Showing posts with label Greta Van Susteren. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Greta Van Susteren. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 2, 2016

Melania Trump talks to Greta







Sunday, May 17, 2015

"I have seen the media report that a few years back I contributed $20,000 to the Clinton Global Initiative and became a member. This is false. I am neither a member nor have I contributed $20,000."

Let’s get something straight…. - Greta Van Susteren

...Although I could, I don’t give to political candidates’ campaigns because I talk about political matters and my personal judgment is that this would not be a good idea. As an aside, even if I were not in the media, I don’t know if I would contribute to a political campaign except for a close friend or family member....

I have been invited to attend the CGI event (like others in the media.) I paid nothing. I was invited. Just as other events where I might meet people who are good sources or guests for ON THE RECORD, I took full advantage of going. I was hoping I could get interviews for OTR and, in fact, I did....

My recollection of attending the CGI events is not perfect since these events are work for me, but I think I went 2 years and I think I interviewed President Clinton each time. I don’t know who else I interviewed but I oddly do remember it was also one of the two times in the 13 years at Fox News Channel that I have ever met Rupert Murdoch. I shook his hand and gave him my name – that was it. (The second time was years later when I saw Rupert Murdoch at a lupus charity event and we talked for the first time. We discussed North Korea as I had just returned from a trip there.)

The idea or suggestion that I am or was a member of Clinton Global Initiative is just silly – I think it is just a word the Clinton Global Inititive used in their event program to describe those who were invited and attended. It is never a word I would have used. This was work for me....

Monday, September 8, 2014

Greta Reveals Shocking Story Of White House Trying To Silence Her For Reporting On Benghazi

Speaking on her On the Record program on Friday, September 5, Van Susteren claimed that “the Obama administration’s behavior post-Benghazi has been weird, like they are hiding something.” - Jeffrey Meyer/Newsbusters



The Fox News host continued by insisting that the White House was deliberately targeting her network for daring to ask questions about Benghazi:
Since day one of Benghazi, Fox News has aggressively investigated. It hasn’t been easy. It's more like pulling teeth trying to get answers from the Obama administration...Remember the days right after the attack, the State Department had a conference call to brief all in the media and excluded Fox News? When confronted, State Department apologized and said it was oversight. Really? An oversight? Well, it happened again a short time later. This time the CIA giving a media briefing and guess who was specifically excluded? You got it. Fox News.
Van Susteren went one step further and maintained that “Fox News is being punished for aggressively asking questions, doing our jobs” and argued that the Obama administration pressured Fox to back down from its Benghazi coverage:
When reporter Jennifer Griffin said she was told that there was a stand down order at Benghazi, I got a weird call from the Obama administration trying to pressure me to get Jennifer to back down on her report. I thought the call from the Obama administration was dirty.
The Fox host concluded her “Off the Record” commentary by hitting the White House one final time for its repeated refusal to turn over all pertinent information on Benghazi:
As recently as April after the administration said it turned over all the information an email surfaces that had been withheld in the face of repeated requests. Are you suspicious? I don’t know about you, but I wasn’t born yesterday.

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Greta Van Susteren recounts administration’s shocking attempt to persuade her to kill Benghazi coverage

Fox News’ Greta Van Susteren shared a very personal and very disturbing story about the extent to which the Obama administration attempted to shut down Fox News Channel from reporting on the terror attack in Benghazi. - Janeen Capizola/Right Wing News

...She took readers for a “little walk in history” to remind of how Fox News Channel was the only network “shut out” of a State Department conference call specifically set up to answer “questions about Benghazi for the media” in the days after the attack in September 2012 and she reminded of “the CIA briefing about Benghazi at the CIA for all the networks – except one: Fox News Channel. The CIA would not let Fox News Channel attend.”

But, as she wrote next, it was the phone call she received from a “good friend in the Obama administration,” that was most shocking and the most “low.”

This “friend” attempted to have Van Susteren stop Fox News’ national security correspondent Jennifer Griffin from reporting on Benghazi.

Van Susteren held nothing back but the “friend’s” name, as she wrote, in part:
And then as I was sitting at my desk thinking about the reporting since September 2012, I thought about the weirdest of all and the worst of all for me personally! I remembered a disturbing phone call from a good friend in the Obama Administration. I have known this friend for years. The call was a short time after 9/11 (maybe Oct. 2012?) In the call, my friend told me that my colleague Jennifer Griffin, who was aggressively reporting on Benghazi, was wrong and that, as a favor to me, my friend in the Administration was telling me so that I could tell Jennifer so that she did not ruin her career. My friend was telling me to tell Jennifer to stop her reporting. Ruin her career?

In 20 plus years, I have never received a call to try and shut down a colleague – not that I even could – this was a first....


VAN SUSTEREN: WH SOURCE TOLD HER TO WARN FOX REPORTER TO BACK OFF BENGHAZI - Kerry Picket/Breitbart

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Media should not be meeting behind closed doors with DOJ/Eric Holder



Brad Woodhouse: Journalists forfeit ‘right to gripe’ if they refuse off-the-record meeting with Holder - Twitchy

The most transparent administration ever didn’t do itself any favors at the peak of the Benghazi scandal by hand-selecting a number of journalists for a “deep background” meeting with Press Secretary Jay Carney. Now, with Attorney General Eric Holder allegedly investigating himself for seizing the phone records of AP reporters and the private emails of Fox News’ James Rosen, some Washington, D.C., news bureau chiefs are being summoned to an off-the-record briefing.

The New York Times has reportedly sent its regrets, not wishing to further encourage the administration’s behind-closed-doors brand of transparency.

Why would any news organizations meet with Attorney General Eric Holder? that is a photo op at a time when the media should keep a comfortable distance and just report the facts! the media and the DOJ should not have closed door meetings! - Greta Van Susteren/Gretawire





Who will hold Eric Holder accountable? - Erik Wemple/Washington Post



HOLDER TO MEET WITH PRESS ON DOJ JOURNALISM GUIDELINES...OFF THE RECORD - Ben Shapiro/Breitbart