The 2nd District Court of Appeal in Los Angeles on Tuesday denied, without comment, an appeal of a lower court decision rejecting a challenge to the measure from Charles Young, the former chancellor of the UCLA campus.
Although Proposition 13 was upheld by the state Supreme Court shortly after its passage, Young contended that by requiring a two-thirds legislative vote for imposing new taxes, the measure constituited a "revision" of the state constitution that could not be enacted by voters.
While voter-approved initiatives can amend the constitution, revisions -- a more fundamental form of change -- must go through a constitutional convention or a constitutional revision commission.
◼ Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association: We just won a major legal battle against a UCLA professor who was suing to have Prop. 13 abolished by the courts. Yesterday, a California appellate court sided in our favor, dismissing his ridiculous arguments!
