterness, and the gridlock will only get worse.” (Sen. Barack Obama, Floor Remarks, Washington, D.C., 4/13/05)



FLASHBACK: Obama: No on Nuclear Option, Must Protect ‘Free and Democratic Debate - Washington Free Beacon
OBAMA, 2005: NUCLEAR OPTION WILL MAKE 'BITTERNESS AND GRIDLOCK' WORSE - Breitbart



FLASHBACK: Biden on Nuclear Option: ‘It’s a Fundamental Power Grab’ - Washington Free Beacon

FLASHBACK: Reid in 2008: Nuclear Option 'Will Ruin Our Country' - JOHN MCCORMACK/WEEKLY STANDARD

This afternoon, Senate majority leader Harry Reid deployed the so-called "nuclear option," changing the Senate rules to get rid of the 60-vote requirement to end a filibuster on judicial nominees or cabinet nominees. The Washington Free Beacon reports that in 2008, Reid denounced Republican consideration of the "nuclear option" and vowed that he would never use it:
“As long as I am the Leader, the answer’s no,” he said. “I think we should just forget that. That is a black chapter in the history of the Senate. I hope we never, ever get to that again because I really do believe it will ruin our country.
Harry Reid's 'nuclear option,' then and now - Washington Examiner



GOP Leader McConnell: Nuclear Option Doesn’t ‘Distract from Obamacare,’ It ‘Reminds’ Voters of It (Video) - Gateway Pundit



Ted Cruz on Nuclear Option: Harry Reid broke his promise just like Obama - The Right Scoop

As President Obama said, They Got Away With It - Heritage

It could be a very fortunate catastrophe. Want to repeal Obamacare? Want to pass sweeping national restrictions on abortion? Want to drill for oil in Alaska? Harry Reid is in the process of making all that happen

Let’s get nuclear! Reid threatens to score an own-goal - conservativeintel.com

So, what happens if Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid comes forward next week and changes Senate rules with 51 votes — that is, he invokes the so-called nuclear option — in order to shoehorn in a couple of Obama nominees?