Sunday, January 4, 2015

New York Times ONLY tolerates Protests on behalf of Thugs and Criminals such as Michael Brown and Eric Garner

What does the NYTimes have to say when New York Police give silent protest to nutjob Mayor Bill de Blasio in the form of a silent protest or a mild heckle? “These are disgraceful acts” says the NYTimes. Ha, ain’t that RICH? - Femisex

The CRAZY Times says such peaceful protesting by police demonstrates a “snarling sense of victimhood that seems to be motivating the anti-de Blasio campaign...” Nevermind the fact the de Blasio (aka Big Bird) has slapped and slapped at police since he took office and…even in the face of the cold-blooded execution of two NYPD, Big Birdy boiled mad when it is suggested the anti-cop protests spurred those murders....

Now compare and contrast the Times hateful anti-cop op-ed to their loving tribute to the not-silent, and wholly disruptive protests the tangled the streets of New York by those who protested the fact that two men--who were clearly breaking the law and resisting arrest—died because of their own actions, aggression in one case, resistance in the other:

To that the Times says:
Those protesters “showed a vivid grasp of symbolism.” And despite the fact of oft occurring chants of wanting to see dead cops, the CRAZY NYTimes called those protests a form of “peaceable dissent that lent credibility and potency to their demands.”