Showing posts with label Espionage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Espionage. Show all posts

Monday, April 3, 2017

EXPOSED! It Was Top Obama Official Susan Rice Who Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel























at Labels: , , , , , , ,

Friday, February 24, 2017

Obama’s Feds Tried to Hack Indiana’s Election System While Pence Was Governor

at Labels: , , , , , , ,

Sunday, July 10, 2016

The Problem



at Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, July 9, 2016

This has always been at the heart of why I think the Clintons are so repugnant


Comey was presented with a terrible set of options. He chose the one that would least damage his reputation and the reputation of his agency. I don’t like the decision, and I don’t agree with his arguments defending it. But the ultimate blame resides entirely with Hillary Clinton and her gang. They taint and politicize everything they touch, because they put their interests above everything else.


In a mere 11 days, arrogant, selfish actions by the Clintons contaminated three of the purest brands in Washington — Barack Obama, James Comey and Loretta Lynch — and jeopardized the futures of Hillary’s most loyal aides....
at Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, July 7, 2016

FBI Director Comey is basically trying to tell us it's rigged



Ann Coulter mentioned something today about the testimony of FBI Director James Comey and the manner of how he continually referenced people to re-read his initial statement about the Hillary Clinton investigation:

Is Director Comey, like Jeremiah Denton Jr, blinking T-O-R-T-U-R-E into the camera, only for Comey the coded message is C-O-E-R-C-I-O-N?











at Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

FBI DID NOT PUT HILLARY UNDER OATH













at Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, July 5, 2016

'She's crooked Hillary! Don't you understand that? This is one of the most crooked politicians in history!'





'It's corrupt! It's rigged! It's disgraceful!' Trump lets it all hang out after Hillary

'The question really has to be asked – is this: What is Hillary Clinton's motive? And to that, I'm even gonna say: Who cares? She's put us in danger,' Trump said to wild applause.

'And some people say that it's corrupt financially. I don't care what her motive is. All I know is she had a motive, but she's erased so many emails that we'll never find out, okay?'

'Bill and Hillary Clinton raked in millions of dollars from foreign governments, special interests and international corporations in exchange for favors, folks! For favors!' he yelled.

'She's crooked Hillary! Don't you understand that? This is one of the most crooked politicians in history!'

'The FBI today talked so horribly about this person,' he added later, 'to the point where you say, how can we possibly be talking about no charges?'

Trump said on a half-dozen occasions that Clinton had 'lied' to the American people.

'We now know that she lied to the country when she said she did not send classified information on her server,' Trump blasted. 'She lied!'
'She sent vast amounts of classified information, including information classified as Top Secret. Top Secret!'

Clinton is 'grossly incompetent... She would be such a lousy president, folks.'

at Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Snakes On A Plane:



...Attorney General Lynch goes to great lengths to walk through the parseltongue politispeak surrounding her meeting with Bill Clinton.

Pay attention to the phrases she is using. Specifically note the frequency of: “raises questions and concerns”, and “casts a shadow over how this case may be perceived”. Those phrases alone make the ethical case for recusal....

Lynch, a political appointee, will not recuse herself because that would mean she would be cut out of the loop, and the information to the Clinton camp -via the White House- would go dark.

President Obama and Hillary Clinton would lose their source to give them information on how the investigation is going. They would lose the advance notice. They would lose any control over what would be coming toward them.

That’s the problem.

That’s why Loretta Lynch will not recuse herself. (Read the rest at Conservative Treehouse)







There are two versions of the story of the meeting between Bill Clinton and Attorney General Lynch. Version 1 is that the husband of a top official facing potential indictment just hung out with the top official who gets to decide whether his wife gets indicted just talked casually.
Former President Bill Clinton spoke with Attorney General Loretta Lynch during an impromptu meeting in Phoenix, but Lynch said the discussion did not involve the investigation into Hillary Clinton's email use as secretary of state.

Lynch told reporters that the meeting at a Phoenix airport on Monday was unplanned and happened while the former president was waiting to depart and walked over to the attorney general's plane after she landed there.

Lynch was traveling with her husband and said her conversation with the former president "was a great deal about his grandchildren" and their travels.
So unplanned meeting that went on for around an hour and just invoked talk about Chelsea's kids. Here's the real life version.
Christopher Sign, the anchor for ABC 15 in Phoenix who broke the story, told Fox News host Bill O’Reilly Thursday, “She arrives, some people step off of her plane, the former president steps into her plane. They then speak for 30 minutes privately, the FBI there on the tarmac instructing everybody around, ‘no photos, no pictures, no cell phones.'”
When you have the FBI running around warning, no photos and no cell phones, those are specific instructions.

That means that they had orders to prevent any evidence of the chat from coming forward and those orders would have come from Lynch or one of her aides as Bill Clinton and his people have no authority to order the FBI to do anything. Which means that Lynch knew the meeting was wrong and tried to prevent it from coming to light. And you don't do that for a chat about the grandkids.

Which means that Lynch is also lying.









Bill Clinton is always looking for an edge and his meeting with the chief law enforcement officer of the United States just days before an FBI interrogation of his wife over a criminal investigation is subliminal and yet, to the point: if my wife is elected President, you get whatever you want....

















at Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, July 3, 2016

The QUESTION IS NOT whether you want the FBI to recommend Hillary be prosecuted. The QUESTION IS whether you think the FBI will recommend Hilary be prosecuted.



