Showing posts with label CPRA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CPRA. Show all posts

Thursday, May 19, 2016

Brown administration’s hollow offer to open child abuse records...the administration seeks to muzzle the information it claims to be releasing



The conditions offered by the administration raise questions about whose interests are being protected. Certainly, the interests of the young victims of abuse don’t seem to be at the forefront of the administration’s thinking.

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Transparency in California Should Not Be Optional

Transparency in California Should Not Be Optional - Electronic Frontier Foundation

AB 76 was passed by the legislature Friday evening, unbeknownst to many journalists and open-government advocates attempting to follow the vote....

Senate Bill 71 and AB 76, which could be passed and sent to the governor's offiice on Saturday, would allow government bodies on the local level—such as cities, counties, sheriff’s departments and education systems—to choose whether or not to follow certain requirements under the California Public Records Act. These provisions would be downgraded from law to mere “best practices.” Gone would be the deadlines for determining whether records are disclosable and notifying the member of the public who requested the records. Gone would be the requirement that agencies assist members of the public in identifying which records would answer their questions. Gone would be the mandate that agencies turn over documents in an electronic format if the records have already been digitized.

A local government wouldn’t even have to publicly disclose its records-disclosure policy in writing. The bills only say an agency must “announce orally” once a year if it decides not to follow the new “best practices.”

The impact on government watchdogs, journalists and the public—including EFF—would be profound. The legislation would create long waits for access to records, allow agencies to interpret requests narrowly (say, rejecting requests unless the citizen asks for a specific document), and leave the requesters waiting in limbo indefinitely as government agencies will have no incentive to be helpful.

California Legislature Guts State Records Law - courthousenews.com

"It's not about saving money - it's all about curtailing an open, transparent government that can be held accountable," Yee told the San Jose Mercury News. "The only way we're held accountable is when the public has the information to understand what were doing."

EDITORIAL: Tell Brown to veto attack on Public Records Act - The Fresno Bee

The unbridled arrogance of government is on full display, here in California and across our great land. In the name of security and the war on terror, the federal government is prying ever deeper into the lives of law-abiding Americans, eroding civil liberties and owning up to the deeds only after a whistle-blower calls them to the public's attention.

Meanwhile, in California, a Legislature controlled by a Democrat supermajority and in concert with Gov. Jerry Brown, wants citizens to know as little as possible about the workings of local government.

On Friday, lawmakers approved a pair of budget trailer bills (SB 71 and AB 76) that would free local governments of the obligation to comply with certain aspects of the California Public Records Act. The bills zipped through the Legislature with little or no committee review. Lawmakers clearly wanted to rubber stamp potentially embarrassing legislation under cover from prying eyes.

This is just the latest assault on sunshine. Last year, to avoid paying reimbursements, lawmakers and the governor suspended notice mandates for public meetings. This year, lawmakers considered imposing a $10-per-file fee on the public to look at court records. Fortunately, a conference committee killed that bill.

Public pressure can make a difference again. Urge the governor to reject SB 71 and AB 76 by contacting him at: ◼ http://govnews.ca.gov/gov39mail/mail.php

Sunday, February 10, 2013

Humboldt: Transparency and Public Records Act Requests


Humboldt County, release the numbers - TIMES-STANDARD EDITORIAL

Humboldt County is spending your tax dollars to prevent you from seeing how it's spending your tax dollars.

The story so far, short version: The Humboldt Coalition for Property Rights filed a California Public Records Act request in December 2011 requesting information about pending litigation against the county related to land use, planning and the county's general plan update, including the fees of outside attorneys who worked on the suits. The county, in HumCPR's view, proved less than cooperative.

About one year ago, HumCPR filed a complaint in court, seeking the information.
The county has been wasting time -- and money -- ever since....

It doesn't matter who's asking the county for this information, or why. Under the law, this information belongs to all of us. It's ours. It's public money, spent by public officials. This is not a matter of international espionage. We are not the enemy. We are the public. The public has a right to know what public money is spent on, even as it's being spent.

Humboldt County should release the facts before its overt lack of transparency and disregard for its legal obligation to release public information costs the very taxpayers it purports to represent any more money -- or any more faith in their public officials.

A $64,000 question: Does the county have to disclose attorney fees to date? Counsel: Early release could lead to 'mischief,' would reveal strategy - Grant Scott-Goforth/The Times-Standard 2/03/2013

Paul Nicholas Boylan, an attorney who specializes in government transparency and public records requests, said he advises governments to release attorney billing records....

Boylan did not agree with Humboldt County counsel's assertion that billing information would give away legal strategy.

”That's a really bad argument,” he said. “The county is going to lose this litigation. It's going to be denied by any competent court.”

Humboldt Coalition for Property Rights files suit against county - Times-Standard 3/23/2012

HumCPR Chairman Lee Ulansey said the county is required to provide the documents within 10 days and has failed to do so. He said the county is spending a fortune on land-use lawsuits and that the public has a right to know exactly how much is being spent.

”We believe that the citizens should know how much money is being spent on lawsuits on private property issues,” Ulansey said in a press release. “Particularly in these difficult economic times, the public needs to know how much money is being diverted to often unnecessary litigation.”