In dissent, Scalia accuses 6-judge majority of "interpretive jiggery-pokery" and "defense of the indefensible." "Words no longer have meaning"

Obamacare wins second big Supreme Court victory http://t.co/eErCZbFO4D pic.twitter.com/C93U5qWPZ1

— TheBlaze (@theblaze) June 25, 2015

Scalia dissent "...it rewrites the law to make tax credits available everywhere. We should start calling this law SCOTUScare" #KingvBurwell

— Major Garrett (@MajorCBS) June 25, 2015

In dissent, Scalia accuses 6-judge majority of "interpretive jiggery-pokery" and "defense of the indefensible." http://t.co/SJC7DWjmHu

— Major Garrett (@MajorCBS) June 25, 2015

Scalia dissent "Equating establishment 'by the State' with establishment by the Federal Government makes nonsense of other parts of the Act"

— Major Garrett (@MajorCBS) June 25, 2015

The government won the decision, but Scalia won King v. Burwell. This dissent is unstoppably entertaining. pic.twitter.com/SG0Exq908e

— Derek Thompson (@DKThomp) June 25, 2015

And it doesn't matter, now, that the lie has been exposed. The Lie had a specific goal and only needed to last a year.

— TheUltraYachtLife (@AceofSpadesHQ) June 25, 2015

Abuse of executive power weakened the Republic, but it took the abuse of judicial power to end it.

— John Hayward (@Doc_0) June 25, 2015

Curious to see where this new "law means whatever the party in power thinks it means" principle goes.

— John Hayward (@Doc_0) June 25, 2015