The poll will be open until Noon Eastern on Tuesday, July 5, 2016.















at Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, July 2, 2016

CROOKED HILLARY: POSSIBLE CHARGES INCLUDE ESPIONAGE ACT





















at Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, July 1, 2016

Loretta Lynch regrets meeting with Bill Clinton and wouldn’t do it again, especially knowing she might get caught



According to this source, whose credentials were checked and confirmed by the Observer with sources inside both the FBI and the United States Secret Service, the attorney general was caught completely off guard by the meeting and the source dismisses suggestions that have been raised alleging that she waited there to see Bill Clinton or accommodated his request to see him. In fact, it seems from this source that it was Bill Clinton who was maneuvering for face time with the attorney general, because his plane had been scheduled to leave before hers arrived.







at Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, January 3, 2015

U.S. Spies Say They Tracked ‘Sony Hackers’ For Years

◼ American spies have detailed dossiers on the North Koreans who the U.S. says were behind the Sony attack. But the still-secret evidence likely won’t convince skeptics. - Shane Harris/Daily Beast
Ever since the Obama administration made its public case against North Korea for the Sony hack, a slew of independent cybersecurity experts have been skeptical of the government’s public case against Pyongyang, calling it flimsy and circumstantial. But sources familiar with the investigation say that the most damning evidence against the Sony hackers was obtained in a secret, and years earlier, during previous intelligence-gathering efforts. The notion that the FBI was basing its claims of North Korean culpability solely off evidence from the Sony hack is “completely untrue. They’re also using evidence that they’ve been collecting for years,” said one person privy to some details of the investigation.

If there are misgivings within the administration about holding North Korea publicly to account, they weren’t on display on Friday. The White House and the Treasury Department announced a round of sanctions against three North Korean organizations, among them the country’s intelligence bureau, and ten individuals, including government officials and others who work for a North Korea’s main weapons dealer.

The sanctioned individuals weren’t involved in the Sony attack, administration officials said. But the decision to punish them and by extension the North Korean regime came after the White House decided the Sony hack “crossed a threshold,” as one senior administration official put it, going beyond cyber espionage or harassing attacks on Web sites and into the realm of destruction and coercion. The intruders had deleted large amounts of data from Sony’s networks, and threatened to attack movie theatres that showed Sony’s North Korean satire, The Interview....
◼ If you think this is weird, read the next one. - Join the Discussion at Lucianne
at Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, July 30, 2013

WIKILEAKER GUILTY ON 20 CHARGES, NOT AIDING THE ENEMY

◼ Bradley Manning trial verdict: Acquitted of aiding the enemy, convicted on lesser charges - Politico
◼ Private First Class Bradley Manning, the former Army intelligence officer charged with leaking 700,000 classified military and diplomatic files through WikiLeaks, has been found not guilty of aiding the enemy. - Human Events
◼ Bradley Manning could still die in jail despite being found NOT GUILTY of Aiding the Enemy - as military judge rules army private is guilty of 20 charges for passing 700,000 secret files to WikiLeaks - Daily Mail

Not Guilty of Aiding Enemy...
Guilty in slew of lesser charges...
Still faces lengthy prison term...
Largest leak in US history...
ASSANGE: 'Hero'...
at Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, July 26, 2013

Assange: Journalism Doomed if Manning Convicted of Aiding Enemy

◼ During a Friday conference call with reporters WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and Pentagon Papers leaker Daniel Ellsberg sketched an apocalyptic vision of journalism's future if Pfc. Bradley Manning is convicted of aiding the enemy. - US News & World Report

...Manning's conviction would "forever change the ability of journalists to reveal the most important crimes of the state," Assange said. "It is an attempt to redefine how journalism is done."

...Assange says President Barack Obama is deliberately seeking to expand the use of the Espionage Act to cover journalists reporting on leaked material.

"There's a harmonization of approach to get up this new legal theory regarding the Espionage Act," he said, referencing the involvement of Fox News reporter James Rosen and New York Times reporter James Risen in criminal leak probes as part of "an extremely worrying path the Obama administration has gone down."

The Australian-born secret-spiller predicted the U.S. Supreme Court may ultimately invalidate parts of the Espionage Act.

Using the Espionage Act, Obama is "effectively rewriting the Constitution," Assange said. The First Amendment, he noted, has "no exception for an embarrassed military or an embarrassed White House. What part of 'no' does President Barack Obama not understand?"
at Labels: , , , , ,

Saturday, December 1, 2012

WikiLeaks attempts to redress the imbalance of power.

◼ Assange: Entire nations intercepted online, key turned to totalitarian rule - RT

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange says all the necessary physical infrastructure for absolute totalitarianism through the internet is ready. He told RT that the question now is whether the turnkey process that already started will go all the way.

...whoever physically controls this controls the realm of our ideas and communications. And whoever is able to sit on those communications channels, can intercept entire nations, and that’s the new game in town, as far as state spying is concerned – intercepting entire nations, not individuals.

...'it is cheaper to intercept every individual rather that it is to pick particular people to spy upon'...

Do you know what you were thinking one year, two days, three months ago? No, you don’t know, but Google knows, it remembers.

The National Security Agency who intercepts the request if it flowed over the US border, it knows.

So by just communicating to our friends, by emailing each other, by updating Facebook profiles, we are informing on our friends.

'by updating Facebook profiles, we are informing on our friends...'
at Labels: , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)